Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 48(4): 585-595, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934992

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine (1.8 mg mL-1; Simbadol) following subcutaneous (SC) administration in horses. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover trial. ANIMALS: A group of six healthy adult horses weighing 521-602 kg. METHODS: On three occasions, Simbadol (0.005 mg kg-1; treatment S5), (0.0025 mg kg-1; treatment S2.5) or saline (treatment SAL) were administered SC at least 7 days apart in random order. Electrical nociceptive threshold (ENT) measured on the neck region, physiologic variables, locomotor activity, degree of restlessness and presence of excitatory signs were measured at baseline and for up to 48 hours after injection. Blood was collected for pharmacokinetic analysis at the same time intervals and plasma buprenorphine concentration (Cp) measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Buprenorphine was quantifiable in all horses from 15 minutes after administration up to 8-12 hours. ENT was significantly increased in treatment S2.5 compared with treatment SAL at 0.75-6 hours after treatment. Increase in locomotor activity and compulsive behavior were recorded in all horses after Simbadol, and degree of restlessness was significantly higher in treatment S5 than SAL for a sustained time. Gastrointestinal motility significantly decreased in all horses after Simbadol and returned to baseline by 16 hours after treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In horses, SC Simbadol was rapidly absorbed and Cp decreased rapidly. Side effects commonly seen in horses after opioids were observed in both Simbadol treatments, but degree of opioid-induced excitement lasted significantly longer in treatment S5. Simbadol (0.0025 mg kg-1) SC has the potential to be used clinically to treat pain in horses. However, at this dose, duration of antinociceptive effects was not longer than that reported for conventional buprenorphine, and side effects, including reduction in gastrointestinal motility and increased locomotor activity, were documented.


Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Animais , Buprenorfina/farmacologia , Cavalos , Dor/veterinária , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Am J Vet Res ; 70(6): 703-9, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19496658

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of remifentanil administered by use of a constant rate infusion on the predicted plasma concentration (Cp(predicted)) of propofol required to prevent awareness in 50% of anesthetized dogs (Cp50(predicted)). ANIMALS: 6 healthy dogs. PROCEDURES: Each dog received 2 treatments (1-week interval): induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol alone and induction of anesthesia with propofol and maintenance of anesthesia by use of propofol and a constant rate infusion of remifentanil (0.3 microg/kg/min). To induce anesthesia, propofol was administered by use of a target-controlled infusion system to achieve Cp(predicted) of 6.0 microg/mL. Propofol Cp(predicted) was adjusted in 0.5 microg/mL increments or decrements; the motor response to a supramaximal electrical nociceptive stimulus was assessed after each change to determine Cp50(predicted) (mean of the highest Cp(predicted) at which gross purposeful movement was detected in response to stimulation and the lowest Cp(predicted) at which such movement was not detected). RESULTS: Mean +/- SD duration of anesthesia for dogs receiving propofol (148 +/- 35 minutes) and dogs receiving propofol-remifentanil treatment (141 +/- 28 minutes) did not differ. Overall mean propofol Cp(predicted) for induction of anesthesia was 6.0 +/- 0.5 microg/mL. For maintenance of anesthesia, propofol Cp50(predicted) was significantly reduced following addition of remifentanil to the protocol (2.0 +/- 0.5 microg/mL vs 0.9 +/- 0.4 microg/mL; 55% decrease). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In nonpremedicated dogs, propofol Cp50(predicted) of 6.0 microg/mL may be recommended for induction of anesthesia. Propofol requirements for maintaining target-controlled infusion system-based anesthesia were reduced via infusion of remifentanil at a rate of 0.3 microg/kg/min.


Assuntos
Anestesia/veterinária , Cães , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Piperidinas/farmacologia , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Propofol/farmacologia , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/farmacologia , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Masculino , Remifentanil
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...