Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Animals (Basel) ; 13(16)2023 Aug 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37627439

RESUMO

Periodontal disease is one of the main affections of the oral cavity of dogs. Its main complication is the formation of periapical abscess, which, when affecting the maxillary canine teeth, can lead to the formation of oronasal fistulae. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of self-curing glass ionomer cement, covered by photopolymerizable adhesive, as a protective element for mucoperiosteal or gingival flap sutures in oral surgery of dogs. We studied 15 dogs from the clinical routine of the dental service of a teaching veterinary hospital, which needed oral surgeries to correct oronasal fistulae, defects or oral cavity communications, regardless of the causal agent. Group one (G1) was composed of seven animals that presented oronasal fistulae after the extraction of maxillary canine teeth compromised by severe periodontal disease. These fistulae were reduced by the double-mucoperiosteal-flap technique, 15 days after the dental extraction. Group two (G2) was composed of five other dogs that presented oronasal fistulae after the extraction of maxillary canine teeth compromised by severe periodontal disease. In this group, the fistulae were reduced by the single-flap technique, immediately after the dental extraction. Group three (G3) was composed of three animals, two of which presented oronasal fistulae due to maxillary fracture and the third one after excision of oral neoplasia. In all groups, simple interrupted sutures were used with 3.0 nylon, and a thin layer of self-curing glass ionomer cement was applied immediately over the operated area. After cement's settling time, a thin layer of photopolymerizable adhesive was applied to the already polymerized cement. In G1, the protective cement was removed on average at 15 (±2) postoperative days, in G2 at 6 (±1) days and in G3 at 11 (±9) days. In the postoperative period, the animals received antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs, and they received their usual dry dog food diet. No Elizabethan collar or any other protective measure was used for suturing or the surgical wound. The result was healing of 100% of the oronasal fistulae, without suture dehiscence or the need for new surgical interventions. Thus, it was concluded that the use of self-curing glass ionomer cement covered by photopolymerizable adhesive was fully satisfactory, providing protection of sutures and surgical wounds and showing the potential for routine use in oral surgery in dogs.

2.
Drug Chem Toxicol ; 40(4): 484-488, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28147701

RESUMO

Cynara scolymus L., popularly known as artichoke, is consumed as food and used as tea infusions for pharmacological purposes to treat liver dysfunctions and other conditions. Scientific data on the safety and protective effect of artichoke in human-derived liver cells is missing. This study investigated the genotoxic and modulatory effect of a liophilized extract suspended in water of C. scolymus L. leaves. Four extract concentrations (0.62, 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 mg/mL) were evaluated using the comet assay on human hepatocyte cultures, HepG2 cells. Genotoxicity was assessed after two treatment periods, 1 and 24 h. Antigenotoxicity was evaluated against oxidative lesions induced by hydrogen peroxide in pre-, simultaneous and post-treatment protocols. Artichoke leaves aqueous extract induced genotoxic effects in HepG2 cells after 1- and 24-h treatments. In turn, extract concentrations of 0.62, 1.25 and 2.5 mg/mL, exhibited a protective effect in pretreatment, compared to hydrogen peroxide alone. However, in simultaneous and post-treatment protocols, only the lowest concentration reduced the frequency of DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide. In addition, in the simultaneous treatment protocol, the highest artichoke extract concentration increased hydrogen peroxide genotoxicity. It can be concluded that artichoke is genotoxic, in vitro, to HepG2 cells, but can also modulate hydrogen peroxide DNA damage.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/efeitos adversos , Cynara scolymus/química , Dano ao DNA , Células Hep G2/metabolismo , Estresse Oxidativo , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Folhas de Planta/química , Antioxidantes/isolamento & purificação , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Brasil , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Ensaio Cometa , Cynara scolymus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Liofilização , Células Hep G2/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepatócitos , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/agonistas , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/antagonistas & inibidores , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/toxicidade , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Mutagênicos/química , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Agricultura Orgânica , Oxidantes/agonistas , Oxidantes/antagonistas & inibidores , Oxidantes/toxicidade , Extratos Vegetais/isolamento & purificação , Extratos Vegetais/metabolismo , Folhas de Planta/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Substâncias Protetoras/efeitos adversos , Substâncias Protetoras/isolamento & purificação , Substâncias Protetoras/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...