Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 53(4): 314-321, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29297861

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In radiotherapy, Monte Carlo (MC) methods are considered a gold standard to calculate accurate dose distributions, particularly in heterogeneous tissues. EURADOS organized an international comparison with six participants applying different MC models to a real medical linear accelerator and to one homogeneous and four heterogeneous dosimetric phantoms. AIMS: The aim of this exercise was to identify, by comparison of different MC models with a complete experimental dataset, critical aspects useful for MC users to build and calibrate a simulation and perform a dosimetric analysis. RESULTS: Results show on average a good agreement between simulated and experimental data. However, some significant differences have been observed especially in presence of heterogeneities. Moreover, the results are critically dependent on the different choices of the initial electron source parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This intercomparison allowed the participants to identify some critical issues in MC modelling of a medical linear accelerator. Therefore, the complete experimental dataset assembled for this intercomparison will be available to all the MC users, thus providing them an opportunity to build and calibrate a model for a real medical linear accelerator.


Assuntos
Método de Monte Carlo , Aceleradores de Partículas/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceleradores de Partículas/normas , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia/normas , Algoritmos , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Doses de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...