Cost-utility analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus optimal medical therapy in managing supraventricular tachycardia among Filipinos.

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the standard of care in the management of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Its cost-effectiveness in an emerging Asian country has not been studied. Objectives: A cost-utility analysis of RFA versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) among Filipinos with SVT was conducted using the public healthcare provider's perspective. Methods: A simulation cohort using a lifetime Markov model was constructed using patient interviews, a review of literature, and expert consensus. Three basic health states were defined: stable, SVT recurrence, and death. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (ICER) was determined for both arms. Utilities for the entry states were derived from patient interviews using the EQ5D-5L tool; utilities for other health states were taken from publications. Costs were assessed from the healthcare payer perspective. A sensitivity analysis was done. Results: Base case analysis showed that RFA versus OMT is both highly cost-effective at 5 years and over a lifetime. RFA at 5 years costs about PhP276,913.58 (USD5,446) versus OMT of PhP151,550.95 (USD2,981) per patient. Discounted lifetime costs were PhP280,770.32 (USD5,522) for RFA, versus PhP259,549.74 (USD5,105) for OMT. There was improved quality of life with RFA (8.1 vs. 5.7 QALYs per patient). The 5-year and lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were PhP148,741.40 (USD2,926) and Php15,000 (USD295), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed 56.7% of simulations for RFA fell below a GDP-benchmarked willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Conclusion: Despite the initial higher cost, RFA versus OMT for SVT is highly cost-effective from the Philippine public health payer's perspective.

Economic Evaluation of Selected Interleukin Inhibitors Versus Methotrexate for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis From the Philippine Payer Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted an economic evaluation of interleukin inhibitors (ILIs) guselkumab, ixekizumab (IXE), secukinumab (SEC), and ustekinumab to a methotrexate (MTX) comparator for biologic-naive adult Filipino patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A 1-year decision tree and 5-year Markov model were used to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in Philippine pesos (PHP) per Psoriasis Area Severity Index improvement of at least 75%. For health technology assessment purposes, we also estimated the budget impact of subsidies for SEC to a Government of the Philippines (GoP) payer. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Data sources included global literature and local intervention prices. RESULTS: All ILIs were more effective but also more expensive than MTX. In the base case, only IXE and SEC were cost-effective treatments at a gross domestic product-benchmarked threshold, yielding ICERs of PHP468 098.01 and PHP483 525.32 per PASI responder, respectively. GUS and UST were less likely to be cost-effective throughout a range of simulated thresholds. ICERs were most responsive to discontinuation rates and drug prices. Full subsidy of SEC for 5 years would cost the GoP PHP1.83 billion more than a similar subsidy for MTX. CONCLUSIONS: ILIs were clearly more effective than MTX, but only IXE and SEC were potentially cost-effective for a GoP payer. Any case in which SEC is fully subsidized is more expensive to the GoP than the base case. This study was limited by a lack of country-specific effectiveness data, underestimation of comparator costs, exclusion of noncutaneous and quality-of-life effects, and indirect costs.