RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia is recognized as a common disorder in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and adverse effects of cisapride compared to a placebo in patients from a general practice with functional dyspepsia (FD). Secondly we investigated whether Helicobacter pylori-positive FD patients present with specific symptoms and determined the efficacy of cisapride for FD patients with H. pylori. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled double-blind study, patients were randomized to receive fixed doses of either cisapride (10 mg three times daily) or placebo. Symptoms were evaluated after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. The selection of FD patients,collection of data, and evaluation of symptoms as well as adverse effects were performed by general practitioners. Dyspeptic patients were referred to the Gastroenterology Department in order to exclude ulcers, oesophagitis, pancreatitis and gallstones. Biopsies of gastric mucosa were taken for histological examination and H. pylori culture. PATIENTS: 121 patients entered this study (61 took cisapride, 60 placebo). There were 113 patients (56 cisapride, 57 placebo) available for analysis of the efficacy and 120 patients (61 cisapride, 59 placebo) for evaluation of adverse effects.In total 102 biopsies were tested for the presence of gastritis by histological examination. There were 30 H. pylori-positive cultures among 111 patients. RESULTS: After 4 weeks a statistically significant reduction in symptoms was found, but it was similar in the two groups. No symptoms specific for H. pylori-positive patients were found. There was not a significant difference in the response to cisapride between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. The difference in overall (63%) response in the cisapride group and the 44% response in the placebo group did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was found between placebo and cisapride in the treatment of FD in general practice. H. pylori-positive patients did not present with specific symptoms nor did they exhibit a different response to cisapride.
Assuntos
Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Dispepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antiulcerosos/efeitos adversos , Cisaprida , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Método Duplo-Cego , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The successful use of iodine-131-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-131-MIBG) scintigraphy for diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma stimulated investigation into its diagnostic and therapeutic usefulness in other neural crest tumours. It appears that there is a difference in capacity to absorb I-131-MIBG between the different tumour types. In I-131-MIBG scintigraphy of carcinoids there are more false negative results in comparison with phaeochromocytomas and neuroblastomas. Melanoma, also a neural crest tumor, turned out to be false negative in 100% of the cases reported until 1989. The authors present a case of a malignant melanoma with metastases in liver and stomach, concentrating I-131-MIBG. Biochemical examination demonstrated that this particular tumour was metabolically very active. It is suggested that the I-131-MIBG-positive scintigram of the melanoma may be related to the level of metabolic activity. By biochemical screening in proven cases of malignant melanoma it may be possible to select cases in which I-131-MIBG scintigraphy is worthwhile with a view to therapeutic application of I-131-MIBG.