E-cadherin expression on fine-needle aspiration biopsies in primary lung adenocarcinomas is related to tumor differentiation and invasion.

UNLABELLED: E-cadherin, a cell surface molecule that mediates cell-cell adhesion in normal epithelium, has been shown in recent studies of tissue biopsy to be related to tumor differentiation and invasiveness. The aim of the study was to explore if preoperative E-cadherin expression on fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) specimens can predict cell differentiation and mediastinal lymph node spread and therefore tailor treatment in patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma. We studied prospectively the relationship between E-cadherin expression on FNABs and the pathological features of 50 cases of primary lung adenocarcinomas, which were diagnosed cytologically and confirmed histologically post-operatively. Expression of E-cadherin was found in 36 (72%) cases. Decreased expression of E-cadherin was correlated with poor grade adenocarcinomas (low grade 33% vs. 100% in high grade, p < 0.005) and lymph node metastasis (positive 43% vs. negative 93%, p < 0.005). No relationship was found between E-cadherin expression and tumor size. CONCLUSION: E-cadherin expression of FNAB specimens can be helpful in predicting tumor cell differentiation, invasiveness and defining a subpopulation of patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma with possible poor outcome, which should be taken into consideration in the proper management of the disease.

Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis: total or partial fundoplication?

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that partial fundoplication is associated with less incidence of postoperative dysphagia and consequently is more suitable for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and impaired esophageal body motility. The aim of this study was to assess whether outcomes of Toupet fundoplication (TF) are better than those of Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication (NF) in patients with GERD and low-amplitude esophageal peristalsis. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three consecutive patients with proved GERD and amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) less than 30 mmHg were randomly allocated to undergo either TF (19 patients: 11 men, 8 women; mean age: 61.7 +/- 8.7 SD years) or NF (14 patients: 7 men, 7 women; mean age: 59.2 +/- 11.5 years), both by the laparoscopic approach. Pre- and postoperative assessment included clinical questionnaires, esophageal radiology, esophageal transit time study, endoscopy, stationary manometry, and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH testing. RESULTS: Duration of operation was significantly prolonged in the TF arm (TF: 90 +/- 12 minutes versus NF: 67 +/- 15 minutes; p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, the incidences of dysphagia (grades I, II, III) and gas-bloat syndrome were higher after NF than after TF (NF: 57% versus TF: 16%; p < 0.01 and NF: 50% versus TF: 21%; p = 0.02, respectively), but decreased to the same level in both groups at the 1-year followup (NF: 14% versus TF: 16% and NF: 21% versus TF: 16%, respectively). At 3 months postoperatively, patients with NF presented with significantly increased LES pressure than those with TF (p = 0.02), although LES pressure significantly increased after surgery in both groups, as compared with preoperative values. Amplitude of esophageal peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to LES increased postoperatively to the same extent in both groups (TF, preoperatively: 21 +/- 6 mmHg versus postoperatively: 39 +/- 12 mmHg; p < 0.001, and NF, preoperatively: 20 +/- 8 mmHg versus postoperatively: 38 +/- 12 mmHg; p < 0.001). Reflux was abolished in all patients of both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both TF and NF efficiently control reflux in patients with GERD and low amplitude of esophageal peristalsis. Early in the postoperative period, TF is associated with fewer functional symptoms, although at 1 year after surgery those symptoms are reported at similar frequencies after either procedure.

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory versus stationary esophageal manometry in the evaluation of esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Although stationary manometry commonly reveals esophageal body motility disorders in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal function cannot be fully and precisely assessed during normal daily activities by this investigatory modality. AIM: To compare the results of 24-hour ambulatory manometry with those of stationary manometry and to determine the specificity and accuracy of the former to detect motility disorders in patients with GERD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 patients with documented GERD were included in the study. Clinical assessment, upper alimentary endoscopy and stationary manometry as well as 24-hour ambulatory manometry with concomitant 24-hour monitoring of the esophageal pH were performed in each patient. RESULTS: 24-hour ambulatory manometry revealed a significant number of dropped or interrupted esophageal contractions in patients who were found to have only complete peristalsis on stationary manometry. Furthermore, in certain patients, ambulatory manometry detected an increased incidence of dropped or interrupted contractions as compared to those recorded during stationary manometry. Ineffective contractions, suggestive of poor esophageal motility, although absent on stationary manometry, were detected in a large number of patients during a 24-hour period of recording. Also, the amplitude of esophageal contractions was clearly overestimated when evaluated by stationary manometry. CONCLUSIONS: 24-hour ambulatory esophageal manometry reveals esophageal motor abnormalities to a greater extent than those demonstrated at stationary manometry, in patients with GERD. This might be of significance in designing the treatment and predicting possible outcome.

Increasing incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in Crete 1992-2000.

BACKGROUND: There have been recent reports of an increased incidence of cholangiocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cholangiocarcinoma, resident on the island of Crete, diagnosed between 1992 and 2000, were studied. Case ascertainment was enhanced by collaboration of the pathology departments and all gastroenterologists of Crete in providing relevant data. A specially designed patient protocol was used. Crude incidence rates are presented. RESULTS: During the 9-year period 7 patients were diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma of the intrahepatic ducts, 17 with Klatskin and 16 patients with extrahepatic ducts carcinoma. A steady incidence increase of cholangiocarcinoma, irrespective of location, was shown. The estimated incidence rate per three-year period progressively increased from 0.998 to 2.329 and 3.327 per 100,000 for the periods 92-94, 95-97 and 98-2000, respectively. Median survival time was 8.5 months. No significant difference was seen between survival according to the location of cholangiocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: A steady incidence increase of cholangiocarcinoma cases in Crete during the time-period 1992-2000 was shown.