Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 46(6): 695-9, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25720805

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate fetal cardiac angle as a screening tool for 22q11.2 deletion among cases with cardiac anomalies known to be associated with this genetic condition, to examine the correlation of fetal cardiac angle with thymic-thoracic (TT)-ratio, and to assess the performance of TT ratio as a covariate in screening for 22q11.2 deletion. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that reviewed the records of 74 cases with cardiac anomalies known to be associated with 22q11.2 deletion (tetralogy of Fallot, common arterial trunk, interrupted aortic arch and right aortic arch) that were diagnosed between 2007 and 2013. The karyotype was known in all cases. The fetal cardiac angle and TT-ratio were measured using stored three-dimensional spatiotemporal image correlation volume datasets and compared in those with del.22q11.2 and those without. RESULTS: Of the 74 cases reviewed, 16 had 22q11.2 deletion. The mean cardiac angle was larger in the cases with 22q11.2 deletion than in those without (68.6° vs 58.7°, respectively; P = 0.02). Multivariate regression analysis showed an association between cardiac angle and TT-ratio in fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion (r(2) = 0.33; P = 0.02) but not in those with a normal karyotype (P = 0.4). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that fetal cardiac angle, but not TT-ratio, is an independent predictor of 22q11.2 deletion among fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion-associated cardiac anomalies (P = 0.02; area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: An enlarged fetal cardiac angle is an independent predictor of 22q11.2 deletion among fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion-associated cardiac anomalies. However, its performance as a single variable in a screening model is not sufficient to guide management decisions regarding invasive testing.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Deleção 22q11/embriologia , Coração Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiopatias Congênitas/embriologia , Síndrome da Deleção 22q11/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome da Deleção 22q11/genética , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Torácica/embriologia , Feminino , Coração Fetal/anormalidades , Idade Gestacional , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiopatias Congênitas/genética , Humanos , Cariótipo , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 42(6): 634-43, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23630102

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between maternal age and a wide range of adverse pregnancy outcomes after adjustment for confounding factors in obstetric history and maternal characteristics. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in women with singleton pregnancies attending the first routine hospital visit at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation. Data on maternal characteristics, and medical and obstetric history were collected and pregnancy outcomes ascertained. Maternal age was studied, both as a continuous and as a categorical variable. Regression analysis was performed to examine the association between maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome including pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm delivery, small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonate, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonate, miscarriage, stillbirth and elective and emergency Cesarean section. RESULTS: The study population included 76 158 singleton pregnancies with a live fetus at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. After adjusting for potential maternal and pregnancy confounding variables, advanced maternal age (defined as ≥ 40 years) was associated with increased risk of miscarriage (odds ratio (OR), 2.32 (95% CI, 1.83-2.93); P < 0.001), pre-eclampsia (OR, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.22-1.82); P < 0.001), GDM (OR, 1.88 (95% CI, 1.55-2.29); P < 0.001), SGA (OR, 1.46 (95% CI, 1.27-1.69); P < 0.001) and Cesarean section (OR, 1.95 (95% CI, 1.77-2.14); P < 0.001), but not with stillbirth, gestational hypertension, spontaneous preterm delivery or LGA. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal age should be combined with other maternal characteristics and obstetric history when calculating an individualized adjusted risk for adverse pregnancy complications. Advanced maternal age is a risk factor for miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, SGA, GDM and Cesarean section, but not for stillbirth, gestational hypertension, spontaneous preterm delivery or LGA.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Materna , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Macrossomia Fetal/epidemiologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fumar/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...