Reducing Pediatric Unplanned Extubation Across Multiple ICUs Using Quality Improvement.

OBJECTIVES: Unplanned extubation (UE) in pediatric patients can result in significant harm or mortality. In our institution, efforts to reduce UE in the ICU were siloed and learnings were not shared. Our goal was to implement shared initiatives across ICUs in a pediatric institution using quality improvement methodology, with the global aim of reducing serious harm caused by UEs. METHODS: The study was conducted as a single-center prospective quality improvement initiative in the pediatric, neonatal, and cardiac ICUs of a large, freestanding academic pediatric hospital. Using the model for improvement and plan-do-study-act cycles, our multidisciplinary team implemented multiple interventions to reduce UEs. The primary measure monitored was the monthly UE rate, defined as the number of UEs per 100 ventilator days, which was tracked over time using statistical control charts. RESULTS: The overall monthly institutional UE rate was reduced from 1.22 UE per 100 ventilator days to 0.2 UE per 100 ventilator days, representing an 84% improvement in rate and reduction of harm. Sixteen percent to 21% of UEs required additional resources because of a difficult airway, and 10% to 22% of UEs resulted in cardiovascular collapse requiring resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Significant harm is associated with UEs in pediatric patients. We implemented a bundle for UE reduction across all ICU populations in a pediatric hospital and significantly reduced the rate of UE within our institution and within each individual unit. Allowing variation for implementation of interventions by unit, although targeting a common goal, contributed to overall success and sustainability.

Developing and evaluating the success of a family activated medical emergency team: a quality improvement report.

BACKGROUND: Family-activated medical emergency teams (MET) have the potential to improve the timely recognition of clinical deterioration and reduce preventable adverse events. Adoption of family-activated METs is hindered by concerns that the calls may substantially increase MET workload. We aimed to develop a reliable process for family activated METs and to evaluate its effect on MET call rate and subsequent transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: The setting was our free-standing children's hospital. We partnered with families to develop and test an educational intervention for clinicians and families, an informational poster in each patient room and a redesigned process with hospital operators who handle MET calls. We tracked our primary outcome of count of family-activated MET calls on a statistical process control chart. Additionally, we determined the association between family-activated versus clinician-activated MET and transfer to the ICU. Finally, we compared the reason for MET activation between family calls and a 2:1 matched sample of clinician calls. RESULTS: Over our 6-year study period, we had a total of 83 family-activated MET calls. Families made an average of 1.2 calls per month, which represented 2.9% of all MET calls. Children with family-activated METs were transferred to the ICU less commonly than those with clinician MET calls (24% vs 60%, p<0.001). Families, like clinicians, most commonly called MET for concerns of clinical deterioration. Families also identified lack of response from clinicians and a dismissive interaction between team and family as reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Family MET activations were uncommon and not a burden on responders. These calls recognised clinical deterioration and communication failures. Family activated METs should be tested and implemented in hospitals that care for children.