An overview of the pharmacokinetics of cilomilast (Ariflo), a new, orally active phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

The oral pharmacokinetics of cilomilast (Ariflo) were investigated in five separate studies in healthy volunteers. Cilomilast was rapidly absorbed, and pharmacokinetics were dose proportional after single and repeat dosing. The elimination half-life was 7 to 8 hours; accordingly, steady state was reached on the 3rd day of dosing. The degree of accumulation following repeat twice-daily dosing was predictable from the data following a single dose. Although systemic exposure (AUC) was, on average, 21% higher in elderly (65-84 years) compared with young subjects, values for Cmax and t(1/2) were similar, and no difference in tolerability was noted. Single and repeat doses of cilomilast up to and including 15 mg (dosed before or taken between meals) were well tolerated. Dosing with food reduced the rate of absorption without affecting total bioavailability. Hence, tolerability was optimal in the fed state; repeat doses up to and including 30 mg twice daily aftermeals were well tolerated following dose titration.

Cilomilast: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with digoxin.

BACKGROUND: Cilomilast is an orally active, selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor currently in clinical development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the tolerability and steady-state pharmacokinetics of cilomilast and digoxin when coadministered at standard therapeutic doses in healthy adults. METHODS: In an initial, open-label phase, healthy young adults received cilomilast 15 mg BID for 5 days. After a 7-day washout period, subjects entered a double-blind, crossover phase during which they received oral digoxin (375 microg once daily) for 2 consecutive 14-day periods with no intervening washout period. Cilomilast 15 mg BID or placebo was coadministered during the first 14-day period. Subjects then crossed over to the alternative treatment for the second 14-day period. Blood and urine samples were collected at appropriate times for evaluation of digoxin and cilomilast steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters. The size of the study was sufficient to achieve 90% power to correctly exclude an effect of cilomilast. RESULTS: Twelve of the 16 subjects enrolled completed the study. There were 4 withdrawals--1 due to noncompliance, 1 due to a positive drug screening, and 2 due to adverse events. At steady state, cilomilast 15 mg BID had no significant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of digoxin, with 90% CIs for both primary end points--area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) over a 24-hour dosing interval and minimum plasma concentration--completely contained within the specified interval for equivalence (0.80-1.25). A mean reduction in maximum observed plasma concentration of digoxin of 11% was observed during coadministration with cilomilast, and time to maximum concentration was delayed by a median of 1 hour, suggesting a small reduction in the rate of digoxin absorption. Digoxin did not appear to markedly affect cilomilast steady-state pharmacokinetics. The most frequently reported adverse event was headache. CONCLUSIONS: Cilomilast 15 mg BID had no clinically significant effect on steady-state AUC or on predose trough plasma concentrations of digoxin (375 microg once daily). The steady-state pharmacokinetics of cilomilast 15 mg BID were similar whether administered alone or with digoxin at steady state (375 microg once daily).

Bioavailability of the oral selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor cilomilast.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the absolute bioavailability of cilomilast, and assess the effects of food, dosing time, and coadministration of antacid agents on its bioavailability and pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. SETTING: Clinical pharmacology unit. DESIGN: Five prospective pharmacokinetic studies: one single-blind, dose-escalating, placebo-controlled trial; four open-label, randomized studies. SUBJECTS: Ninety-six healthy adult volunteers who were nonsmokers. INTERVENTION: In the first study, four subjects received intravenous cilomilast 1, 2, and 4 mg. In the second study, 16 subjects received oral cilomilast 15 mg or intravenous cilomilast 4 mg. In the other three studies, a total of 76 subjects were given single oral 15-mg doses; one study compared its effects in fed versus fasted subjects, one looked for differences of morning versus evening dosing, and one examined coadministration with aluminum hydroxide-magnesium hydroxide. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After intravenous administration of cilomilast, plasma concentrations increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner; the half-life, approximately 6.5 hours, was dose independent. Cilomilast clearance and volume of distribution were small. After oral dosing, the absolute bioavailability was consistently close to 100%. Absorption was slower in fed subjects than in fasted (median 2-hr delay in time to reach maximum plasma concentration, average 39% reduction in maximum plasma concentration), but the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (systemic availability) was unaffected. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not influenced by time of dosing or coadministration of antacid. CONCLUSION: The absolute bioavailability of oral cilomilast was 100%; it was not adversely affected by time of dosing or coadministration with food or antacid.

Linear pharmacokinetic behavior of ropinirole during multiple dosing in patients with Parkinson's disease.

The objectives of this study were to measure the pharmacokinetics of ropinirole at steady state when the drug is used as an adjunct to L-dopa and evaluate the long-term tolerability of ropinirole in this indication. Twenty-four patients who were taking L-dopa for Parkinson's disease and experiencing a lack of symptomatic control were recruited. Patients received open-label adjunctive treatment with ropinirole for up to 2 years. The starting dose was 0.5 mg bid, which could be titrated to a maximum of 6.0 mg tid. Ropinirole demonstrated approximately dose-linear pharmacokinetics at steady state; corresponding values were higher during tid than bid dosing. A reduction in mean L-dopa dose was maintained throughout the trial. The combination of L-dopa and ropinirole was generally well tolerated, with only 1 patient withdrawing from treatment because of adverse events. Thus, ropinirole shows approximately linear steady-state pharmacokinetics and a good safety profile when administered with L-dopa.

Paroxetine does not affect the cardiac safety and pharmacokinetics of terfenadine in healthy adult men.

Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole can cause dangerous increases in plasma concentrations of the H-1 antagonist terfenadine. In light of recent reports that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants may be weak CYP3A4 inhibitors, this study was designed to investigate the effects of paroxetine on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of terfenadine. Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in a randomized open-label, two-period, steady-state crossover study. Terfenadine (60 mg twice daily for 8 days) was administered alone and with paroxetine at steady state (20 mg once daily for 15 days, with terfenadine on days 8 through 15). Extensive electrocardiogram monitoring was conducted throughout, and terfenadine and carboxyterfenadine pharmacokinetics were assessed at the end of each treatment period. One subject withdrew because of adverse experiences related to paroxetine, but the other 11 subjects completed the study uneventfully. On the final day of coadministration, the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) was unaltered compared with terfenadine dosed alone; maximum QTc values (mean [SEM]) were 404 (4) and 405 (5) msec, respectively. Terfenadine pharmacokinetics were also unchanged; geometric mean steady-state area under the curve (AUC)tau values were 30.0 ng.hr/mL during coadministration compared with 30.8 ng.hr/mL when dosed alone (p > 0.05). The corresponding Cmax values were 3.68 and 3.64 ng/mL (p > 0.05). There was, however, a small (on average 17-20%), unexplained reduction in the steadystate Cmax and AUCtau of carboxyterfenadine during coadministration with paroxetine. In conclusion, paroxetine does not affect the pharmacokinetics or cardiovascular effects of terfenadine. The small reduction in carboxyterfenadine plasma concentrations is unlikely to be important clinically.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of ascending intravenous doses of granisetron, a novel 5-HT3 antagonist, in healthy human subjects.

The pharmacokinetics and tolerance of granisetron, a novel 5HT3-receptor antagonist which is under development as an anti-emetic agent have been studied after administration of single 30 min intravenous infusions to three groups of 8 healthy male subjects, in a series of placebo-controlled ascending dose studies (50, 80, 100 and 130 micrograms.kg-1 to group 1; 150, 180, 200 and 230 micrograms.kg-1 to group 2 and 270 and 300 micrograms.kg-1 to group 3). Plasma and urine samples were analysed for granisetron by HPLC with fluorimetric detection. Administration of granisetron was well tolerated by the volunteers and there were no serious adverse effects reported. Pharmacokinetic parameters and dose-normalised plasma levels appeared to be independent of dose in the range 50 to 300 micrograms.kg-1, although there was extensive inter-subject variability. Granisetron was extensively distributed, with mean volumes of distribution ranging from 186-264 l at the various doses. Total plasma clearance was, in general, rapid (mean values of 37.0 to 49.9 l.h-1) and predominantly non-renal, with most subjects excreting less than 20% of the dose unchanged in urine. Mean t1/2 values ranged from 4.1 to 6.3 h and MRT from 5.2 to 8.1 h.

A pharmacokinetic study of granisetron (BRL 43694A), a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist: correlation with anti-emetic response.

As part of an open dose-ranging study, the pharmacokinetics of granisetron (BRL 43694A), a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist given by the i.v. route, was studied in 18 patients receiving highly emetogenic cytotoxic drugs, predominantly cisplatin, either alone or in combination with other cytostatic agents. All patients received 30-min infusions of granisetron at a dose of 40 micrograms/kg. Nine showed complete absence of the gastrointestinal side effects normally associated with cisplatin, and in the majority of the remaining patients, the onset and severity of nausea was significantly modified. No acute side effects were observed at this dose and the drug was well tolerated in all cases. Peak plasma concentrations and area under the curve (AUC) values for granisetron showed considerable inter-patient variation. Higher plasma levels of granisetron were observed at 5 h in responding patients compared with those in whom the drug was ineffective in controlling emesis (P less than 0.05). AUC values were higher in responding patients, but this difference was not statistically significant. There was apparently no defined plasma concentration threshold for the drug's anti-emetic effect in these patients. Granisetron seems to be an effective and safe anti-emetic in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further exploration of its dose scheduling and pharmacokinetic profile is warranted.

A review of the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in man.

Paroxetine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, and appears to undergo first-pass metabolism which is partially saturable. Consistent with its lipophilic amine character, paroxetine is extensively distributed into tissues. Its plasma protein binding at therapeutically relevant concentrations is about 95%. Paroxetine is eliminated by metabolism involving oxidation, methylation, and conjugation. All of these factors lead to wide interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine. Renal clearance of the compound is negligible. The major metabolites of paroxetine are conjugates which do not compromise its selectivity nor contribute to the clinical response. Ascending single-dose studies reveal that the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine are non-linear to a limited extent in most subjects and to a marked degree in only a few. Also, steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters are not predictable from single-dose data. In many subjects, daily administration of 20-50 mg of paroxetine leads to little or no disproportionality in plasma levels with dose, although in a few subjects this phenomenon is evident. Steady-state plasma concentrations are generally achieved within 7 to 14 days. The terminal half-life is about one day, although there is a wide intersubject variability (e.g. with 30 mg, a range of 7-65 hours was observed in a group of 28 healthy young subjects). In elderly subjects there is wide interindividual variation in steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters, with statistically significantly higher plasma concentrations and slower elimination than in younger subjects, although there is a large degree of overlap in the ranges of corresponding parameters. In severe renal impairment higher plasma levels of paroxetine are achieved than in healthy individuals after single dose. In moderate hepatic impairment the pharmacokinetics after single doses are similar to those of normal subjects. Paroxetine is not a general inducer or inhibitor of hepatic oxidation processes, and has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs examined. Its metabolism and pharmacokinetics are to some degree affected by the induction or inhibition of drug metabolizing enzyme(s). From a pharmacokinetic standpoint, drug interactions involving paroxetine are considered unlikely to be a frequent occurrence. Data available have failed to reveal any correlation between plasma concentrations of paroxetine and its clinical effects (either efficacy or adverse events).

Pharmacokinetics and anti-emetic efficacy of BRL43694, a new selective 5HT-3 antagonist.

Twenty patients receiving a variety of emetogenic cytotoxics (including cisplatin in 5) were given a single i.v. infusion of 40 micrograms kg-1 of BRL43694 (as the hydrochloride salt) in successive groups of 3-4 patients between 0-6 hours after chemotherapy. Eleven patients were completely protected from vomiting; 9 had mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, but none severe enough to require alternative anti-emetic 'rescue'. In 4 of the patients in whom BRL43694 was delayed until 4-6 h after chemotherapy, vomiting had already begun; in each case immediate termination of vomiting occurred when BRL43694 was infused. No adverse effects attributable to the anti-emetic were observed. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters in 14 patients in whom plasma assay data are available were: Maximum observed concentration = 30.7 ng ml-1; terminal phase half-life = 8.96 h; total body clearance = 0.376 (1 h-1) kg-1; apparent volume of distribution = 2.85 l kg-1. This study shows BRL43694 to be an effective and well tolerated anti-emetic. Further studies aimed at defining an optimal dose and schedule for use against the most emetogenic cytotoxics are in progress.