Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 19(10): 1069-1079, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31451419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of single-bed rooms for control of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae is under debate; the added value when applying contact precautions has not been shown. We aimed to assess whether an isolation strategy of contact precautions in a multiple-bed room was non-inferior to a strategy of contact precautions in a single-bed room for preventing transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. METHODS: We did a cluster-randomised, crossover, non-inferiority study on medical and surgical wards of 16 Dutch hospitals. During two consecutive study periods, either contact precautions in a single-bed room or contact precautions in a multiple-bed room were applied as the preferred isolation strategy for patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae cultured from a routine clinical sample (index patients). Eligible index patients were aged 18 years or older, had no strict indication for barrier precautions in a single-bed room, had a culture result reported within 7 days of culture and before discharge, and had no wardmate known to be colonised or infected with an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolate of the same bacterial species with a similar antibiogram. Hospitals were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by computer to one of two sequences of isolation strategies, stratified by university or non-university hospital. Allocation was masked for laboratory technicians who assessed the outcomes but not for patients, treating doctors, and infection-control practitioners enrolling index patients. The primary outcome was transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae to wardmates, which was defined as rectal carriage of an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolate that was clonally related to the index patient's isolate in at least one wardmate. The primary analysis was done in the per-protocol population, which included patients who were adherent to the assigned room type. A 10% non-inferiority margin for the risk difference was used to assess non-inferiority. This study is registered with Nederlands Trialregister, NTR2799. FINDINGS: 16 hospitals were randomised, eight to each sequence of isolation strategies. All hospitals randomised to the sequence single-bed room then multiple-bed room and five of eight hospitals randomised to the sequence multiple-bed room then single-bed room completed both study periods and were analysed. From April 24, 2011, to Feb 27, 2014, 1652 index patients and 12 875 wardmates were assessed for eligibility. Of those, 693 index patients and 9527 wardmates were enrolled and 463 index patients and 7093 wardmates were included in the per-protocol population. Transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae to at least one wardmate was identified for 11 (4%) of 275 index patients during the single-bed room strategy period and for 14 (7%) of 188 index patients during the multiple-bed room strategy period (crude risk difference 3·4%, 90% CI -0·3 to 7·1). INTERPRETATION: For patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae cultured from a routine clinical sample, an isolation strategy of contact precautions in a multiple-bed room was non-inferior to a strategy of contact precautions in a single-bed room for preventing transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Non-inferiority of the multiple-bed room strategy might change the current single-bed room preference for isolation of patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and, thus, broaden infection-control options for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in daily clinical practice. FUNDING: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/transmissão , Enterobacteriaceae/metabolismo , Hospitais Universitários , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Isolamento de Pacientes/métodos , Quartos de Pacientes , beta-Lactamases , Idoso , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Estudos Cross-Over , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Distribuição Aleatória
2.
PLoS One ; 7(10): e47707, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23082197

RESUMO

We determined the prevalence and spread of antibiotic resistance and the characteristics of ESBL producing and/or multi drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli isolates collected from urine samples from urology services in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine, the border region of the Netherlands (n=176), Belgium (n=126) and Germany (n=119). Significant differences in resistance between the three regions were observed. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid resistance ranged from 24% in the Netherlands to 39% in Belgium (p=0.018), from 20% to 40% (p<0.004) for the fluoroquinolones and from 20% to 40% (p=0.018) for the folate antagonists. Resistance to nitrofurantoin was less than 5%. The prevalence of ESBL producing isolates varied from 2% among the Dutch isolates to 8% among the German ones (p=0.012) and were mainly CTX-M 15. The prevalence of MDR isolates among the Dutch, German and Belgian isolates was 11%, 17% and 27%, respectively (p< =0.001 for the Belgian compared with the Dutch isolates). The majority of the MDR and ESBL producing isolates belonged to ST131. This study indicates that most antibiotics used as first choice oral empiric treatment for UTIs (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, fluoroquinolones and folate antagonists) are not appropriate for this purpose and that MDR strains such as CTX-M producing ST131 have spread in the entire Euregion. Our data stress the importance of ward specific surveillance to optimize empiric treatment. Also, prudent use of antibiotics and further research to alternative agents are warranted.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Manejo de Espécimes , Urologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Escherichia coli/classificação , Escherichia coli/enzimologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(10): 2418-24, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21719471

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Using data from an observational study in which the effectiveness of a guideline for eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage was evaluated, we identified variables that were associated with treatment failure. METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression model was performed with subgroup analyses for uncomplicated and complicated MRSA carriage (the latter including MRSA infection, skin lesions, foreign-body material, mupirocin resistance and/or exclusive extranasal carriage) and for those treated according to the guideline (i.e. mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine soap solution for uncomplicated carriage, in combination with two oral antibiotics for complicated carriage). RESULTS: Six hundred and thirteen MRSA carriers were included, of whom 333 (54%) had complicated carriage; 327 of 530 patients (62%) with known complexity of carriage were treated according to the guideline with an absolute increase in treatment success of 20% (95% confidence interval 12%-28%). Among those with uncomplicated carriage, guideline adherence [adjusted odds ratio (OR(a)) 7.4 (1.7-31.7)], chronic pulmonary disease [OR(a) 44 (2.9-668)], throat carriage [OR(a) 2.9 (1.4-6.1)], perineal carriage [OR(a) 2.2 (1.1-4.4)] and carriage among household contacts [OR(a) 5.6 (1.2-26)] were associated with treatment failure. Among those with complicated carriage, guideline adherence was associated with treatment success [OR(a) 0.2 (0.1-0.3)], whereas throat carriage [OR(a) 4.4 (2.3-8.3)] and dependence in activities of daily living [OR(a) 3.6 (1.4-8.9)] were associated with failure. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline adherence, especially among those with complicated MRSA carriage, was associated with treatment success. Adding patients with extranasal carriage or dependence in daily self-care activities to the definition of complicated carriage, and treating them likewise, may further increase treatment success.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Infecções Assintomáticas , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Resistência a Meticilina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Falha de Tratamento
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(10): 2409-17, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21719473

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in the Netherlands after the introduction of a guideline in 2006. The guideline distinguishes complicated (defined as the presence of MRSA infection, skin lesions, foreign-body material, mupirocin resistance and/or exclusive extranasal carriage) and uncomplicated carriage (not meeting criteria for complicated carriage). Mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine soap solution are recommended for uncomplicated carriers and the same treatment in combination with two oral antibiotics for complicated carriage. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in 18 Dutch centres from 1 October 2006 until 1 October 2008. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirteen MRSA carriers underwent one or more decolonization treatments during the study period, mostly after hospital discharge. Decolonization was achieved in 367 (60%) patients with one eradication attempt and ultimately 493 (80%) patients were decolonized, with a median time until decolonization of 10 days (interquartile range 7-43 days). Three hundred and twenty-seven (62%) carriers were treated according to the guideline, which was associated with an absolute increase in treatment success of 20% [from 45% (91/203) to 65% (214/327)]. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty percent of MRSA carriers were successfully decolonized after the first eradication attempt and 62% were treated according to the guideline, which was associated with an increased treatment success.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Assintomáticas , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Países Baixos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol ; 24(6): 337-41, 2002 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12508692

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the number of cells to be counted in cytocentrifuged bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid preparations in order to reach a reliable enumeration of each cell type. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 136 BAL fluid samples for patients with suspected pneumonia or interstitial lung disease were investigated. Differential cell counts were performed on May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuged preparations by 2 observers, each differentiating 500 cells. Reliability for the enumeration of each cell type was expressed as phi value, as calculated in generalizability theory. RESULTS: For polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and eosinophils, an acceptable phi value of > or = .95 was reached at a count of 300 cells by 1 observer. Mast cells reached a phi value of only .674 at a count of 500 cells by 1 observer, precluding a reliable count. At a count of 500 cells by 1 observer, squamous epithelial cells, bronchial epithelial cells and plasma cells displayed phi values of .868, .903 and .816, respectively. CONCLUSION: At a count of 300 cells, PMNs, alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and eosinophils are reliably enumerated in cytocentrifuged BAL fluid samples.


Assuntos
Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/citologia , Contagem de Leucócitos/métodos , Contagem de Células/métodos , Centrifugação , Eosinófilos/citologia , Células Epiteliais/citologia , Humanos , Linfócitos/citologia , Macrófagos Alveolares/citologia , Mastócitos/citologia , Neutrófilos/citologia , Plasmócitos/citologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...