Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Psychiatr Res ; 44(3): 132-6, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19656526

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Depression is a prospective risk factor for stroke. Little is known, however, about the pathophysiologic links leading to this association. Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) reflects the compensatory dilatory capacity of cerebral arterioles to a dilatory stimulus and is an important mechanism to provide constant cerebral blood flow. In the absence of major arterial stenosis, an impaired CVR has been associated with a higher risk of stroke. We hypothesized that CVR might be continuously reduced in patients with major depression even after successful remission thus contributing to the association between depression and stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated CVR in a group of patients (N=29) in the acute episode of depressive illness and after 21months under euthymic condition. A healthy control group (N=33) was investigated at comparable time intervals. All patients and controls were otherwise healthy. CVR was investigated by calculating the increase in cerebral blood flow velocity after stimulation with acetazolamide. Blood flow velocities were measured by transcranial doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: A group of acutely depressed patients presented a significantly reduced CVR compared to controls. On follow-up 21months later after treatment and remission, CVR in the patient group had significantly improved, whereas CVR in the control group remained unchanged. Confounding factors had no significant influence. DISCUSSION: CVR is impaired during major depression. Since CVR seems to improve after treatment of depression, the contribution to an increased stroke risk among depressive patients may be true for a subgroup only and needs to be further investigated.


Assuntos
Circulação Cerebrovascular/fisiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/fisiopatologia , Acetazolamida/farmacologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacologia , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo/efeitos dos fármacos , Circulação Cerebrovascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Neuropsychobiology ; 58(1): 11-8, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18781086

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Suppression of P50, N100 and P200 auditory evoked responses in a dual-click procedure is considered an index for the multistage sensory gating process. Whereas most studies use a protocol with long interstimulus intervals of 8-12 s between the stimuli pairs, there is also evidence that sensory gating occurs at much lower intervals. The aim of the study was to investigate whether a simple modified dual-click protocol with short interstimulus intervals elicts similar sensory gating ratios compared to the classic protocol. METHODS: P50, N100 and P200 amplitudes and sensory gating ratios were measured in 23 healthy subjects with 2 different dual-click protocols in 1 session: (1) a simple oddball modified with short interstimulus intervals of about 2.8 s (ISI2), and (2), the classic used with long intervals of about 8 s (ISI8). RESULTS: The amplitudes of the P50, N100 and P200 responses were mostly comparable and correlated between both protocols. Mean sensory gating ratios (ISI8/ISI2) were as follows: P50, 35.4/36.4%; N40P50, 36.1/39.9%; N100, 44.4/48.4%; P200, 46.8/43.3%; N100P200, 45.3/41.8%; all differences between protocols, p > 0.1. P50 ratio scores did not show a sufficient correlation between protocols [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) P50, 0.13; N40P50, 0.0] compared to N100 (ICC, 0.79), P200 (ICC, 0.6) and N100P200 (ICC, 0.61). CONCLUSION: Our results contradict the assumption that long interstimulus intervals of about 8 s are absolutely necessary to elicit a marked sensory gating phenomenon for P50, N100 and P200 auditory responses (at least when using a protocol with a simple attention task). However, because only healthy subjects were investigated, no prediction can be made for psychiatric patients, in whom neuronal processing may be different.


Assuntos
Estimulação Acústica/métodos , Vias Auditivas/fisiologia , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos/fisiologia , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia , Filtro Sensorial/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA