Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Plant J ; 92(1): 95-109, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28715118

RESUMO

The transition from flowering to fruit production, namely fruit set, is crucial to ensure successful sexual plant reproduction. Although studies have described the importance of hormones (i.e. auxin and gibberellins) in controlling fruit set after pollination and fertilization, the role of microRNA-based regulation during ovary development and fruit set is still poorly understood. Here we show that the microRNA159/GAMYB1 and -2 pathway (the miR159/GAMYB1/2 module) is crucial for tomato ovule development and fruit set. MiR159 and SlGAMYBs were expressed in preanthesis ovaries, mainly in meristematic tissues, including developing ovules. SlMIR159-overexpressing tomato cv. Micro-Tom plants exhibited precocious fruit initiation and obligatory parthenocarpy, without modifying fruit shape. Histological analysis showed abnormal ovule development in such plants, which led to the formation of seedless fruits. SlGAMYB1/2 silencing in SlMIR159-overexpressing plants resulted in misregulation of pathways associated with ovule and female gametophyte development and auxin signalling, including AINTEGUMENTA-like genes and the miR167/SlARF8a module. Similarly to SlMIR159-overexpressing plants, SlGAMYB1 was downregulated in ovaries of parthenocarpic mutants with altered responses to gibberellins and auxin. SlGAMYBs likely contribute to fruit initiation by modulating auxin and gibberellin responses, rather than their levels, during ovule and ovary development. Altogether, our results unveil a novel function for the miR159-targeted SlGAMYBs in regulating an agronomically important trait, namely fruit set.


Assuntos
Regulação da Expressão Gênica de Plantas , MicroRNAs/genética , Reguladores de Crescimento de Plantas/metabolismo , Solanum lycopersicum/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo , Regulação para Baixo , Flores/citologia , Flores/genética , Flores/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Frutas/citologia , Frutas/genética , Frutas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Giberelinas/metabolismo , Ácidos Indolacéticos/metabolismo , Solanum lycopersicum/citologia , Solanum lycopersicum/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Óvulo Vegetal/citologia , Óvulo Vegetal/genética , Óvulo Vegetal/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Proteínas de Plantas/genética , Proteínas de Plantas/metabolismo , Polinização , RNA de Plantas/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/genética
2.
J Exp Bot ; 63(15): 5689-703, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22915742

RESUMO

Despite the wide use of plant regeneration for biotechnological purposes, the signals that allow cells to become competent to assume different fates remain largely unknown. Here, it is demonstrated that the Regeneration1 (Rg1) allele, a natural genetic variation from the tomato wild relative Solanum peruvianum, increases the capacity to form both roots and shoots in vitro; and that the gibberellin constitutive mutant procera (pro) presented the opposite phenotype, reducing organogenesis on either root-inducing medium (RIM) or shoot-inducing medium (SIM). Mutants showing alterations in the formation of specific organs in vitro were the auxin low-sensitivity diageotropica (dgt), the lateral suppresser (ls), and the KNOX-overexpressing Mouse ears (Me). dgt failed to form roots on RIM, Me increased shoot formation on SIM, and the high capacity for in vitro shoot formation of ls contrasted with its recalcitrance to form axillary meristems. Interestingly, Rg1 rescued the in vitro organ formation capacity in proRg1 and dgtRg1 double mutants and the ex vitro low lateral shoot formation in pro and ls. Such epistatic interactions were also confirmed in gene expression and histological analyses conducted in the single and double mutants. Although Me phenocopied the high shoot formation of Rg1 on SIM, it failed to increase rooting on RIM and to rescue the non-branching phenotype of ls. Taken together, these results suggest REGENERATION1 and the DELLA mutant PROCERA as controlling a common competence to assume distinct cell fates, rather than the specific induction of adventitious roots or shoots, which is controlled by DIAGEOTROPICA and MOUSE EARS, respectively.


Assuntos
Diferenciação Celular/genética , Variação Genética/fisiologia , Proteínas de Plantas/genética , Raízes de Plantas/fisiologia , Brotos de Planta/fisiologia , Solanum lycopersicum/genética , Alelos , Cotilédone/anatomia & histologia , Cotilédone/genética , Cotilédone/fisiologia , Técnicas de Cultura , Flores/anatomia & histologia , Flores/genética , Flores/fisiologia , Genótipo , Giberelinas/metabolismo , Ácidos Indolacéticos/metabolismo , Solanum lycopersicum/anatomia & histologia , Solanum lycopersicum/fisiologia , Meristema/anatomia & histologia , Meristema/genética , Meristema/fisiologia , Mutação , Fenótipo , Reguladores de Crescimento de Plantas/metabolismo , Folhas de Planta/anatomia & histologia , Folhas de Planta/genética , Folhas de Planta/fisiologia , Raízes de Plantas/anatomia & histologia , Raízes de Plantas/genética , Brotos de Planta/anatomia & histologia , Brotos de Planta/genética , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas , Regeneração/genética , Plântula/anatomia & histologia , Plântula/genética , Plântula/fisiologia , Transdução de Sinais/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...