Impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life in female CrossFit practitioners: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on quality of life (QoL) in female CrossFit practitioners and to verify the strategies used by them to minimize the occurrence of urine leakage. In addition, to verify whether anthropometric and clinical characteristics increase the UI impact on QoL of female CrossFit practitioners. STUDY DESIGN: This was an online cross-sectional survey. The impact of UI on QoL was investigated by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Associations between the impact of UI on QoL and the clinical (age, BMI, gestations, mode of delivery, practice of other physical activities) and the others pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD) related independent variables were tested using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 828 female CrossFit practitioners answered the questionnaire and 36% reported UI symptoms. The women who obtained the highest score on the ICIQ-SF have high UI interference in QoL. Previous history of two or more gestations and sexual dysfunctions (dyspareunia or vaginismus) or pelvic organ prolapse increase 2.65 and 1.82 times the risk of female CrossFit practitioners with UI having a high impact of UI on their QoL, respectively (OR = 2.65 95% CI 1.30-5.40, p = 0.01; and OR = 1.82 95% CI 1.04-3.21, p = 0.04, respectively). The most strategies used by them to minimize the occurrence of urine leakage were emptying the bladder before training (77.5%) and use absorbent (17.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Women who had higher scores on the ICIQ-SF reported greater impact on QoL, and the previous history of two or more gestations and sexual dysfunction/pelvic organ prolapse increase the risk of women with UI who practice CrossFit to have a greater impact on QoL. Multigravida and women with sexual dysfunction/pelvic organ prolapse who practice CrossFit could have more attention on the UI symptoms due to the high impact on their QoL.

Accuracy of different handgrip values to identify mobility limitation in older adults.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Mobility limitation is commonly the first sign of impaired physical function and predisposes older adults to disability. Moreover, recent epidemiological studies have classified neuromuscular strength as the best explanator of mobility limitation. However, existing cutoffs have not been adequately analyzed regarding accuracy. Therefore, our aims were to define and compare the accuracy of different cutoff points of handgrip strength for the identification of mobility limitation. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 5783 participants from the SABE (Saúde, Bem-Estar e Envelhecimento [Health, Wellbeing and Aging]) and ELSA (English Longitudinal Study of Ageing) cohorts aged 60 years or older. Handgrip strength was measured using a dynamometer. Walking speed <0.8 m/s was considered mobility limitation. Receiver operating characteristic curves and probabilities of presenting mobility limitation were calculated. RESULTS: Handgrip strength <32 kg for men and <21 kg for women demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for mobility limitation, with 49.1% sensitivity and 79.8% specificity for men and 58.6% sensitivity and 72.9% specificity for women. The fully adjusted models had an area under the curve of 0.82 for men and 0.83 for women, with odds of presenting mobility limitation of 1.88 [95% CI: 1.50 - 2.37] for men and 1.89 [95% CI: 1.57 - 2.27] for women. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the accuracy of handgrip strength as a clinical marker of mobility limitation. Furthermore, manual dynamometry is easily incorporated into clinical practice, has a good cost-benefit, besides being a simple, valid, reliable and effective method for use in both the scientific community and outpatient practice.

Does Abdominal Obesity Accelerate Muscle Strength Decline in Older Adults? Evidence From the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional evidence has shown an association between abdominal obesity and lower muscle strength in older adults. However, no longitudinal findings have confirmed this association. In addition, the impact of abdominal fat on the reduction in muscle strength is not yet fully understood. METHODS: We investigated the longitudinal associations between abdominal obesity and handgrip strength in 5,181 older adults from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing over 8 years of follow-up. Muscular strength was measured using a manual dynamometer. Abdominal obesity was defined as a waist circumference >102 cm for men and >88 cm for women. Generalized linear mixed models were adjusted by measures of socioeconomic status, health conditions, lifestyle, cognition, depressive symptoms, biomarkers, and disability. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean age of participants was 65.8 years and their mean waist circumference and body mass index (BMI) were 95 cm and 27.7 kg/m2, respectively. Fully adjusted models showed that abdominal obese men and women had stronger muscle strength at baseline. The decline over time in muscle strength was accelerated in abdominal obese men (-0.12 kg/year, 95% confidence interval: -0.24 to -0.01) compared with nonabdominal obese. This association was not found in women. Comparative analyses showed that overweight men according to their BMI were not at greater risk of muscle strength decline. However, these men were at risk based on their waist circumference. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal obesity is associated with accelerated muscle strength decline in men.