A genomic survey of sarcomas on sun-exposed skin reveals distinctive candidate drivers and potentially targetable mutations.

Sarcomas on photodamaged skin vary in prognosis and management, but can display overlapping microscopic and immunophenotypic features. Improved understanding of molecular alterations in these tumors may provide diagnostic and therapeutic insights. We characterized 111 cutaneous sarcomatoid malignancies and their counterparts, including primary cutaneous angiosarcoma (n = 7), atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) (n = 21), pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) (n = 17), extracutaneous undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 8), cutaneous leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (n = 5), extracutaneous LMS (n = 9), sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma (spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma) (S-SCC) (n = 24), and conventional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n = 20), by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the StrataNGS panel for copy number variations, mutations, and/or fusions in more than 60 cancer-related genes. TP53 mutations were highly recurrent in most groups. Angiosarcoma displayed previously reported MYC amplifications, as well as CCND1 gains. RB1 mutations were relatively restricted to cutaneous LMS. As previously reported, PIK3CA mutations occurred in AFX, whereas RAS activation was more frequent in PDS. CDKN2A mutations were recurrent in AFX and S-SCC, whereas PDS displayed frequent CDKN2A deletion. S-SCC displayed mutational similarity to conventional SCC. BRCA1/2 mutations were specific to tumors with disease progression. In a subset, we detected potential driver events novel to these tumor types: activating mutations in IDH2 (PDS), MAP2K1 (angiosarcoma, PDS), and JAK1 (S-SCC) and copy gains in FGFR1 (angiosarcoma, S-SCC), KIT (AFX), MET (PDS), and PDGFRA (PDS). Our findings confirm and expand the spectrum of known genomic aberrations, including potential targetable drivers, in cutaneous sarcomatoid malignancies. In addition, certain events are relatively specific to particular tumors within this differential diagnosis and hence might be diagnostically informative.

Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Update on Histopathology and Molecular Alterations.

CONTEXT­: Metaplastic carcinoma is a rare, triple-negative carcinoma of the breast that exhibits transformation of part or all of its glandular carcinomatous component into a nonglandular, or metaplastic, component. The World Health Organization currently recognizes 5 variants of metaplastic carcinoma based on their histologic appearance. OBJECTIVE­: To review the histologic classifications, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and recent laboratory studies of metaplastic breast carcinoma. DATA SOURCES.­: We reviewed recently published studies that collectively examine metaplastic carcinomas, including results from our own research. CONCLUSIONS.­: Metaplastic breast carcinoma has a broad spectrum of histologic patterns, often leading to a broad differential diagnosis. Diagnosis can typically be rendered by a combination of morphology and immunohistochemical staining for high-molecular-weight cytokeratins and p63. Recent studies elucidate new genes and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of metaplastic carcinoma, including the downregulation of CCN6 and WNT pathway gene mutations, and provide a novel MMTV-Cre;Ccn6fl/fl knockout disease-relevant mouse model to test new therapies.

Merkel cell carcinoma arising in association with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: A potential diagnostic pitfall.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma with increased prevalence in patients with immunosuppression or B-cell neoplasms. To the best of our knowledge, an association with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) has not been previously described. In this report, we present two cases of MCC arising in the setting of CTCL. The first case was a female during her 70s with previously diagnosed stage IVA1 Sezary syndrome. Biopsy of a scaly patch showed two distinct abnormal cell populations. The first population consisted of hyperchromatic dermal and epidermotropic lymphocytes, expressing CD3 and CD4 with diminished CD7. The second population consisted of intraepidermal clusters of larger atypical cells that expressed synaptophysin, neurofilament, CK20, and Merkel cell polyomavirus transcript. The combination of findings was consistent with intraepidermal MCC in a background of CTCL. Excision showed residual intraepidermal MCC without dermal involvement. The second case was a male during his 50s with a longstanding history of mycosis fungoides, who presented with a new lesion on his right thigh. Biopsy and excision showed dermal MCC without secondary involvement by CTCL. Our cases show that MCC may rarely occur in the setting of T-cell lymphoma, and that intraepidermal MCC may mimic epidermotropic T-cells.