Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 41(1)2021 Feb 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33513585

RESUMO

A comparison exercise of Latin American and Caribbean Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories (SSDLs) was jointly organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Ionizing Radiation Metrology Laboratory at the Federal University of Pernambuco (LMRI-DEN/UFPE). This exercise was organized during an IAEA regional meeting on the review and update of calibration capabilities in Latin America, held in Recife, during the period from 23 to 27 April 2018 under the technical cooperation project ME-RLA 9085-170572. Fifteen participating SSDLs were required to irradiate optically stimulated personal dosimeters in terms of the personal dose equivalent Hp(10) in137Cs radiation quality. In addition, the IAEA Dosimetry Laboratory in Seibersdorf, Austria, and the National Physical Laboratory in Teddington, Middlesex, UK participated in this exercise as reference institutes. Each participant received 10 dosimeters that were hand-carried directly to the SSDL. Two nominal dose values of 2 mSv and 4 mSv were selected for this exercise. The participants irradiated the dosimeters using the setup and the procedures which are normally used in their standard laboratory for Hp(10) dosimeter irradiations. The dosimeters were evaluated as they were received by the coordinating laboratory, using a single BeOSL Reader. The results show that, except for one laboratory, the differences between the dosimeter reading and the assigned values were within 10%; this is consistent with the expanded uncertainty. The results indicate that most of the participant laboratories have a good capability to irradiate personal dosimeters in the quantity Hp(10).


Assuntos
Monitoramento de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , Calibragem , Humanos , Laboratórios , América Latina , Dosímetros de Radiação
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 187(1): 1-7, 2019 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31034554

RESUMO

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is used to treat patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and with lower urinary obstructive tract symptoms. It is an interventional procedure which uses fluoroscopy equipment and can result in exposure to high doses of radiation in patients and staff. We aimed to demonstrate the reduction of radiation doses received by staff during PAE by implementing an optimised protocol called Radiation Exposure Curtailment for Embolisation (RECiFE). This protocol was implemented in cooperation with the medical team and technical team using Siemens Combined Applications to Reduce Exposure (CARE) protocol. The results showed approximately 83% reduction in the radiation doses received by the main physician during PAE. Thus, by adjusting the acquisition parameters of the angiographic equipment and implementing the RECiFE protocol, it is possible to optimise the PAE procedure and reduce the staff radiation dose.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Brasil , Humanos , Masculino
3.
J Radiol Prot ; 35(3): 629-47, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26270613

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to evaluate organ and tissue absorbed doses to patients undergoing hepatic chemoembolization procedures performed in two hospitals in the city of Recife, Brazil. Forty eight patients undergoing fifty hepatic chemoembolization procedures were investigated. For the 20 cases with PA projection only, organs and tissues dose to KAP conversion coefficients were calculated using the mesh-based anthropometric phantom series FASH and MASH coupled to the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. Clinical, dosimetric and irradiations parameters were registered for all patients. The maximum organ absorbed doses found were 2.4 Gy, 0.85 Gy, 0.76 Gy and 0.44 Gy for skin, kidneys, adrenals and liver, respectively.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Doses de Radiação , Radiografia Intervencionista , Glândulas Suprarrenais/efeitos da radiação , Adulto , Brasil , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/efeitos da radiação , Fígado/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Método de Monte Carlo , Imagens de Fantasmas , Pele/efeitos da radiação
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 165(1-4): 263-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25870436

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and medical staff absorbed doses received from transarterial chemoembolisation of hepatocellular carcinoma, which is the most common primary liver tumour worldwide. The study was performed in three hospitals in Recife, capital of the state of Pernambuco, located in the Brazilian Northeastern region. Two are public hospitals (A and B), and one is private (C). For each procedure, the number of images, irradiation parameters (kV, mA and fluoroscopy time), the air kerma-area product (PKA) and the cumulative air kerma (Ka,r) at the reference point were registered. The maximum skin dose (MSD) of the patient was estimated using radiochromic film. For the medical staff dosimetry, thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLD-100) were attached next to the eyes, close to the thyroid (above the shielding), on the thorax under the apron, on the wrist and on the feet. The effective dose to the staff was estimated using the algorithm of von Boetticher. The results showed that the mean value of the total PKA was 267.49, 403.83 and 479.74 Gy cm(2) for Hospitals A, B and C, respectively. With regard to the physicians, the average effective dose per procedure was 17 µSv, and the minimum and maximum values recorded were 1 and 41 µSy, respectively. The results showed that the feet received the highest doses followed by the hands and lens of the eye, since the physicians did not use leaded glasses and the equipment had no lead curtain.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Radiologia Intervencionista/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ar , Algoritmos , Brasil , Calibragem , Dosimetria Fotográfica/métodos , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Roupa de Proteção , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação , Radiometria , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Dosimetria Termoluminescente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...