Eight-month repellency and efficacy of an imidacloprid/flumethrin (Seresto® ) collar against the eastern paralysis tick (Ixodes holocyclus) on cats.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the repellency and efficacy of a 10% imidacloprid/4.5% flumethrin (Seresto® , Elanco) collar over an 8-month period against the eastern paralysis tick (Ixodes holocyclus) on cats. METHODS: Two non-blinded, open gender, randomised, placebo-controlled pen studies were conducted, with 26 cats enrolled in each study. Prior to inclusion, cats were immunised with I. holocyclus holocyclotoxin. Cats were treated on Day 0 with either an imidacloprid/flumethrin or placebo collar. Tick infestations with 20 unfed adult female eastern paralysis ticks commenced on Day 7, and were repeated monthly for 8 months. Repellency was determined by comparing the mean number of attached ticks on imidacloprid/flumethrin treated cats, to placebo collar treated cats at 6 and 24 h post infestation. Efficacy was determined by comparing the mean number of live ticks on imidacloprid/flumethrin collar treated cats to placebo collar treated cats at 72 h post infestation. RESULTS: Efficacy was 100% (P < 0.001) at 72 h, and repellency was greater than 96% (P < 0.001) at 24 h for every tick challenge in each of the two studies, from Day 7 to the final infestation at 8 months for imidacloprid/flumethrin collar treated cats. CONCLUSIONS: In two pen studies, an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar controlled and repelled the eastern paralysis tick (I. holocyclus) on cats for 8-months. The marked repellency effect in addition to controlling tick paralysis would be beneficial in preventing tick bites and their sequelae.

Treating grouped data as continuous in alcohol consumption measures.

In quantity-frequency methods used for self-report measurement of alcohol intake (or other exposures), respondents mark the appropriate ranges, e.g. '5 to 8 drinks', '5 or 6 times per week'. To calculate average consumption only single values, not ranges, can be multiplied, and midpoints are commonly used. This results in bias if the range lies in the tail of a distribution, as often happens with drinks per occasion. The same bias occurs when risk, for example, is plotted against consumption levels, which inevitable are grouped into ranges. Consequently, estimates of aggregate consumption can be exaggerated and curves of risk against exposure level can be misleading. A method is described to calculate a relatively unbiased representative value for a range, requiring only knowledge of the normal distribution table, the log-normal distribution, and basic arithmetic. Part of the procedure is also useful for estimating percentile points in data that have been grouped differently, such as income in dollar groups.

Insomnia in general practice. Results from NSW General Practice Survey 1991-1992.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an educational visit to GPs providing information about the non-drug and drug management of anxiety and insomnia can reduce subsequent rates of benzodiazepine prescription. METHOD: A randomised controlled trial of 286 NSW general practitioners conducted during 1991 and 1992. RESULTS: The educational visit was statistically significant in reducing the number of new prescriptions recorded by general practitioners for new diagnoses of insomnia. However, the majority of benzodiazepine prescriptions were for patients continuing treatment for insomnia or anxiety/depression. Overall, benzodiazepines were the sole management of insomnia recorded by the surveyed GPs in most cases (93.5%). In comparison, non-drug management for anxiety and depression was offered to more than a third of patients with anxiety and depression. (Benzodiazepines were the only management of anxiety and depression in just over 50% of cases.) DISCUSSION: This study shows general practitioners can change their management of insomnia and that change is most likely to occur when the problem is new, rather than old. The decreased emphasis on drug treatment in the general practice management of anxiety and depression may reflect the change in psychiatric teaching for these conditions. Further, most of the publicity about benzodiazepines has been in relation to their use for anxiety disorders. Doctors were interested in learning about advances in the understanding of sleep disorders and their non-drug management.

A controlled trial of educational visiting to improve benzodiazepine prescribing in general practice.

A randomised controlled trial studied the effect of an educational visit on benzodiazepine prescribing. An approximately representative sample of 286 general practitioners was allocated to an intervention or a control group. Rates of benzodiazepine prescriptions were derived from two comprehensive self-report surveys seven months apart. Two months after the first survey the intervention group received an educational visit and supporting material from a doctor or pharmacist, ostensibly unconnected with the surveys. The overall benzodiazepine prescribing rate fell by 23.7 per cent from the first to the second surveys, from 4.93 to 3.76 prescriptions per 100 encounters (P < 0.001). Anxiety and insomnia diagnosis rates also declined from 4.68 to 3.76 per 100 encounters (19.7 per cent). After adjusting for confounders, there was a differential downward trend in prescriptions per diagnosis of insomnia but not to a statistical level. The same was true of initial prescriptions per insomnia diagnosis. In a subsidiary analysis selecting only new insomnia diagnoses, the intervention had a strong effect in reducing initial prescriptions (odds ratio 0.18, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.04 to 0.73). No effect was seen on prescribing for anxiety diagnoses. Educational practice visiting for benzodiazepine prescribing in anxiety, as we conducted it, is not justified in an unselected population of general practitioners. Specific education on prescribing for insomnia is probably useful. Our interpretation of the reduction in benzodiazepine prescribing is that probably there was an effect from self-monitoring alone which overwhelmed a main-analysis intervention effect. Retrospective diagnosis may also have obscured a real intervention effect.

Benzodiazepine prescribing in general practice: dispelling some myths.

The objective was to analyse clinical and non-clinical factors associated with the receipt of a prescription for a benzodiazepine among general practice patients. A survey of 110 consecutive patient encounters (consultations) as recorded by a representative sample of general practitioners in inner urban, outer urban and rural settings was designed. A total of 286 general practitioners took part during 1991-2. 31,256 patients (10,683 male; 34%) were surveyed and the odds of receiving a benzodiazepine script measured. Insomnia, unlike anxiety, was almost routinely managed with a benzodiazepine alone (insomnia 89.6%; anxiety 49.4%), whereas anxiety was more likely to be managed with non-drug management (insomnia 7.2%; anxiety 38.3%). In multiple logistic regression, the variables significantly associated with the prescription of a benzodiazepine included being a female patient, being an older patient and being an established patient, who attends a GP working in a busy practice in an inner urban area. A second regression model was run with the addition of three variables, namely the presenting problems of anxiety and insomnia, and the number of health problems. The only predictors of benzodiazepine prescribing in the full model were these three clinical variables together with patient age. There is a need to educate doctors about the non-drug management of insomnia. The stereotype of the doctor over-prescribing a benzodiazepine without an appropriate problem/diagnosis should be questioned. On the other hand, there is concern that patient age continues to be associated with a prescription of these medications, when all other clinical and non-clinical factors are taken into account.

Educational visiting and hypnosedative prescribing in general practice.

Public concern about the prescription of hypnosedative drugs (mostly benzodiazepines) led to a controlled trial of an educational intervention to promote rational prescribing by general practitioners (GPs). This paper describes the educational intervention and its process evaluation. In urban and rural New South Wales 137 GPs were visited in office hours by a GP or pharmacist who had undergone communication skills training. Material offered to GPs included relaxation tapes and a booklet of problem-orientated management guidelines. The interview had three stages: rapport was established, then educational material was introduced and finally the visitor sought the doctor's agreement to review five patients on long-term benzodiazepines. The visits were well received. Several measures were composed to reflect doctors' motivation and interest in non-drug management; there was virtually no correlation between any of these process measures and the trial outcome: a change in prescribing behaviour. Self-rating of benzodiazepine prescribing greatly underestimated actual self-reported incidents of prescribing. We interpret this as a reminder that we do not always do what we mean to do, and that we do not always do what we think we do.

The epidemiology of leprosy in a high prevalence village in Papua New Guinea.

In a village of about 1000 people in Papua New Guinea the prevalence of clinical leprosy was 8.6% compared to about 3% in surrounding villages. This exceptionally high prevalence could not be explained by recent introduction of the disease or by social factors. Dapsone-resistant disease and faulty compliance with treatment are considered to be contributory to persistent infectivity of old cases which, together with the presence of 20 previously undiagnosed cases, comprised a large infective source. Social ostracism of cases was not observed and the extensive social mixing of all ages would facilitate widespread dissemination of infection. A high prevalence, particularly in children, of elevated levels of IgM antibody to phenolic glycolipid-1 Mycobacterium leprae specific antigen suggests frequent subclinical infection. The greater prevalence of clinical leprosy following childhood in the village favours altered susceptibility following exposure in childhood. There was a higher prevalence of leprosy in close relatives of cases when compared with the same relatives of age and sex matched leprosy-free controls. The occurrence of familial clustering of leprosy in a hyperendemic area with intense transmission suggests that unidentified inherited factors influence susceptibility to clinical leprosy. It is suggested that the clustering of adverse inherited traits through intermarriage may explain this hyperendemic focus on leprosy.