Willingness to accept chemotherapy and attitudes towards costs of cancer treatment; A multisite survey study in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In the past years, interest in patient treatment preferences is growing. Our objectives were: (1) to assess and compare the minimal required benefit for patients with cancer, patients without cancer and healthcare professionals to make chemotherapy acceptable and (2) to obtain insight into attitudes towards societal costs of cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective survey consisting of hypothetical scenarios among patients with cancer, patients without cancer and healthcare professionals. Participants were asked to indicate the minimal desired benefit in terms of chance of cure, life prolongation and symptom relief which would make intensive and mild chemotherapy regimens acceptable. In two other scenarios, attitudes towards monthly costs for chemotherapy treatment were examined. RESULTS: The minimal benefit required to make chemotherapy acceptable did not differ between cancer and non-cancer patients, with respect to chance of cure (mean 57%), life prolongation (median 24 months) and symptom relief (mean 50%); healthcare providers were likely to accept the same chemotherapy regimen at lower thresholds (p < 0.01). Education level was an important explanatory variable and the differences between patients and healthcare professionals disappeared when corrected for education level. Opinions about the maximum acceptable costs for chemotherapy displayed a large spread between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal benefits to accept chemotherapy were not different between cancer and non-cancer patients, but are beyond what can generally can be achieved. Healthcare professionals were willing to accept chemotherapy for less benefit. This difference may be attributed to a difference in education level between the groups. Healthcare professionals rated the maximum acceptable societal cost for chemotherapy lower than patients.

Pharmacokinetics of rifampin and clarithromycin in patients treated for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection.

In a randomized controlled trial in Ghana, treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection with streptomycin (SM)-rifampin (RIF) for 8 weeks was compared with treatment with SM-RIF for 4 weeks followed by treatment with RIF-clarithromycin (CLA) for 4 weeks. The extent of the interaction of RIF and CLA combined on the pharmacokinetics of the two compounds is unknown in this population and was therefore studied in a subset of patients. Patients received CLA at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight once daily, rounded to the nearest 125 mg. RIF was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg, rounded to the nearest 150 mg. SM was given at a dose of 15 mg/kg once daily as an intramuscular injection. Plasma samples were drawn at steady state and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with the MW/Pharm (version 3.60) program. Comedication with CLA resulted in a 60% statistically nonsignificant increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for RIF of 25.8 mg x h/liter (interquartile ratio [IQR], 21.7 to 31.5 mg x h/liter), whereas the AUC of RIF was 15.2 mg x h/liter (IQR, 15.0 to 17.5 mg x h/liter) in patients comedicated with SM (P = 0.09). The median AUCs of CLA and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14OH-CLA) were 2.9 mg x h/liter (IQR, 1.5 to 3.8 mg x h/liter) and 8.0 mg x h/liter (IQR, 6.7 to 8.6 mg x h/liter), respectively. The median concentration of CLA was above the MIC of M. ulcerans, but that of 14OH-CLA was not. In further clinical studies, a dose of CLA of 7.5 mg/kg twice daily should be used (or with an extended-release formulation, 15 mg/kg should be used) to ensure higher levels of exposure to CLA and an increase in the time above the MIC compared to those achieved with the currently used dose of 7.5 mg/kg once daily.