Development of a wheelchair mobility skills test for children and adolescents: combining evidence with clinical expertise.

BACKGROUND: Wheelchair mobility skills (WMS) training is regarded by children using a manual wheelchair and their parents as an important factor to improve participation and daily physical activity. Currently, there is no outcome measure available for the evaluation of WMS in children. Several wheelchair mobility outcome measures have been developed for adults, but none of these have been validated in children. Therefore the objective of this study is to develop a WMS outcome measure for children using the current knowledge from literature in combination with the clinical expertise of health care professionals, children and their parents. METHODS: Mixed methods approach. Phase 1: Item identification of WMS items through a systematic review using the 'COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments' (COSMIN) recommendations. Phase 2: Item selection and validation of relevant WMS items for children, using a focus group and interviews with children using a manual wheelchair, their parents and health care professionals. Phase 3: Feasibility of the newly developed Utrecht Pediatric Wheelchair Mobility Skills Test (UP-WMST) through pilot testing. RESULTS: Phase 1: Data analysis and synthesis of nine WMS related outcome measures showed there is no widely used outcome measure with levels of evidence across all measurement properties. However, four outcome measures showed some levels of evidence on reliability and validity for adults. Twenty-two WMS items with the best clinimetric properties were selected for further analysis in phase 2. Phase 2: Fifteen items were deemed as relevant for children, one item needed adaptation and six items were considered not relevant for assessing WMS in children. Phase 3: Two health care professionals administered the UP-WMST in eight children. The instructions of the UP-WMST were clear, but the scoring method of the height difference items needed adaptation. The outdoor items for rolling over soft surface and the side slope item were excluded in the final version of the UP-WMST due to logistic reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed 15 item UP-WMST is a validated outcome measure which is easy to administer in children using a manual wheelchair. More research regarding reliability, construct validity and responsiveness is warranted before the UP-WMST can be used in practice.

Reproducibility of maximal and submaximal exercise testing in "normal ambulatory" and "community ambulatory" children and adolescents with spina bifida: which is best for the evaluation and application of exercise training?

BACKGROUND: With emerging interest in exercise and lifestyle interventions for children and adolescents with spina bifida, there is a need for appropriate measurements in exercise testing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess both reliability and agreement of maximal and submaximal exercise measures in "normal ambulatory" and "community ambulatory" children and adolescents with spina bifida. DESIGN: This was a reproducibility study. METHODS: Twenty-three children and adolescents with spina bifida (10 normal ambulatory and 13 community ambulatory) participated in the study. Maximal exercise outcomes were measured using a graded treadmill test. Peak measures (peak oxygen uptake [V(O2)peak], peak heart rate [HRpeak], heart rate response [HRR], and oxygen pulse) were recorded. For submaximal measures, heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (V(O2)) at the ventilatory threshold and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) were derived from the maximal measures. Functional performance was measured as the 6-minute walking distance and the maximal speed during the treadmill test. After checking for normality and heteroscedasticity, paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and the smallest detectable difference (SDD) or the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. RESULTS: Performance measures showed good reliability and agreement. For maximal measures, acceptable ICCs were found for all measures. For submaximal measures, only HR at the ventilatory threshold showed an ICC of less than .80. Agreement showed a CV of less than 10% for all measures, except for V(O2) at the ventilatory threshold, HRR, and OUES. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the study include missing data due to equipment failure. Furthermore, the outcomes were limited to normal ambulatory and community ambulatory children and adolescents with spina bifida. CONCLUSIONS: Both maximal and submaximal measures of exercise testing can be used for discriminative purposes in ambulatory children and adolescents with spina bifida. For evaluative purposes, HR measures are superior to V(O2) measures, while taking into account the individual variation of 5% to 8%. The SDD was 0.5 km/h for peak speed and 36.3 m for 6-minute walking distance. Heart rate response, oxygen pulse, and OUES are not recommended in the evaluation of exercise testing in this population.

Treadmill testing of children who have spina bifida and are ambulatory: does peak oxygen uptake reflect maximum oxygen uptake?

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have demonstrated low peak oxygen uptake ((.)Vo(2)peak) in children with spina bifida. Low peak heart rate and low peak respiratory exchange ratio in these studies raised questions regarding the true maximal character of (.)Vo(2)peak values obtained with treadmill testing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the Vo(2)peak measured during an incremental treadmill test is a true reflection of the maximum oxygen uptake ((.)Vo(2)max) in children who have spina bifida and are ambulatory. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was used for this study. METHODS: Twenty children who had spina bifida and were ambulatory participated. The (.)Vo(2)peak was measured during a graded treadmill exercise test. The validity of (.)Vo(2)peak measurements was evaluated by use of previously described guidelines for maximum exercise testing in children who are healthy, as well as differences between Vo(2)peak and (.)Vo(2) during a supramaximal protocol ((.)Vo(2)supramaximal). RESULTS: The average values for (.)Vo(2)peak and normalized (.)Vo(2)peak were, respectively, 1.23 L/min (SD=0.6) and 34.1 mL/kg/min (SD=8.3). Fifteen children met at least 2 of the 3 previously described criteria; one child failed to meet any criteria. Although there were no significant differences between (.)Vo(2)peak and Vo(2)supramaximal, 5 children did show improvement during supramaximal testing. LIMITATIONS: These results apply to children who have spina bifida and are at least community ambulatory. CONCLUSIONS: The (.)Vo(2)peak measured during an incremental treadmill test seems to reflect the true (.)Vo(2)max in children who have spina bifida and are ambulatory, validating the use of a treadmill test for these children. When confirmation of maximal effort is needed, the addition of supramaximal testing of children with disability is an easy and well-tolerated method.