Leakage of stomal effluent outside the baseplate leads to rise in product usage and health professional interactions.

BACKGROUND: Leakage of stomal effluent outside the baseplate that soils clothes or bedsheets is a common problem for many people with a stoma and significantly impacts their quality of life. AIM: To understand behavioural changes for people experiencing faecal leakage outside the baseplate regarding the usage of pouching systems, supporting products and interactions with health professionals. METHODS: Retrospective, self-reported questionnaire. FINDINGS: Respondents on average experienced 1.1 incidents of faecal leakage outside the baseplate per fortnight. In periods with issues of leakage, 21% of respondents had been in contact with health professionals, 40% increased their use of pouching systems, 25% increased their use of existing supporting products, and 21% included additional supporting products to their change routine. The increased use of healthcare resources was estimated to cost £32.47 in the 3 weeks following a leakage incident. CONCLUSION: Incidents of leakage outside the baseplate lead to increased use of healthcare resources.

Utilities associated with stoma-related complications: peristomal skin complications and leakages.

AIM: Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) and leakages are major issues for people living with a stoma. The purpose of this study is to understand how these stoma-linked complications impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a UK population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used time trade-off (TTO) methodology to quantify health state utilities associated with two stoma-related complications: PSC and leakages. Respondents assessed 10 different health states with different PSC severity levels (no, mild, moderate or severe PSC) and frequencies of leakage events (2, 12 or 48 leakages onto clothes per year, and no leakage due to a digital solution). The average disutility value for each health state was also assessed. The study was conducted via a web-based survey in the UK adult general population. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The analysis included 758 respondents. Respondents considered living with a stoma with no PSC to be more favorable than the other health states. Severe pain, itching and/or burning (PIB) was associated with the largest disutility compared to no PSC. The disutility (0-1 scale) compared to no PSC was 0.287 (p < .0001), 0.106 (p < .0001) and 0.025 (p=.0005) for PIB scores of 8, 5 and 2, respectively, on a 1-10 scale. More frequent leakage events were associated with lower utility. The utility decreases compared to no PSC were 0.114 (p < .0001), 0.057 (p < .0001) and 0.022 (p < .0001) for 48, 12 and 2 leakage events per year, respectively. The health state with a digital notification solution that notifies the user before a leakage event happens was considered as good as no PSC. CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing mild, moderate, and severe levels of PSC or leakage onto clothes is associated with a significant reduction in HRQoL compared to no PSC and/or no leakage. Stoma appliances that reduce the skin complications or keep leakage from reaching the clothes are likely to improve HRQoL.