Cross-Wavelet Time-Frequency Analysis Reveals Sympathetic Contribution to Baroreflex Sensitivity as Cause of Variable Phase Delay Between Blood Pressure and Heart Rate.

INTRODUCTION: Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is often presented as a single number, but it is actually a frequency-dependent phenomenon whose value changes constantly due to internal and external stimuli. The standing posture, for instance, necessitates a changeover from vagal to sympathetic predominance for cardiovascular control. We present a wavelet cross-spectral analysis of blood pressure (BP) and interbeat interval (IBI) recordings in the search for variations in gain and phase between these signals. Additionally, we show how the lag in sympathetic response dictates BP-to-IBI phase relations. METHODS: Recordings in supine and head-up tilted (HUT) position, obtained earlier in 10 healthy subjects (4f/6m, aged 27-47 years) were used. BP and IBI were measured from the continuous finger pressure (by Finometer). The cross-wavelet analysis produced time- and frequency dependent gain (wBRS, wavelet derived BRS) and phase, using the MATLAB® wavelet toolbox. We also applied the wBRS method to model-generated BP- and IBI-data with known interrelations to test the results of this analysis technique. Finally, wBRS values were compared with the xBRS-approach, which is a time domain method for continuous BRS estimation in a sliding 10-s window. RESULTS: In resting supine conditions, wBRS fluctuates; more at respiratory frequencies than in the 0.1 Hz band. After HUT, wBRS at the respiratory frequency decreases from average 22.7 to 8.5 ms/mmHg, phase between BP and IBI increases from -30° to -54°; in the sympathetic 0.1 Hz range these numbers are 13.3→6.3 ms/mmHg and -54°â†’-59°. The values found by xBRS are intermediate between wBRS-resp and wBRS-0.1 Hz. The Appendix shows that for the simulated data the BRS and phase values as found by the wavelet technique can be explained from vector additions of vagal and sympathetic BRS contributions. DISCUSSION: During supine rest parasympathetic control of heart rate dominates BRS; after HUT this is diminished and less effective. Due to the reaction times of the autonomic effectors, the phase relations between the signals depend on the relative contribution of the sympathetics, which explains the larger phase shift. CONCLUSION: Cross wavelet analysis allows to follow fast BRS changes in time and frequency, while the computed phase relations help understand sympathetic participation.

Reduction of rectal dose by integration of the boost in the large-field treatment plan for prostate irradiation.

PURPOSE: To reduce the dose in the rectal wall from prostate irradiation at high dose levels. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans in which the boost fields were integrated into the large fields (simultaneous integrated boost [SIB]) were compared with plans in which the large fields and boost fields were planned individually and applied in a sequential manner (sequential boost). Two target volumes were delineated: PTV1, the target volume of the large fields that is irradiated to 68 Gy, and PTV2, the target volume of the boost fields that is irradiated to 10 Gy. The sequential boost and the SIB were normalized to the mean dose in PTV2, being 78 Gy. We used a five-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique, applied in a step and shoot mode, and included beam weight optimization. A set of 5 patients with varying degree of overlap between PTV1 and the rectal wall was used for analysis. RESULTS: The SIB resulted in a reduction of the dose in the rectal wall. Rectal normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) decreased for the SIB, on average, by a factor of almost 2, compared with the sequential boost. CONCLUSION: The SIB reduced the dose in the rectal wall, compared with the sequential boost technique.