Cognitive prehabilitation for geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery: a PRISMA-P-compliant protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The ageing of the population, as well as advances and improvements in surgery, and anaesthesia have greatly increased the demand for surgical services in geriatric patients. Neurocognitive disorders are the most common complications experienced in the postoperative period by older individuals. Improving perioperative brain health in older adults has become key actions for the multidisciplinary perioperative care teams. This comprehensive systematic review will assess the effectiveness and safety of cognitive prehabilitation programmes prior to surgery on cognitive functional capacity and postoperative cognitive outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was prepared using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. The following key electronic bibliographic databases will be searched from inception to July 2022: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PEDro, PsycINFO, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG database and VIP. We will include randomised controlled trials published in English or Chinese that examine the effects of cognitive prehabilitation programmes on geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery. To construct the search strategy, the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study scheme will be used. Two reviewers will independently complete the study screening, selection, data extraction and quality rating. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative or quantitative synthesis will be conducted based on the final data. The planned start and end dates for the study were 1 September 2021 and 1 August 2023. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval will not be required for this protocol. The results of the final review will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021277191.

Telerehabilitation programmes for patients with cancer and survivors: a protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The global cancer burden is a major public health problem. Cancer rehabilitation is an essential component of survivorship care for preventing complications, decreasing symptoms and improving functional quality of life (QOL). In addition to pre-existing challenges, the COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected cancer rehabilitation programmes and their delivery to patients. This comprehensive systematic review will assess the efficacy and safety of telerehabilitation on functional outcomes and QOL in patients with cancer and survivors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. The following key electronic bibliographic databases will be searched from their inception to April 2021: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English that examine the effects of telerehabilitation programmes on patients with cancer and survivors. The terms 'telerehabilitation', 'neoplasm', 'RCT' and their analogous terms will be used in our search strategy. Two reviewers will independently complete the study screening, selection, data extraction and quality rating. The PEDro scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Narrative or quantitative synthesis will be conducted on the basis of the final data. The planned start and end dates for the study are 1 March 2021 and 1 May 2022, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval will not be required for this review, and the results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021243467.

The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) might be a promising technique in treating insomnia. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the available literature is conducted to offer evidence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rTMS for insomnia, either as monotherapy or as a complementary strategy. METHODS: CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PEDro, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP were searched from earliest record to August 2019. Randomized control trials (RCTs) published in English and Chinese examining effects of rTMS on patients with insomnia were included. Two authors independently completed the article selection, data extraction and rating. Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The RevMan software was used for meta-analysis. The quality of the evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: A total of 36 trials from 28 eligible studies were included, involving a total of 2357 adult participants (mean age, 48.80 years; 45.33% males). Compared with sham rTMS, rTMS was associated with improved PSQI total score (SMD -2.31, 95% CI -2.95 to -1.66; Z = 7.01, P < 0.00001) and scores of seven subscales. Compared to other treatment, rTMS as an adjunct to other treatment was associated with improved PSQI total score (SMD -1.44, 95% CI -2.00 to -0.88; Z = 5.01, P < 0.00001), and may have effects on scores of seven subscales. Compared with other treatment, rTMS was associated with improved Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) total score (SMD -0.63, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.04; Z = 2.08, P = 0.04), and may have a better score in sleep latency, sleep disturbance and hypnotic using of seven subscales. In the three pair of comparisons, the results for polysomnography (PSG) outcomes were varied. In general, rTMS may improve sleep quality through increasing slow wave and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. The rTMS group was more prone to headache than the sham or blank control group (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.85; Z = 2.07, P = 0.04). No severe adverse events were reported. Reporting biases and low and very low grade of some evidences should be considered when interpreting the results of this meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that rTMS may be a safe and effective option for insomnia. Further international, multicenter, high-quality RCTs with more objective, quality of life related and follow-up assessments are needed.

Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for insomnia: a protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation approach, might be a promising technique in the management of insomnia. A systematic review of the available literature on this topic is warranted. The systematic review described in this protocol aims to investigate the efficacy of rTMS as a physical therapy in patients with insomnia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will retrieve relevant literatures across the following electronic bibliographic databases: CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PEDro, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP. A manual search of the reference lists of all relevant articles will be performed for any additional studies. We will include randomised controlled trials published in English and Chinese examining efficacy of rTMS on patients with insomnia. Two reviewers will independently complete the article selection, data extraction and rating. PEDro scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Narrative and quantitative synthesis will be done accordingly. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval will not be required for this review. The results of this review will be disseminated in a peer-review journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018115033.