Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics receiving single-agent carfilzomib in the PX-171-003-A1 study.

Several cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with poor outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM). We prospectively analyzed the impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes during the phase 2 PX-171-003-A1 study of single-agent carfilzomib for relapsed and refractory MM. In the response-evaluable population (257/266), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)/conventional cytogenetic profiles were available for 229 patients; 62 (27.1%) had high-risk cytogenetics--del 17p13, t(4;14) or t(14;16) by interphase FISH or deletion 13 or hypodiploidy by metaphase cytogenetics--and 167 (72.9%) had standard-risk profiles. Generally, baseline characteristics were similar between the subgroups, but International Staging System stage III disease was more common in high- vs standard-risk patients (41.9% vs 27.5%) as was Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1/2 (85.5% vs 68.3%). Overall response was comparable between the subgroups (25.8% vs 24.6%, respectively; P=0.85), while time-to-event end points showed a trend of shorter duration in high-risk patients, including median duration of response (5.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-7.8) vs 8.3 months (95% CI 5.6-12.3)) and overall survival (9.3 (95% CI 6.5-13.0) vs 19.0 months (95% CI 15.4-NE); P=0.0003). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that single-agent carfilzomib is efficacious and has the potential to at least partially overcome the impact of high-risk cytogenetics in heavily pre-treated patients with MM.

Carfilzomib in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: pharmacokinetics and safety.

This phase 2 study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of carfilzomib, a selective proteasome inhibitor, in patients with multiple myeloma and varying degrees of renal impairment, including patients on chronic hemodialysis. Patients were grouped by creatinine clearance: >80 ml/min, 50-80 ml/min, 30-49 ml/min, <30 ml/min and chronic hemodialysis. Carfilzomib was administered on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 in 28-day cycles: 15 mg/m(2) (Cycle 1), 20 mg/m(2) (Cycle 2) and 27 mg/m(2) (Cycles 3+). There were no differences in carfilzomib clearance or exposure among patients with normal renal function and any group with renal impairment. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included anemia (28.0%), thrombocytopenia (20.0%), lymphopenia (18.0%) and fatigue (14.0%). AEs were similar among groups. At 15 mg/m(2), proteasome inhibition up to 85% was observed and did not differ among groups. Although nearly 50% of patients were refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide, end of study partial response or better (overall response rate) was 25.5% with 7.9 months median duration of response. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics and safety of carfilzomib were not influenced by the degree of baseline renal impairment, including in patients on dialysis, and carfilzomib was well tolerated and demonstrated promising efficacy.

Consensus guidelines for the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in systemic light-chain amyloidosis.

This manuscript summarizes the recommendations that emerged from the first Roundtable on Clinical Research in Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis (AL), a meeting sponsored by the Amyloidosis Foundation (Clarkston, MI, USA) to develop a consensus of experts on a modern framework for clinical trial design and drug development in AL. Recent diagnostic and technical advances in AL, and updated consensus guidelines for assessing hematologic and organ responses, enable us to define study populations, appropriate end points, and other criteria for all phases of clinical research. This manuscript provides a framework for the design and conduct of systematic collaborative clinical research in AL to encourage more rapid testing of therapies and to expedite new drug development and approval.

Dermatological complications following initiation of lenalidomide in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Off-label use of lenalidomide (Len) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is becoming increasingly frequent. When compared with thalidomide, Len has been reported to have more potent anti-tumour activity and a better safety profile. However, dermatological side-effects are known to occur with both drugs. Clinical trial design often precludes precise quantification of infrequent toxicities and studies frequently report only grade 3-4 toxicities without a detailed description of rashes, leading to under-recognition of these complications in the community. Careful long-term tracking of late adverse effects with prompt reporting on recognition is imperative while monitoring patients for potential adverse events as we enter the new era of targeted therapies. We present an unusual case of CLL that was complicated by erythema annulare centrifugum and neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet's syndrome) after starting Len.

Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma.

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is more than 1 per thousand annually in the general population and increases further in cancer patients. The risk of VTE is higher in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who receive thalidomide or lenalidomide, especially in combination with dexamethasone or chemotherapy. Various VTE prophylaxis strategies, such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin or aspirin, have been investigated in small, uncontrolled clinical studies. This manuscript summarizes the available evidence and recommends a prophylaxis strategy according to a risk-assessment model. Individual risk factors for thrombosis associated with thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy include age, history of VTE, central venous catheter, comorbidities (infections, diabetes, cardiac disease), immobilization, surgery and inherited thrombophilia. Myeloma-related risk factors include diagnosis and hyperviscosity. VTE is very high in patients who receive high-dose dexamethasone, doxorubicin or multiagent chemotherapy in combination with thalidomide or lenalidomide, but not with bortezomib. The panel recommends aspirin for patients with < or = 1 risk factor for VTE. LMWH (equivalent to enoxaparin 40 mg per day) is recommended for those with two or more individual/myeloma-related risk factors. LMWH is also recommended for all patients receiving concurrent high-dose dexamethasone or doxorubicin. Full-dose warfarin targeting a therapeutic INR of 2-3 is an alternative to LMWH, although there are limited data in the literature with this strategy. In the absence of clear data from randomized studies as a foundation for recommendations, many of the following proposed strategies are the results of common sense or derive from the extrapolation of data from many studies not specifically designed to answer these questions. Further investigation is needed to define the best VTE prophylaxis.

A phase II trial of bryostatin 1 in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Current chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer is relatively ineffective and may be associated with significant toxicity. Bryostatin 1 (bryo 1) influences cell proliferation, intracellular metabolism and signaling, differentiation, and apoptosis in human cancer cell lines via modulation of protein kinase C (PKC) activity. This trial investigates the efficacy and toxicity of bryo 1 as a novel therapeutic agent for patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have had previous 5-fluorouracil therapy. The primary end point was tumor response to bryo 1. Toxicity was also assessed. Twenty-eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled. The mean age was 59 years (range, 38-76), with 16 men and 12 women, and good minority representation (11 African-Americans). The first 10 patients initially received 25 microg/m2 of bryo 1 weekly as a 24-h infusion for 3 weeks of every 4-week cycle, with dose escalation to 35 microg/m2 starting with the second cycle. The remaining patients were started at 35 microg/m2 and escalated to 40 microg/m2, if toxicity was minimal. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for objective tumor response, and complete data on toxicity were collected on 26 patients. No partial or complete tumor responses were observed. All 25 patients had disease progression within four cycles. Myalgia was the most common toxicity. Myelosuppression was not seen. bryo 1 as a weekly 24-h continuous infusion lacks single-agent antitumor activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Toxicity differs from that of traditional chemotherapeutic drugs.

Central catecholaminergic dysfunction and behavioural disorders following hypoxia in adult rats.

Wistar male rats, 3-4 months old, were made to breathe for 6 h a sub-lethal hypoxic atmosphere consisting of 8% oxygen and 92% nitrogen. Following this treatment, these rats were subjected to a series of behavioral and biochemical tests starting 30 days and ending at about 180 days after the hypoxic insult. an age-matched control group was subjected to the same series of tests. The following findings were made at the time interval indicated, relative to controls: (1) At 30-35 days, diurnal (3 h) and nocturnal (12 h) locomotor activities decreased by about 25%. (2) At 40-45 days, amphetamine in the dose range of 0.25-1 mg/kg proved less effective in eliciting an increase in motor activity and stereotypic behavior. (3) At about 50 days, apomorphine in the dose range 0.25-0.5 mg/kg caused an increase in stereotypic behavior. (4) At 60-65 days, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine at the dose of 50 mg/kg caused a more pronounced hypoactive syndrome and a slower rate of recovery of motor activity. (5) At 75-90 days, performance in the active avoidance test was inferior to that of controls. (6) At 180 days, and one hour after a dose of 200 mg/kg alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, the turnover rates of hippocampal norepinephrine and caudate-putamen dopamine were much below control. One may tentatively conclude that one of the effects of hypoxia in adult rats is a lesion producing long-term behavioral disorders which are partly ascribed to dopaminergic and, possibly noradrenergic, dysfunction.