RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomical closure rate and visual outcome in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling without dye enhancement and with indocyanine green or triamcinolone acetonide assistance. METHODS: This is a retrospective, comparative interventional case series. The electronic charts of 435 eyes of 415 patients with idiopathic macular holes who underwent macula hole surgery were reviewed from January 2003 to April 2010. The patients were assigned to 3 groups: no dye assistance (Group 1), indocyanine green-assisted (Group 2), and triamcinolone acetonide-assisted internal limiting membrane peel (Group 3). The data were recorded for 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Main outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity and macular hole closure. RESULTS: The overall macular hole closure rate with a single surgery was 94.7% (108 of 114). In Group 1: 91.4% (191 of 209), in Group 2: 94.1% (112 of 119), and in Group 3: 95.9% (93 of 97) achieved closure. Closure rate for holes that were ≤400 µm in diameter was 98.8% compared with >400 µm, which was 90.4% (P = 0.001). There was a statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement from preoperative visual acuity to postoperative visual acuity in all groups across all time points. There was no statistically significant visual acuity difference among three groups. At 12-month follow-up, 77.7% in Group 1, 66.1% in Group 2, and 81.3% in Group 3 achieved 20/50 visual acuity or better. CONCLUSION: The study shows that good anatomical and functional results can be achieved with no dye and with indocyanine green or triamcinolone acetonide dye assistance for internal limiting membrane peeling during macular hole surgery. Overall, visual acuity levels did not differ among groups, although subanalysis of the results suggests subtle indocyanine green toxicity.
Assuntos
Corantes/administração & dosagem , Membrana Epirretiniana/cirurgia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Verde de Indocianina/administração & dosagem , Perfurações Retinianas/terapia , Triancinolona Acetonida/uso terapêutico , Vitrectomia/métodos , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Corantes/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perfurações Retinianas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acuidade VisualAssuntos
Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/complicações , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana/etiologia , Vasculite Retiniana/etiologia , Uveíte Anterior/etiologia , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/tratamento farmacológico , Bevacizumab , Quimioterapia Combinada , Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusão da Artéria Retiniana/tratamento farmacológico , Vasculite Retiniana/diagnóstico , Vasculite Retiniana/tratamento farmacológico , Uveíte Anterior/diagnóstico , Uveíte Anterior/tratamento farmacológico , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Varfarina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: In this retrospective study on vitreoretinal lymphoma, there was significant change in diagnosis and treatment trends over 17 years at a single institution. Fine needle aspiration biopsy had replaced vitrectomy to collect vitreous sample and external beam radiotherapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy was replaced by intravitreal methotrexate and rituximab, which regressed vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) with no relapses or major ocular complications. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to report the changing trends in treatment (external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] and intravitreal chemotherapy) of VRL and treatment outcomes at a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of vitreous biopsy proven patients was performed. The data analysis included demographics, systemic lymphoma status, ocular symptoms, clinical and immunocytological findings, treatment methods, and response (intravitreal methotrexate 300 µg/0.05 mL, 1000 µg/0.1 mL of rituximab and EBRT 36-45 Gy) and ocular and systemic lymphoma outcomes at last follow-up. RESULTS: Twelve eyes of 8 patients had intraocular B-cell lymphoma (median age, 61 years; range, 50-83). Central nervous system non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (CNS-NHL) was present in 7 of 8 patients. Most common ocular symptoms were diminution of vision in 4 and floaters in 3 patients. Iritis and uveitis were found in 6 eyes and vitritis in 11 eyes. Retinal infiltrates were present in 8 eyes. Immunocytology revealed elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-10 (12,783.5 pg/mL), IL-6 (26.7 pg/mL), and IgH gene rearrangement. Three patients were treated with EBRT, 6 eyes with intravitreal methotrexate (median, 9.5; range, 2-15), and 2 eyes with intravitreal rituximab injections (median, 4; range, 2-6). Two patients developed marked keratitis because of methotrexate toxicity. At median follow-up of 33.5 months (range, 4-96), VRL had resolved in 7 eyes and persistent in 5 eyes. One patient died because of advanced CNS-NHL. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal chemotherapy provided good control rates for VRL patients in our limited series. Patients with associated CNS-NHL had poorer outcomes.