Rugosity in Grimontia hollisae.

Grimontia hollisae, formerly Vibrio hollisae, produces both smooth and rugose colonial variants. The rugose colony phenotype is characterized by wrinkled colonies producing copious amounts of exopolysaccharide. Cells from a rugose colony grown at 30 degrees C form rugose colonies, while the same cells grown at 37 degrees C form smooth colonies, which are characterized by a nonwrinkled, uncrannied appearance. Stress response studies revealed that after exposure to bleach for 30 min, rugose survivors outnumbered smooth survivors. Light scatter information obtained by flow cytometry indicated that rugose cells clumped into clusters of three or more cells (average, five cells) and formed two major clusters, while smooth cells formed only one cluster of single cells or doublets. Fluorescent lectin-binding flow cytometry studies revealed that the percentages of rugose cells that bound either wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) or Galanthus nivalis lectin (GNL) were greater than the percentages of smooth cells that bound the same lectins (WGA, 35% versus 3.5%; GNL, 67% versus 0.21%). These results indicate that the rugose exopolysaccharide consists partially of N-acetylglucosamine and mannose. Rugose colonies produced significantly more biofilm material than did smooth colonies, and rugose colonies grown at 30 degrees C produced more biofilm material than rugose colonies grown at 37 degrees C. Ultrastructurally, rugose colonies show regional cellular differentiation, with apical and lateral colonial regions containing cells embedded in a matrix stained by Alcian Blue. The cells touching the agar surface are packed tightly together in a palisade-like manner. The central region of the colony contains irregularly arranged, fluid-filled spaces and loosely packed chains or arrays of coccoid and vibrioid cells. Smooth colonies, in contrast, are flattened, composed of vibrioid cells, and lack distinct regional cellular differences. Results from suckling mouse studies showed that both orally fed rugose and smooth variants elicited significant, but similar, amounts of fluid accumulated in the stomach and intestines. These observations comprise the first report of expression and characterization of rugosity by G. hollisae and raise the possibility that expression of rugose exopolysaccharide in this organism is regulated at least in part by growth temperature.

Regulatory action criteria for filth and other extraneous materials v. strategy for evaluating hazardous and nonhazardous filth.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) uses regulatory action criteria for filth and extraneous materials to evaluate adulteration of food products. The criteria are organized into three categories: health hazards, indicators of insanitation, and natural or unavoidable defects. The health hazard category includes criteria for physical, chemical, and microbiological hazards associated with filth and extraneous materials. The health hazard category encompasses criteria for HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) hazards and HACCP contributing factors. The indicators of insanitation category includes criteria for visibly objectionable contaminants, contamination from commensal pests, and other types of contamination that are associated with insanitary conditions in food processing and storage facilities. The natural or unavoidable category includes criteria for harmless, naturally occurring defects and contaminants. A decision tree is presented for the sequential application of regulatory action criteria for filth and extraneous materials associated with each category and with each type of filth or extraneous material in the three categories. This final report of a series in the development of a transparent science base for a revised FDA regulatory policy in the area of filth and extraneous materials in food includes a comprehensive list of the references that form the science base for the FDA regulatory policy.

Regulatory action criteria for filth and other extraneous materials. .IV. Visual detection of hair in food.

Under Section 402(a)(3) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act the distribution of foods which may contain repulsive or offensive matter, considered as filth, is prohibited. Filth includes contaminants such as rat, mouse, and other animal hairs and excreta; whole insects, insect parts, and excreta; and other extraneous materials which, because of their repulsiveness, would not knowingly be eaten or used. The presence of such filth renders food adulterated. Some foods, even when produced under good manufacturing practice, contain low levels of natural or unavoidable defects such as dirt, insect parts, and hair that are not hazardous to health. Although the health hazard is eliminated, most consumers find the presence of "any" visible filth contaminant such as hair in a food product objectionable. The objective of this study was to determine when a defect (hair) in a food (mushrooms) is visible to a consumer by testing the visual acuity of a consumer panel under controlled laboratory conditions. Of the panelists participating in the study, when presented with a single hair on a flat surface with a solid-colored background, 27% were able to detect a 1-mm hair, 58% were able to detect a 3-mm hair, and 75% were able to detect a 10-mm hair. Twenty-five percent of the panelists surveyed were able to detect a 5- or 10-mm hair on sliced, canned mushrooms. The experimental design and results of this study are discussed.

Identification of the source of reagent variability in the xanthydrol/urea method.

Contamination of food and food packaging material by rodent urine is evidence of insanitary conditions. Urea from rodent urine is used as a chemical indicator of contamination. The limit of detection of the xanthydrol/urea AOAC Method 959.14 by formation of dixanthylurea crystals is 4 micrograms urea isolated from urine on packaging material. Six different lots of xanthydrol from 5 different manufacturers were compared. Differences in urea detection sensitivity of the xanthydrol of up to 1000-fold were observed. Melting points showed further evidence of variability and impurities in xanthydrol lots. A liquid chromatographic method was developed to separate and identify the impurities. Confirmation of analytes was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Use of urease-bromothymol blue-agar method for large-scale testing of urine on grain and seeds.

The current AOAC method (963.28) for large-scale (50 g) testing of urine on grain is based on the reaction of sodium in urine with magnesium uranyl acetate. Detection of sodium suggests that urine is present and that a test for urea is appropriate. Urea is detected with urease-bromothymol blue-paper and is confirmed through its reaction with xanthydrol to form dixanthylurea crystals, which are detected microscopically. The initial nonspecific test for sodium can be influenced by the presence of salt or other sodium compounds. Furthermore, the magnesium uranyl acetate spray used in Method 963.28 potentially exposes the analyst to the aerosol of a volatile, toxic uranium compound. Excess reagents and analyzed test portions must be disposed of as radioactive waste. In addition, Method 963.28 requires several steps to determine the presence of urea. The alternative AOAC method (972.41) tests for the presence of urea from urine on individual seeds. Urea is enzymatically decomposed to ammonia and carbon dioxide by urease. Liberated ammonia shifts the pH, changing the color of the indicator in the agar from yellow to blue. This study adapts Method 972.41 to larger test samples. Up to 25 g grains and seeds are sprayed with urease test agar instead of being individually immersed in the urease test agar. The modified method was used to analyze urea on seeds and grains of 24 plants from 4 families. The method has a limit of detection of one seed contaminated with 1 microgram urea.