Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.

Femoral cement-in-cement revisions are attractive if the cement bone mantle is well fixed. However, most available cemented stems are too long to fit in the existing cement mantle. We evaluated the medium-term outcomes of the 125 mm short tapered polished stem (Exeter Short Revision Stem (SRS)) with a 44 mm offset specifically designed to facilitate cement-in-cement revisions of hip arthroplasties. The Exeter SRS was clinically and radiographically evaluated in 24 consecutive femoral cement-in-cement revisions (11 men, 13 women) between July 2005 and February 2008 after a mean follow-up of six years (5-7). The mean age at operation was 67 years (54-83). No hip was lost to follow-up, but two patients (two hips) died. None of the deaths were related to the surgery. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. Four femoral components (17%) were removed for septic loosening after a mean of 2.4 years (0.8-4.9). Three of these hips were revised again in a two-stage revision, and one was converted to a permanent excision arthroplasty. The probability of survival with re-revision for any reason was 82% (95% CI: 58-93) and survivorship with aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100% at six years. There were no additional radiological failures. The Exeter Short Revision Stem is a valuable option for simplifying cement-in-cement revisions. Despite the short stem length, at mid-term there were no signs of instability or aseptic loosening.

Total hip arthroplasties in young patients under 50 years: limited evidence for current trends. A descriptive literature review.

We examined all reported outcomes of uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age listed in Medline (1966- 1 January 2009) and PubMed, and scrutinised reference lists of relevant papers. In addition, we evaluated relevant data in the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. 109 relevant articles were identified, 37 of which had a mean follow-up longer than 10 years. Although uncemented implants are widely used in patients under 50 years of age, there are only 2 reports that fulfil the criteria published by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom (follow-up of >10 yrs and survival of =90%). Current trends relating to implant selection remain unsupported by survival data, and additional information about the long-term results of newer implants is essential. As matters stand, the most reliable results relate to cemented implants.

Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.

BACKGROUND: Loosening of acetabular components often leads to bony defects. Management of extensive acetabular bone loss in hip revision arthroplasty can be a tremendous challenge. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether a reconstruction with impacted bone grafts will provide a durable and pain-free function in extensive acetabular defects. We specifically determined the (1) survival rates with the end point of revision for any reason, aseptic revision, and radiographic loosening; (2) visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Harris hip score (HHS), and the Oxford Hip Questionnaire score (OHQS); (3) number of repeat revisions; (4) complications; and (5) radiographic loosening, wear, and radiolucencies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively followed 25 patients (27 hips) with extensive acetabular defects. No patient was lost to followup. Two patients died during followup. Minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 8.8 years; range, 3-14.1 years). RESULTS: Three patients (three hips) underwent repeat revision surgery and another two patients (two hips) had radiographically loose hips. The 10-year survival rate was 88% (95% confidence interval, 74.2%-100%) with the end point acetabular revision for any reason and 95% (95% confidence interval, 86.0%-100%) with the end point acetabular revision for aseptic loosening. The mean HHSs were 55 points before surgery and 72 points postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup is a reliable technique with a 10-year survival rate of 88% in patients with extensive acetabular deficiencies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting]. / Totaleheupprothesen bij patiënten jonger dan 40 jaar en reconstructie van botdefecten met botsnippers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term results of primary cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of 40. In cases of acetabular defects, initial reconstruction with bone impaction grafting was performed. DESIGN: Cohort analysis. METHODS: Details of patients under the age of 40 who underwent primary cemented total hip arthroplasty between 1 January 1988 and 30 June 2004 were analysed. The primary goal of this study was to determine the time until revision surgery. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to calculate prosthesis survival. RESULTS: A total of 175 total hip arthroplasties in 130 patients were included in the study. Acetabular reconstruction using bone impaction grafting was performed on 84 hips (48%). The average age at surgery was 31 years. Six patients (8 hips) died during follow-up; none of these had undergone revision surgery. Average follow-up was 8.1 years (range: 2.0-18.5). In total, 24 hips (14%) were revised. Reasons for revision were: septic loosening (n = 8), recurrent dislocations (n = 4), traumatic loosening (n = 1) and aseptic loosening (n = 11). The 10-year prosthesis survival was 83% (95% CI: 76-90) with the endpoint 'revision for any reason' and 92% (95% CI: 86-98) with the endpoint 'revision for aseptic loosening'. Aseptic survival of the cups with and without bone impaction grafting was 95% (95% CI: 89-100) and 90% (95% CI: 81-99) (p = 0.73), respectively. CONCLUSION: Hip replacement with cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of 40 produced good long-term results. Acetabular deficiencies reconstructed with bone impaction grafting also produced good results in this group of patients.

Good results with cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients between 40 and 50 years of age.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasties in young patients have lower long-term survival rates than in older patients. We evaluated the use of a unique treatment protocol in patients aged between 40 and 50 years. In all cases we used a cemented THA, and for acetabular deficiencies we also used impacted bone grafts together with a cemented cup. METHODS: In 140 consecutive patients who were between 40 and 50 years of age at index surgery, 168 cemented total hip prostheses were evaluated after a mean follow-up time of 10 (2-19) years. Acetabular deficiencies were reconstructed with wire meshes and impacted bone grafts with a cemented cup (70 hips). During follow-up, 18 patients died (27 hips); in this group 3 hips (3 patients) had been revised. None of the patients were lost to follow-up. In all surviving patients, clinical assessment was performed with hip-score questions and all radiographs were evaluated. RESULTS: All clinical questionnaires showed an improved clinical hip score. 29 hips (17%) were revised after a mean of 8 (0.3-18) years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a survival of 88% (95% CI: 82-94) after 10 years with revision of either component for any reason. Survival with endpoint revision for aseptic loosening of either component was 94% (95% CI: 90-99) after 10 years. INTERPRETATION: Cemented implants in young patients have satisfying long-term results. Reconstruction of acetabular deficiencies with impacted bone grafts show promising results.

Cemented polyethylene cups in patients younger than 40 years.

UNLABELLED: Although uncemented cup implants frequently are used in young patients, we believe long-term survival rates of cups in these patients are somewhat disappointing, and therefore we have continued to use cemented cups in primary THA, even in young patients. However, in cases of acetabular bone stock defects, we also use bone impaction grafting. We prospectively followed 130 patients with 175 cemented cups; no patients were lost to followup. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 31 years (range, 16-39 years). An acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting was performed in 84 hips (48%). The minimum followup was 2 years (average, 8.1 years; range, 2.0-18.5 years). Twenty-one of the 175 cups (12%) were revised at an average of 8.1 years (range, 2.0-18.5 years). Reasons for revision were infection (one early, seven late), recurrent dislocations (two), traumatic loosening (one), and aseptic loosening (10). The 10-year survival rate of all cemented cups with end point of revision for any cause was 85%. Survival with end point of aseptic loosening of all cups was 92%. Survival with end point of revision for aseptic loosening was 90% for the cups without impaction grafting and 95% for the cups with impaction grafting. We believe cemented acetabular cups in young patients have acceptable midterm survival; however, in the case of acetabular bone defects, we recommend reconstruction with impaction grafting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.