RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify the main predictors for corneal graft failure in patients who underwent retransplantation. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional research with a quantitative and analytical approach, conducted based on data from secondary sources of a Human Eye Tissue Bank (HETB) in Northeast Brazil. Data were collected from the medical charts of all patients transplanted between January 2010 and December 2014. Descriptive statistics were used for the univariate analysis by means of absolute and relative frequencies and means. For the inferential analysis, the chi-square (X²) and the Fisher's Exact tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 241 records were reviewed, representing 258 keratoplasties, of which 27 (10.46%) were retransplantations due to corneal graft failure. Of the total, 55.56% of the individuals were female, with a mean age of 58.56 years, 55.56% of the population was brown, and the highest relative frequency of housing found was in the Central Mesoregion. Of the corneal graft failure cases, 88.89% were due to late failure, 30.77% of cases were classified as pseudophakic and 11.57% as aphakic. Through inferential analysis, a statistical association was obtained among the variable "corneal graft failure" and mesoregion of the state, presence of glaucoma, vascularization, and classification of the eye. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of keratoplasty is of multifactorial nature. Factors such as mesoregion of the State (place of residence), glaucoma, corneal vascularization, and aphakic eyes represent predictors for graft failure in the analyzed sample.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obtaining organs for transplants through a deceased donor occurs exclusively through donation. However, some open protocols with potential donors do not become effective donors due to medical refusal. Our aim was to identify the profile of non-donors of organs and tissues due to medical refusal in a state reference service for transplants. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection from medical records of patients who died and had a protocol opened to evaluate brain death and procurement of organs and tissues in 2019. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 27 patients, the majority of whom were female, aged over 71 years, had primary education, and were married. The main causes of medical refusal were age above the recommended age and septicemia. Brain death was mostly confirmed within 12 hours, and the main cause of hospitalization was a vascular event. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the profile of non-donors due to medical refusal is necessary for services to identify possible misattributed medical contraindications and thus contribute to reducing the disproportion between supply and demand for organs and tissues for transplants.
RESUMO
Introduction: Organ transplantation is one of the most successful advances in modern medicine. However, a legal system is necessary for its practice to be free from ethical flaws and to respect donors, recipients, and family members. Objective: To map the global legislation regulating the donation, capture and distribution processes of organs and tissues from deceased donors for transplants. Method: A scoping review according to the Joanna Briggs Institute was conducted in the following databases: Medline, CINAHL, Virtual Health Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, and EMBASE, as well as gray literature, and reported according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Results: We identified 3302 records, of which 77 were analyzed which enabled mapping the type of consent adopted and the existence of current legislation for harvesting organs and tissues after circulatory and brain death. Conclusion: Opt-out consent predominates in Europe, and there is harvesting after brain and circulatory death. Opt-out predominates in the Americas, while Opt-in and harvesting of organs and tissues after brain death predominate in Asia and Oceania. The procurement of organs and tissues from deceased donors is practically non-existent in Africa.
