RESUMO
PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) for patients with non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) remains in question. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate SBRT treatment outcomes in NSBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible studies were retrieved from Medline, Embase, Scielo, the Cochrane Library, and annual meeting proceedings until July 6, 2023. We adhered to the PRISMA and MOOSE guideline recommendations. Quantitative synthesis was performed using a random effects model. RESULTS: Seven retrospective studies, with a total of 807 patients (1048 lesions) treated with stereotactic body radiation were included, with median follow-up ranging from 7.6-26.5 months. The most common stereotactic body radiation sites were pelvis (39.2%), ribs (25.8%), femur (16.7%), and humerus/shoulder region (8.7%). At 1-year, the LF and FR were 7% (95%CI 5.5-8.5%; I2=0, n= 75/1048), and 5.3% (95%CI 3-7.5%;I2=0, n= 65/1010). The 2-year cumulative LF incidence was 12.1% (95% CI: 10-15.5%). The OS and PFS at 1-year were 82% (95%CI 75-88%;I2=82%, n= 746/867), and 33.5%(95%CI 26-41%;I2=0%, n= 51/152), with a median of 20.2 months (95%CI: 10.9-49.1 months) and 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.3%) for OS and PFS, respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between planning target volume and fracture rate (p<0.05). Ribs 2.5% followed by the femur 1.9% (95%CI:0-6.1%) were the most common fracture sites. The occurrence of pain flare, fatigue and dermatitis were 7 %, 5.4 %, and 0.65 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation proves both safety and efficacy for non-spine bone metastases and serious complications (grade 3) are infrequent. Careful consideration of target volume is crucial due to its link with a higher fracture risk.
RESUMO
Background: The safety and effectiveness of moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer were demonstrated by several trials. This study aimed to evaluate the current patterns of practice and prescription preference about moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy to assess possible aspects that affect the decision-making process regarding the use of fractionation in breast cancer patients in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). We also aimed to identify factors that can restrain the utilization of moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer. Materials an methods: Radiation oncologists from LAC were invited to contribute to this study. A 38-question survey was used to evaluate their opinions. Results: A total of 173 radiation oncologists from 13 countries answered the questionnaire. The majority of respondents (84.9%) preferred moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy as their first choice in cases of whole breast irradiation. Whole breast plus regional nodal irradiation, post-mastectomy (chest wall and regional nodal irradiation) without reconstruction, and post-mastectomy (chest wall and regional node irradiation) with reconstruction hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy was preferred by 72.2% 71.1%, and 53.7% of respondents, respectively. Breast cancer stage, and flap-based breast reconstruction were the factors associated with absolute contraindications for the use of hypofractionated schedules. Conclusion: Even though moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer is considered a new standard to the vast majority of the patients, its unrestricted application in clinical practice across LAC still faces reluctance.
