Cervix cancer screening among Greek and immigrant women: the experience of a Greek District Hospital.

PURPOSE: To explore whether there are differences in Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening between native and immigrant women that attended our outpatient clinic. METHODS: In this retrospective study, from January 2002 until December 2003 we examined age, nationality, marital status, economic status (self-reported family income per year) and previous Pap test screening frequency; 3,316 women were included in the study. RESULTS: The average age was 41.95 years. The majority of the women who had had a Pap test (58.4%) were Greeks and 41.6% immigrants. Regarding marital status a percentage of 61.2% were married, 13.7% were single and 24.9% were divorced. Regarding economic status 71.0% of the women had a low-income, 25.1% a middle-income and 3.8% a high-income. Of the women 24.99% had never had a Pap test in their lives. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The possibility of having easy access to a clinic and to routine health care has a critical influence on the cancer screening habits of immigrant women. Opportunistic Pap smear screening as part of a pregnancy or family-planning checkup in local clinics is an acceptable strategy for poor immigrant women.

Delivery and immigration: the experience of a Greek Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: In this retrospective study we investigate the differences regarding the mode of delivery between Greek and immigrant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected data from the Birth Registry of the hospital delivery room for the period from March 1, 2000 to February 29, 2004. We assigned the women into two groups according to their nationality: Greeks and immigrants. We studied the following parameters: age, nationality, parity of women, mode of delivery instrumental delivery (ID), vaginal birth (VD), cesarean section (CS), the indications of CS, and gender and weight of the newborn; 3,071 women met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The average immigrant's age was 2.9 years lower than in the Greek group; 35.2% of the women were Greeks and 64.7% were immigrants. A significant difference was found in the percentage of multipara and the indications for CS--especially prolonged labor (significantly higher in the immigrants), and preeclampsia (significantly higher in the Greeks). There were no significant differences between the two groups referring to the rate of CS, ID or VD, the gender of the newborn, and the birth weight. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: We did not find any significant differences between the two groups regarding the rate of caesarean delivery. In exploring health-related differences between population groups, it is important to determine how race/ethnicity contributes to these differences. A statistically significant association between race or ethnicity and an undesirable health outcome does not by itself establish causality. Health outcomes usually have multiple causes that can be either direct or indirect and are often interrelated and interactive. Race/ethnicity and social class influence health through complex pathways.