Reduced Socioeconomic Disparities in Cleft Care After Implementing a Cleft Nurse Navigator Program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a Cleft Nurse Navigator (CNN) program on care for patients with cleft lip and cleft palate and assess the programs efficacy to reduce existing socioeconomic disparities in care. DESIGN: Retrospective review and outcomes analysis (n = 739). SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All patients presenting with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) born between May 2009 and November 2019 with exclusions for atypical clefts, submucous cleft palates, international adoption, and very late presentation (after 250 days of life). INTERVENTIONS: Multidisciplinary care coordination program facilitated by the CNN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient age at first outpatient appointment and age at surgery, reported feeding issues, weight gain, and patient-cleft team communications. RESULTS: After CNN implementation, median age at outpatient appointment decreased from 20 to 16 days (P = .021), volume of patient-cleft team communications increased from 1.5 to 2.8 (P < .001), and frequency of reported feeding concerns decreased (50% to 35%; P < .001). In the pre-CNN cohort, nonwhite and publicly insured patients experienced delays in first outpatient appointment (P < .001), cleft lip repair (P < .011), and cleft palate repair (P < .019) compared to white and privately insured patients, respectively. In the post-CNN cohort, there were no significant differences in first appointment timing by race nor surgical timing on the basis of racial identity nor insurance type. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of factors lead to delays in cleft care for marginalized patient populations. These findings suggest that a CNN can reduce disparities of access and communication and improve early feeding in at-risk cohorts.

Automatic Segmentation of Bone Selective MR Images for Visualization and Craniometry of the Cranial Vault.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Solid-state MRI has been shown to provide a radiation-free alternative imaging strategy to CT. However, manual image segmentation to produce bone-selective MR-based 3D renderings is time and labor intensive, thereby acting as a bottleneck in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate an automatic multi-atlas segmentation pipeline for use on cranial vault images entirely circumventing prior manual intervention, and to assess concordance of craniometric measurements between pipeline produced MRI and CT-based 3D skull renderings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dual-RF, dual-echo, 3D UTE pulse sequence MR data were obtained at 3T on 30 healthy subjects along with low-dose CT images between December 2018 to January 2020 for this prospective study. The four-point MRI datasets (two RF pulse widths and two echo times) were combined to produce bone-specific images. CT images were thresholded and manually corrected to segment the cranial vault. CT images were then rigidly registered to MRI using mutual information. The corresponding cranial vault segmentations were then transformed to MRI. The "ground truth" segmentations served as reference for the MR images. Subsequently, an automated multi-atlas pipeline was used to segment the bone-selective images. To compare manually and automatically segmented MR images, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were computed, and craniometric measurements between CT and automated-pipeline MRI-based segmentations were examined via Lin's concordance coefficient (LCC). RESULTS: Automated segmentation reduced the need for an expert to obtain segmentation. Average DSC was 90.86 ± 1.94%, and average 95th percentile HD was 1.65 ± 0.44 mm between ground truth and automated segmentations. MR-based measurements differed from CT-based measurements by 0.73-1.2 mm on key craniometric measurements. LCC for distances between CT and MR-based landmarks were vertex-basion: 0.906, left-right frontozygomatic suture: 0.780, and glabella-opisthocranium: 0.956 for the three measurements. CONCLUSION: Good agreement between CT and automated MR-based 3D cranial vault renderings has been achieved, thereby eliminating the laborious manual segmentation process. Target applications comprise craniofacial surgery as well as imaging of traumatic injuries and masses involving both bone and soft tissue.

Poverty and Risk of Cleft Lip and Palate: An Analysis of United States Birth Data.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between poverty and incidence of cleft lip and cleft palate remains unclear. The authors investigated the association between socioeconomic status and cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate only in the United States after controlling for demographic and environmental risk factors. METHODS: The U.S. 2016 and 2017 natality data were utilized. Proxies for socioeconomic status included maternal education, use of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, and payment source for delivery. Multiple logistic regression controlled for household demographics, prenatal care, maternal health, and infant characteristics. RESULTS: Of 6,251,308 live births included, 2984 (0.05 percent) had cleft lip with or without cleft palate and 1180 (0.02 percent) had cleft palate only. Maternal education of bachelor's degree or higher was protective against, and delayed prenatal care associated with, cleft lip with or without cleft palate (adjusted ORs = 0.73 and 1.14 to 1.23, respectively; p < 0.02). Receiving assistance under the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children was associated with cleft palate only (adjusted OR = 1.25; p = 0.003). Male sex, first-trimester tobacco smoking, and maternal gestational diabetes were also associated with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (adjusted ORs = 1.60, 1.01, and 1.19, respectively; p < 0.05). Female sex, prepregnancy tobacco smoking, and maternal infections during pregnancy were associated with cleft palate only (adjusted ORs = 0.74, 1.02, and 1.60, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Increased incidence of orofacial clefts was associated with indicators of lower socioeconomic status, with different indicators associated with different cleft phenotypes. Notably, early prenatal care was protective against the development of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. CLIINCAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Single Segment Neo-Bandeau Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Children With Craniosynostosis: Technique Adaptation and Craniometric Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) of the anterior skull and orbital bandeau is standard of care for craniosynostosis with anterior morphology. Fronto-orbital retrusion, temporal hollowing, and bony contour irregularities are commonly seen in long-term follow-up. In this study, we report several technical adaptations of a new FOA technique described in Fearon et al that help facilitate adaptation of the single-segment neo-bandeau FOA technique in preparation of use in younger patients, and perform a craniometric analysis of the technique. Five consecutive patients who underwent the single-segment neo-bandeau FOA in 2020 with available pre- and post-operative three-dimensional head computed tomography scans were studied. Using Materialise Mimics (Materialise, Ghent, Belgium), cranial length, cranial height, cranial widths, and intracranial volume were measured. Two (40%) patients were male and all were non-Hispanic White with a median age at surgery of 18.6 months (interquartile range 10.4-45.7). Three patients (60%) had bicoronal or other multi-suture craniosynostosis, and 1 each had metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis. Intraoperatively measured intracranial pressure decreased from 17.8 mmHg (R 13.0-20.0) before craniectomy to 4.8 mmHg (R 2.0-11.0; P = 0.038) after craniectomy. Anterior cranial width increased postoperatively (mean 92.6 mm; R 74.9-111.5 versus 117.6 mm; R 109.8-135.2, P = 0.005). Intracranial volume increased from preoperative (mean 1211 cm3; R 782-1949 cm3) to postoperative (1387 cm3; R 1022-2108 cm3; P = 0.009). The authors find in this small sample that a single-segment neo-bandeau FOA demonstrates volumetric expansion similar to conventional FOA techniques and is feasible in infants under 1 year of age.

A Nationwide Analysis of Cleft Palate Repair: Impact of Local Anesthesia on Operative Outcomes and Hospital Cost.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the associations between local anesthesia practice and perioperative complication, length of stay, and hospital cost for palatoplasty in the United States. METHODS: Patients undergoing cleft palate repair between 2004 and 2015 were abstracted from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Perioperative complication, length of stay, and hospital cost were compared by local anesthesia status. Multiple logistic regressions controlled for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Of 17,888 patients from 49 institutions who met selection criteria, 8631 (48 percent), 4447 (25 percent), and 2149 (12 percent) received epinephrine-containing lidocaine, epinephrine-containing bupivacaine, and bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone, respectively. The use of epinephrine-containing bupivacaine or bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone was associated with decreased perioperative complication [adjusted OR, 0.75 (95 percent CI, 0.61 to 0.91) and 0.63 (95 percent CI, 0.47 to 0.83); p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively]. Only bupivacaine- or ropivacaine-alone recipients experienced a significantly reduced risk of prolonged length of stay on adjusted analysis [adjusted OR, 0.71 (95 percent CI, 0.55 to 0.90); p = 0.005]. Risk of increased cost was reduced in users of any local anesthetic (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine-containing bupivacaine or bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone was associated with reduced perioperative complication following palatoplasty, while only the latter predicted a decreased postoperative length of stay. Uses of epinephrine-containing lidocaine, epinephrine-containing bupivacaine, and bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone were all associated with decreased hospital costs. Future prospective studies are warranted to further delineate the role of local anesthesia in palatal surgery. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Is Risk of Secondary Surgery for Oronasal Fistula Following Primary Cleft Palate Repair Associated With Hospital Case Volume and Cost-to-Charge Ratio?

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the association between risk of secondary surgery for oronasal fistula following primary cleft palate repair and 2 hospital characteristics-cost-to-charge ratio (RCC) and case volume of cleft palate repair. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database, which consists of clinical and resource-utilization data from >49 hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair from 2004 to 2009 were abstracted from the PHIS database and followed up for oronasal fistula repair between 2004 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measure was whether patients underwent oronasal fistula repair after primary cleft palate repair. RESULTS: Among 5745 patients from 45 institutions whom met inclusion criteria, 166 (3%) underwent oronasal fistula repair within 6 to 11 years of primary cleft palate repair. Primary palatoplasty at high-RCC facilities was associated with a higher rate of subsequent oronasal fistula repair (odds ratio [OR] = 1.84 [1.32-2.56], adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.81 [1.28-2.59]; P ≤ .001). Likelihood of surgery for oronasal fistula was independent of hospital case volume (OR = 0.83 [0.61-1.13], P = .233; AOR = 0.86 [0.62-1.20], P = .386). Patients with complete unilateral or bilateral cleft palate were more likely to receive oronasal fistula closure compared to those with unilateral-incomplete cleft palate (AOR = 2.09 [1.27-3.56], P = .005; AOR = 3.14 [1.80-5.58], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Subsequent need for oronasal fistula repair, while independent of hospital case volume for cleft palate repair, increased with increasing hospital RCC. Our study also corroborates complete cleft palate and cleft lip as risk factors for oronasal fistula.

What is the Impact of Prenatal Counseling on Postnatal Cleft Treatment? Multidisciplinary Pathway for Prenatal Orofacial Cleft Care.

ABSTRACT: In the pediatric general surgery literature, it has been shown that prenatal diagnosis of a congenital anomaly is an independent predictor of parental psychological distress. Surgical prenatal counseling can decrease parental anxiety by helping families understand the surgical needs and potential outcomes of their infant. In this retrospective analysis (n = 440), the authors sought to present our care pathway for prenatally diagnosed cleft lip and palate (CL/P) and explore the impact of cleft lip and palate-specific prenatal counseling on patient care by comparing the timing of clinical and surgical care between a cohort of patients who received prenatal CL/P consultation and a cohort of patients only seen postnatally. The authors hypothesize that our multidisciplinary prenatal care intervention is associated with earlier postnatal clinic visits and surgical repair. The care of all patients whose mother's presented for prenatal CL/P consultation (prenatal cohort, n = 118) was compared to all new CL/P patients without prenatal consultation at our institution (postnatal cohort, n = 322) from January 2015 through August 2019. 81.4% (n = 96) of the prenatal cohort returned for care postnatally while 2 pregnancies were interrupted, four neonates died, and 15 patients did not return for care. Prenatal consultation was associated with earlier postnatal clinic appointments (P < 0.001) as well as a shorter time to CL repair in patients with CL only (P = 0.002) and CLP (P = 0.047). Our described pre- and postnatal CL/P pathway is a multidisciplinary model associated with high retention rates from the prenatal period through complete surgical repair.

The Linton A. Whitaker Legacy: Cultivating Craniofacial Surgeon Leaders.

BACKGROUND: Linton A. Whitaker is a pioneer of craniofacial surgery. He served as chief of plastic surgery at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania and director of the craniofacial training program. Herein, the authors reflect on his legacy by studying the accomplishments of his trainees. METHODS: Dr Whitaker's trainees who completed (a) craniofacial fellowship training while he was director of the program or (b) residency training while he was chief were identified. Curricula vitae were reviewed. Variables analyzed included geographic locations, practice types, academic leadership positions, scholarly work, and bibliometric data. RESULTS: Between 1980 and 2011, 34 surgeons completed craniofacial fellowship training under Dr Whitaker, and 11 completed plastic surgery training under his chairmanship and subsequent craniofacial fellowship. The majority had active craniofacial practices after training (83.3%) and practice in an academic setting (78.0%). Most settled in the northeast (31.1%) and south (31.1%) but across 24 states nationally. Overall, the mean ± SD number of publications was 76 ± 81 (range, 2-339); book chapters, 23 ± 29 (0-135); H-index, 18 ± 12 (1-45); and grants, 13 ± 16 (0-66). Of those who pursued academia, 53.1% were promoted to full professor, 46.9% had a program director role, 75.0% directed a craniofacial program, and 53.1% achieved the rank of chief/chair. CONCLUSIONS: Equally important to Dr Whitaker's clinical contributions in plastic and craniofacial surgery is the development and success of his trainees who will undoubtedly continue the legacy of training the next generation of craniofacial surgeon leaders.

Thresholds for Safety of Cleft Lip Surgery in Premature Infants.

The purpose of this study was to delineate optimal age to perform unilateral or bilateral cleft lip repair in premature patients. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric data set was queried for unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repairs performed between 2012 and 2017. Complications, readmissions, and reoperations were analyzed in the context of prematurity with appropriate statistics. Degree of prematurity was significantly associated with adverse events (p = 0.001, rs = 0.44). Premature patients with unilateral cleft lip had a significantly decreased risk of adverse events when performing cleft lip repair after 150 days of age [OR, 18.1; p = 0.004; before cutoff, n = 10 of 140 (7.1 percent); after cutoff, n = 0 of 112 (0.0 percent)] in the absence of other risk factors. Premature patients with bilateral cleft lip had a significantly decreased risk of adverse events when performing cleft lip repair after 175 days of age (OR, 16.1; p = 0.010; before cutoff, n = 7 of 33 (21.2 percent); after cutoff, n = 0 of 28 (0.0 percent)] in the absence of other risk factors. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Risk, II.

Ear Molding Therapy: Laypersons' Perceptions, Preferences, and Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome.

This study investigates laypersons' perceptions of congenital ear deformities and preferences for treatment, particularly with ear molding therapy-an effective, noninvasive, yet time-sensitive treatment. METHODS: Laypersons were recruited via crowdsourcing to view photographs of normal ears or one of the following ear deformities, pre- and post-molding: constricted, cryptotia, cupped/lopped, helical rim deformity, prominent, and Stahl. Participants answered questions regarding perceptions and treatment preferences for the ear. Statistical analyses included multiple linear and logistic regressions and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 983 individuals participated in the study. All deformities were perceived as significantly abnormal, likely to impair hearing, and associated with lower psychosocial quality of life (all P < 0.001). For all deformities, participants were likely to choose ear molding over surgery despite the logistical and financial implications of ear molding (all P < 0.02). Participants were significantly more satisfied with the outcome of ear molding in all deformities compared with control, except constricted ears (all P < 0.002, except Pconstricted = 0.073). Concern for hearing impairment due to ear deformity was associated with increased likelihoods of seeing a physician (P < 0.001) and choosing ear molding despite treatment logistics and costs (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laypersons perceived all ear deformities as abnormal and associated with low psychosocial quality of life. Despite logistical and financial implications, laypersons generally desired molding therapy for ear deformities; treatment outcomes were satisfactory for all deformities except constricted ears. Timely diagnosis of this condition is crucial to reaping the benefits of ear molding therapy.

Orthognathic Hardware Complications in the Era of Patient-Specific Implants.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing orthognathic skeletal correction present with a variety of comorbidities that may affect surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine how patient risk factors and operative technique contribute to complication rates after orthognathic surgery in the era of patient-specific implants. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of pediatric patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and/or genioplasty from 2014 to 2018. Patient risk factors, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were gathered and compared with appropriate statistics. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria, with an overall 1-year complication rate of 11.7 percent (11 of 94). Patient-specific mandibular plates are significantly associated with infection (p = 0.009; OR, 8.8), occurrence of any complication (p = 0.003; OR, 8.3), readmission (p < 0.001; OR, 11.1), and reoperation (p < 0.001; OR, 11.4). In patients with syndromes or history of cleft lip/palate, patient-specific mandibular plates are associated with infection (p = 0.006; OR, 10.3), readmission (p < 0.001; OR, 21.6), and reoperation (p < 0.001; OR, 22.9). In multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, syndrome status, and orofacial cleft history, use of patient-specific mandibular plates was associated with infection (p = 0.017; adjusted OR, 12.5), any complication (p = 0.007; adjusted OR, 11.8), readmission (p = 0.001; adjusted OR, 17.9), and reoperation (p = 0.001; adjusted OR, 18.9). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of patient-specific orthognathic surgery, syndromic status and use of patient-specific mandibular plates are associated with increased infection, readmission, and reoperation because of hardware-related complications. The authors' data support increased caution and counseling with use of patient-specific mandibular implants in patients with syndromic status, history of orofacial cleft, and history of previous maxillomandibular surgery given increased risk of hardware-related complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Trends in Utilization of Virtual Surgical Planning in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: While the use of virtual surgical planning (VSP) has been well described in the adult craniofacial literature, there has been little written about pediatric uses or trends. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evolving utilization of VSP for pediatric craniofacial procedures. METHODS: The authors' prospective institutional review board-approved craniofacial registry was queried for index craniofacial procedures from January 2011 through December 2018. Data was collected regarding utilization of traditional surgical planning versus VSP, as well as the extent of VSP's influence on the operative procedure. These data were analyzed for trends over time and compared using appropriate statistics. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 1131 index craniofacial cases were performed, of which 160 cases (14.1%) utilized VSP. Utilization of VSP collectively increased over time, from 2.0% in 2011 to 18.6% in 2018 (P < 0.001). Utilization rates of VSP varied across procedures from 0% of craniosynostosis cases and fronto-orbital advancement cases to 67% of osteocutaneous free tissue transfers (P < 0.001). The most profound contributor to increase in VSP utilization was orthognathic surgery, utilized in 0% of orthognathic procedures in 2011 to 68.3% of orthognathic procedures in 2018 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of virtual surgical planning for pediatric craniofacial procedures is increasing, especially for complex orthognathic procedures and osteocutaneous free tissue transfers. Utilization patterns of individual components of the VSP system demonstrate unique footprints across the spectrum of craniofacial procedures, which reinforces the specific and variable benefits of this workflow for treating pediatric craniofacial disorders.

Long Term Speech Outcomes Following Midface Advancement in Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

Midface advancement by distraction osteogenesis (DO) is commonly performed in patients with craniosynostosis for indications including midface hypoplasia, exorbitism, obstructive sleep apnea, class III malocclusion, and overall aesthetic facial deficiency. There is evidence to suggest that maxillary LeFort I advancement increases the risk of velopharyngeal dysfunction in the cleft palate population, yet few studies have investigated changes in speech following LeFort III or monobloc midface advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of midface DO on speech as indicated by the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score in patients with Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer Syndrome. Among 73 midface advancement cases performed during the study period, 19 cases met inclusion criteria. Overall, the highest post-advancement Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score (PWSS) was significantly higher than the pre-advancement PWSS (0.52 versus 2.42, P = 0.01), indicating an acute worsening of VPI post-advancement. Specifically, the PWSS components nasal emission and nasality were significantly higher post-advancement than pre-advancement (nasal emission: 1.16 versus 0.21, P = 0.02) (nasality: 0.68 versus 0.05, P = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference between pre-advancement PWSS and the latest post-advancement PWSS (P = 0.31). Midface distraction is associated with an acute worsening of VPI post-operatively that is followed by improvement, and often resolution over time. Future work with additional patient accrual is needed to determine the effect of different advancement procedures and syndromes on VPI rates and profundity.

Craniometric and Volumetric Analyses of Cranial Base and Cranial Vault Differences in Patients With Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

PURPOSE: How different from "normal" are the cranial base and vault of infants with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal synostosis (NSSS)? This study quantitatively addresses this question utilizing computed tomography (CT) analytic technology. METHOD: Head CT scans of infants with NSSS and normocephalic controls were analyzed using Mimics to calculate craniometric angles, distances, and segmented volumes. Craniometric measurements and asymmetry indices were compared between NSSS and control groups using linear regressions controlling for age. Ratios of anterior-, middle-, and posterior-to-total cranial vault volume were compared between groups using beta regressions controlling for age. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with NSSS and 19 controls were identified. Cranial index and interoccipital angle were significantly smaller in NSSS compared with controls (P = 0.003 and <0.001, respectively). Right-but not left-external acoustic meatus angle and internal acoustic meatus-to-midline distance were significantly greater in NSSS than in controls (P = 0.021 and 0.016, respectively). NSSS patients and controls did not significantly differ in any asymmetry indices, except for the articular fossa angle asymmetry index (P = 0.016). Anterior vault volume proportion was greater in NSSS relative to controls (proportion ratio = 1.63, P < 0.001). NSSS trended toward a smaller posterior vault volume proportion (P = 0.068) yet did not differ in middle vault volume proportion compared with controls. CONCLUSION: In this small study, patients with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis had relatively similar cranial base measurements, and larger anterior vault volumes, when compared with controls. Further work is needed to confirm the possibility of rightward asymmetry of the anterior cranial base.

Perceptions and Preferences of Laypersons in the Management of Positional Plagiocephaly.

BACKGROUND: Uncertain clinical evidence for treating positional plagiocephaly, especially with helmet therapy, creates difficulties in counseling parents of patients. This study investigates layperson perceptions and treatment preferences for positional plagiocephaly to provide patient-oriented evidence for management. METHODS: Adult laypersons were recruited through crowdsourcing to view digitally-modified images of normal, mildly, moderately, or severely plagiocephalic infant heads. Participants provided demographic information and rated the infant's head shape and potential related social difficulties, likelihood of consulting a physician for treatment options, and likelihood of seeking helmeting treatment for the infant. RESULTS: Nine hundred forty-five individuals participated in the study. Perception of head shape, prediction of future embarrassment and social difficulties, likelihood of seeking physician evaluation, likelihood of choosing helmet therapy, and willingness-to-pay for helmet therapy were pairwise-different between 4 plagiocephaly severities (corrected-P < 0.001 for all), except between normocephaly (n = 194) and mild (n = 334) plagiocephaly or between moderate (n = 203) and severe (n = 214) plagiocephaly. Younger respondents were more likely to consult a physician (uncorrected-P = 0.016) and choose helmet therapy (uncorrected-P = 0.004) for infants with normocephaly or mild plagiocephaly. Parents of children with physical disabilities were 6 times as likely as other participants to choose helmet therapy for mild plagiocephaly (corrected-P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Laypersons perceived moderate and severe plagiocephaly as equally abnormal and mild plagiocephaly as normal, consistent with their treatment preferences. Parents of physically disabled children were significantly more likely than other participants to choose helmet therapy. Our findings provide medical professionals with lay perspectives on positional plagiocephaly that may facilitate effective counseling of parents.

Pediatric Otoplasty: Does Surgical Specialty Training Affect Safety and Rates of Adverse Perioperative Events?

BACKGROUND: Otoplasty remains an overlapping clinical domain of plastic surgery and otolaryngology. The purpose of this study is to objectively analyze the safety of otoplasty and determine if there are any risk factors, such as surgical training, associated with increased patient morbidity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted of otoplasty procedures performed in North America by plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists between 2012 and 2017 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric dataset. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze the relationships between comorbidities, congenital malformations, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were 777 otoplasty procedures performed during the study period. Median age at time of surgery was 8.3 years (95% CI 7.9-8.7 years). Plastic surgeons performed 75.8% (n = 589) procedures and otolaryngologists performed 23.4% (n = 182). No significant (P = 0.952) difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between surgical specialties was appreciated despite the fact that operative time was significantly longer in procedures performed by otolaryngologists (121 minutes versus 94 minutes, P < 0.001). Overall, 1.3% (n = 10 of 777) children experienced a complication, with the most common complication being superficial surgical site infection, occurring in 0.9% (n = 7 of 777) patients. There was no association of comorbidities (P all > 0.324) or congenital malformations (P all > 0.382) contributing to postoperative complications. Reoperation (0.8%, n = 6 of 777) and readmission (0.4%, n = 3 of 777) were uncommon; nevertheless, these adverse events were significantly associated with multiple inherent patient risk factors on multivariate regression. CONCLUSIONS: Otoplasty is a relatively safe surgical procedure with similarly low complication and readmission rates when performed by plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists. Surgical site infection remains the most prevalent complication after otoplasty. Readmission and reoperation after otoplasty were significantly correlated to prematurity, structural pulmonary abnormality, alimentary tract disease, and seizure disorder.

Value-Based Analysis of Virtual Versus Traditional Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In orthognathic surgery, virtual surgical planning (VSP) is gaining popularity over traditional surgical planning (TSP); however, concerns about cost of VSP have slowed adoption of this technology. This study investigates the clinical value of VSP versus TSP over the entire clinical care continuum. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted for patients undergoing maxillomandibular surgery between 2005 and 2016 at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Clinical value, defined as patient outcomes per unit cost, was analyzed between the 2 groups with appropriate statistics. RESULTS: The VSP (n = 19) and TSP (n = 10) cohorts had statistically similar hospital lengths of stay, rates of complications, readmissions, and duration of postoperative orthodontic treatment (P = 0.518, P > 0.999, P > 0.999, P = 0.812, respectively). VSP maxillomandibular procedures trended towards shorter operative times (P = 0.052). Total hospital charges were statistically similar between the TSP and VSP cohorts (P = 0.160). Medication, laboratory and testing, and room charges were also statistically similar between the TSP and VSP cohorts (P = 0.169, P = 0.953, and P = 0.196 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Indexed patient outcomes and costs incurred for maxillomandibular procedures were statistically similar between those utilizing TSP or VSP leading us to conclude that these 2 methods are associated with similar clinical value. This retrospective analysis should be followed with prospective data to give patients and insurers the best estimate of clinical value utilizing TSP and VSP.