Diffusion MRI fiber diameter for muscle denervation assessment.

BACKGROUND: To develop and evaluate a diffusion MRI-based apparent muscle fiber diameter (AFD) method in patients with muscle denervation. It was hypothesized that AFD differences between denervated, non-denervated and control muscles would be greater than those from standard diffusion metrics. METHODS: A spin-echo diffusion acquisition with multi-b-valued diffusion sampling was used. An orientation-invariant dictionary approach utilized a cylinder-based forward model and multi-compartment model for obtaining restricted and free fractions. Simulations were performed to determine precision, bias, and optimize dictionary parameters. In all, 18 exams of patients with muscle denervation and 8 exams of healthy subjects were performed at 3T. Six regions of interests (ROIs) within separate shoulder muscles were selected, yielding three groups consisting 47 control (healthy), 36 non-denervated (patients), and 68 denervated (patients) muscle ROIs. Two-sample t-tests (α=0.05) between groups were performed with Holm-Bonferroni correction. T2- and fat fraction (FF)-mapping were acquired for comparison. RESULTS: Mean AFD was 89.7±13.6 µm in control, 71.6±15.3 µm in non-denervated, and 60.7±15.9 µm in denervated muscles and were significantly different (P<0.001) in paired comparisons and in 10/12 individual muscle region comparisons. Correlation between AFD and FF (-0.331, P<0.001) was low, but correlation between FA and FF was negligible (0.197, P=0.016). Correlation was low between AFD and T2 (-0.395, P<0.001) and between FA and T2 (0.359, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion MRI-based AFD complements T2- and FF-mapping techniques to non-invasively assess muscle denervation.

Improvement of peripheral nerve visualization using a deep learning-based MR reconstruction algorithm.

OBJECTIVE: To assess a new deep learning-based MR reconstruction method, "DLRecon," for clinical evaluation of peripheral nerves. METHODS: Sixty peripheral nerves were prospectively evaluated in 29 patients (mean age: 49 ± 16 years, 17 female) undergoing standard-of-care (SOC) MR neurography for clinically suspected neuropathy. SOC-MRIs and DLRecon-MRIs were obtained through conventional and DLRecon reconstruction methods, respectively. Two radiologists randomly evaluated blinded images for outer epineurium conspicuity, fascicular architecture visualization, pulsation artifact, ghosting artifact, and bulk motion. RESULTS: DLRecon-MRIs were likely to score better than SOC-MRIs for outer epineurium conspicuity (OR = 1.9, p = 0.007) and visualization of fascicular architecture (OR = 1.8, p < 0.001) and were likely to score worse for ghosting (OR = 2.8, p = 0.004) and pulsation artifacts (OR = 1.6, p = 0.004). There was substantial to almost-perfect inter-reconstruction method agreement (AC = 0.73-1.00) and fair to almost-perfect interrater agreement (AC = 0.34-0.86) for all features evaluated. DLRecon-MRI had improved interrater agreement for outer epineurium conspicuity (AC = 0.71, substantial agreement) compared to SOC-MRIs (AC = 0.34, fair agreement). In >80% of images, the radiologist correctly identified an image as SOC- or DLRecon-MRI. DISCUSSION: Outer epineurium and fascicular architecture conspicuity, two key morphological features critical to evaluating a nerve injury, were improved in DLRecon-MRIs compared to SOC-MRIs. Although pulsation and ghosting artifacts increased in DLRecon images, image interpretation was unaffected.

MR Neurography of Peripheral Nerve Injury in the Presence of Orthopedic Hardware: Technical Considerations.

As the frequency of orthopedic procedures performed each year in the United States continues to increase, evaluation of peripheral nerve injury (PNI) in the presence of pre-existing metallic hardware is in higher demand. Advances in metal artifact reduction techniques have substantially improved the capability to reduce the susceptibility effect at MRI, but few reports have documented the use of MR neurography in the evaluation of peripheral nerves in the presence of orthopedic hardware. This report delineates the challenges of MR neurography around metal given the high spatial resolution often required to adequately depict small peripheral nerves. It offers practical tips, including strategies for prescan assessment and protocol optimization, including use of more conventional two-dimensional proton density and T2-weighted fat-suppressed sequences and specialized three-dimensional techniques, such as reversed free-induction steady-state precession and multispectral imaging, which enable vascular suppression and metal artifact reduction, respectively. Finally, this article emphasizes the importance of real-time monitoring by radiologists to optimize the diagnostic yield of MR neurography in the presence of orthopedic hardware. © RSNA, 2021.

Denoising of diffusion MRI improves peripheral nerve conspicuity and reproducibility.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative diffusion MRI is a promising technique for evaluating peripheral nerve integrity but low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can impede measurement accuracy. PURPOSE: To evaluate principal component analysis (PCA) and generalized spherical deconvolution (genSD) denoising techniques to improve within-subject reproducibility and peripheral nerve conspicuity. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Seven healthy volunteers and three peripheral neuropathy patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T/multiband single-shot echo planar diffusion sequence using multishell 55-direction scheme. ASSESSMENT: Images were processed using four methods: "original" (no denoising), "average" (10 repetitions), "PCA-only," and "PCA + genSD." Tibial and common peroneal nerve segmentations and masks were generated from volunteer diffusion data. Quantitative (SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) values were calculated. Three radiologists qualitatively evaluated nerve conspicuity for each method. The two denoising methods were also performed in three patients with peripheral neuropathies. STATISTICAL TESTS: For healthy volunteers, calculations included SNR and CNRFA (computed using FA values). Coefficient of variation (CV%) of CNRFA quantified within-subject reproducibility. Groups were compared with two-sample t-tests (significance P < 0.05; two-tailed, Bonferroni-corrected). Odds ratios (ORs) quantified the relative rates of each of three radiologists confidently identifying a nerve, per slice, for the four methods. RESULTS: "PCA + genSD" yielded the highest SNR (meanoverall = 14.83 ± 1.99) and tibial and common peroneal nerve CNRFA (meantibial = 3.45, meanperoneal = 2.34) compared to "original" (P SNR < 0.001; P CNR = 0.011) and "PCA-only" (P SNR < 0.001, P CNR < 0.001). "PCA + genSD" had higher within-subject reproducibility (low CV%) for tibial (6.04 ± 1.98) and common peroneal nerves (8.27 ± 2.75) compared to "original" and "PCA-only." The mean FA was higher for "original" than "average" (P < 0.001), but did not differ significantly between "average" and "PCA + genSD" (P = 0.14). "PCA + genSD" had higher tibial and common peroneal nerve conspicuity than "PCA-only" (ORtibial = 2.50, P < 0.001; ORperoneal = 1.86, P < 0.001) and "original" (ORtibial = 2.73, P < 0.001; ORperoneal = 2.43, P < 0.001). DATA CONCLUSION: PCA + genSD denoising method improved SNR, CNRFA , and within-subject reproducibility (CV%) without biasing FA and nerve conspicuity. This technique holds promise for facilitating more reliable, unbiased diffusion measurements of peripheral nerves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1128-1137.

MRI of Hip Arthroplasties: Comparison of Isotropic Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Selective (MAVRIC SL) Acquisitions With a Conventional MAVRIC SL Acquisition.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the quality and diagnostic utility of the following three metal artifact reduction sequences in evaluating hip arthroplasties: conventional multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective (MAVRIC SL), isotropic MAVRIC SL, and reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ninety-three hip arthroplasties (85 total hip replacements and eight hip resurfacings [nine bilateral hips]) in 84 patients (38 men and 46 women; mean age ± SD, 69.1 ± 9.7 years old) were imaged and evaluated. A calibration scan determined the number of spectral bins needed for each implant, and isotropic and conventional MAVRIC SL images were acquired. Reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL scans were acquired for 40 arthroplasties. Two board-certified radiologists blinded to MRI acquisition evaluated images for clinical and image quality features and compared images using a mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression model and odds ratios. Rater agreement was assessed with Gwet agreement coefficients. Scanning times were compared using mixed-effects linear regression. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS. Calibration scans decreased the number of bins needed (median, 12 bins; interquartile range, 10-16 bins). Isotropic MAVRIC SL (mean scanning time, 7 minutes 16 seconds; 95% CI, 7 minutes 7 seconds-7 minutes 25 seconds) acquisitions had the longest scanning time, and conventional (mean, 5 minutes 46 seconds; 95% CI, 5 minutes 37 seconds-5 minutes 55 seconds) and reduced-TR isotropic (5 minutes 28 seconds; 95% CI, 5 minutes 15 seconds-5 minutes 41 seconds) MAVRIC SL acquisitions had scanning times that were similar. Both isotropic and reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL images showed decreased blurring and improved visualization of the synovium and periprosthetic bone compared with conventional MAVRIC SL images (p < 0.001). Isotropic MAVRIC SL acquisitions more effectively improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), visualization of the synovium and periprosthetic bone, and lesion conspicuity and decreased blurring compared with reduced-TR isotropic MAVRIC SL acquisitions (p < 0.032). CONCLUSION. Isotropic MAVRIC SL acquisitions improve SNR, conspicuity of lesions, and visualization of synovium and periprosthetic bone and decrease blurring compared with conventional MAVRIC SL acquisitions.