RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a national level. METHODS: The working group reconvened in 2017 to review the relevance of previously proposed QIs, identify opportunities to develop new QIs, and propose an initial strategy for measuring and reporting. RESULTS: Two additional priority QIs were added to the previous 3: proportion of patients with nonvalvular (NV) AF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and annual rate of hospitalization for a new heart failure diagnosis. An environmental scan was undertaken to determine the potential of existing databases to provide national and provincial estimates. On the basis of validated administrative codes, the Canadian Institute for Health Information discharge abstract database can be used for inpatients. In collaboration with the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, 2 of the 5 QIs can be assessed in outpatients (patients with NVAF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and high risk for stroke NVAF/AFL receiving oral anticoagulation). Stroke prevention therapy can be further measured in selected provinces with linked databases including prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This first step could provide a better initial understanding of the quality of AF/AFL care in Canada, but important gaps in the meaningful measurement of QIs remain. The AF/AFL QI working group has limited capacity to make progress without national level leadership and the resources to support data aggregation, data analysis, and pan-Canadian reporting.
CONTEXTE: En 2010, le groupe de travail des indicateurs de qualité (IQ) de la Société canadienne de cardiologie sur la fibrillation auriculaire (FA) et le flutter auriculaire (FLA) a été mis sur pied pour élaborer des IQ et évaluer la faisabilité d'utiliser ces IQ comme outils de mesure. Après un examen approfondi, trois IQ prioritaires ont été sélectionnés, mais aucun n'a pu être mesuré à l'échelle nationale. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le groupe de travail s'est réuni à nouveau en 2017 afin d'examiner la pertinence des IQ proposés au départ, de recenser des occasions d'élaborer de nouveau IQ et de proposer une stratégie initiale de mesure et de production de rapports à cet égard. RÉSULTATS: Deux IQ prioritaires supplémentaires ont été ajoutés aux trois premiers : la proportion de patients atteints de FA non valvulaire (FANV) ou de FLA ayant fait l'objet d'un tri selon la strate de risque d'AVC et le taux annuel d'hospitalisations attribuables à un nouveau diagnostic d'insuffisance cardiaque. Une analyse de l'environnement a été réalisée afin de déterminer si les bases de données existantes pouvaient fournir des estimations nationales et provinciales. Dans le cas de patients hospitalisés, on peut utiliser la Base de données sur les congés des patients de l'Institut canadien d'information sur la santé en se servant de codes administratifs validés. Dans le cas de patients non hospitalisés (patients atteints de FANV/FLA, triés par strate de risque, exposés à un risque élevé d'AVC en raison d'une FANV ou d'un FLA et recevant une anticoagulation orale), on peut mesurer deux des cinq IQ, en collaboration avec le Réseau canadien de surveillance sentinelle en soins primaires. Le traitement préventif de l'AVC peut continuer à faire l'objet de mesures dans certaines provinces grâce aux bases de données interreliées, comme les bases de données sur les ordonnances. CONCLUSIONS: Cette première étape a permis d'obtenir une meilleure compréhension initiale de la qualité de la prise en charge de la FA et du FLA au Canada, mais d'importantes lacunes restent à combler pour rendre pertinente la mesure des IQ. Le groupe de travail des IQ sur de la FA et le FLA n'a pas toutes les capacités requises pour réaliser des progrès en l'absence de leadership national et de ressources permettant de soutenir le regroupement et l'analyse des données, ainsi que la production de rapports à l'échelle pancanadienne.
RESUMO
Cerebrovascular (CVD) disease is commonly associated with coronary artery disease and adversely affects outcome. The goal of the present study was to examine the temporal management patterns and outcomes in relation to previous CVD in a contemporary "real-world" spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). From 1999 to 2008, 14,070 patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS were recruited into the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome I (ACS I), ACS II, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)), and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) prospective multicenter registries. We stratified the study patients according to a history of CVD and compared their treatment and outcomes. Patients with a history of CVD were older, more likely to have pre-existing coronary artery disease, elevated creatinine, higher Killip class, and ST-segment deviation on admission. Despite presenting with greater GRACE risk scores (137 vs 117, p <0.001), patients with previous CVD were less likely to receive evidence-based antiplatelet and antithrombin therapies during the initial 24 hours of hospital admission. They were also less likely to undergo in-hospital coronary angiography and revascularization. These disparities in medical and invasive management were preserved temporally across all 4 registries. Patients with concomitant CVD had worse in-hospital outcomes. Previous CVD remained an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.92, p = 0.019) after adjusting for other powerful prognosticators in the GRACE risk score. However, it was independently associated with a lower use of in-hospital coronary angiography (adjusted odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.83, p <0.001). Underestimation of patient risk was the most common reason for not pursuing an invasive strategy. Revascularization was independently associated with lower 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.71, p <0.001), irrespective of a history of CVD. In conclusion, for patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation-ACS, a history of CVD was independently associated with worse outcomes, which might have been, in part, because of the underuse of evidence-based medical and invasive therapies.
