RESUMO
Introduction: Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (pUEDVT) range from conservative treatment with anticoagulation therapy to invasive treatment with thoracic outlet decompression surgery (TOD), frequently combined with catheter directed thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, or stenting. Due to a lack of large prospective series with uniform data collection or a randomized trial, the optimal treatment strategy is still under debate. We conducted a multicenter observational study to assess the efficacy and safety of both the conservative and invasive treatment strategies for patients with pUEDVT. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in five vascular referral and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2019. Patients were divided into a conservative (Group 1), an invasive treatment group (Group 2) and a cross-over group (Group 3) of patients who received surgical treatment after initial conservative therapy. Follow-up consisted of outpatient clinic visits and an electronic survey. Primary outcome was symptom free survival defined as absence of any symptom of the affected arm reported at last follow-up regardless of severity, or extent of functional disability. Secondary outcomes were incidence of bleeding complications, recurrent venous thromboembolism, surgical complications, and reinterventions. Results: A total of 115 patients were included (group 1 (N = 45), group 2 (N = 53) or group 3 (N = 27). The symptom free survival was 35.6%, 54.7% and 48.1% after a median follow-up of 36, 26 and 22 months in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Incidence of bleeding complications was 8.6%, 3.8% and 18.5% and recurrent thrombosis occurred in 15.6%, 13.2% and 14.8% in groups 1-3 respectively. Conclusion: In this multicenter retrospective observational cohort analysis the conservative and direct invasive treatments for pUEDVT were deemed safe with low percentages of bleeding complications. Symptom free survival was highest in the direct surgical treatment group but still modest in all subgroups. Perioperative complications were infrequent with no related long term morbidity. Of relevance, pUEDVT patients with confirmed VTOS and recurrent symptoms after conservative treatment may still benefit from TOD surgery. However, symptom free survival of this delayed TOD seems lower than direct surgical treatment and bleeding complications seem to occur more frequently.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Incisional hernias after laparotomy are associated with significant morbidity and increased costs. Recent research on prevention of incisional hernia formation suggests that a laparotomy closure technique using a slowly absorbable monofilament suture with small fascial steps and bites in a continuous, single layer with a suture length to wound length (SL/WL) ratio of at least 4:1 is effective in lowering morbidity. Little is known about application of this evidence in daily practice. Therefore, a survey was performed among Dutch surgeons. METHODS: All members of the Dutch Surgical Society were invited to participate in a 24-question online survey on techniques and materials used for abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy. Subgroup analysis was performed based on surgical subspecialty, type of hospital and experience. RESULTS: Response rate was 26% (402 respondents), representing 97% of all Dutch surgical departments. More than 90% of participants closed the abdominal wall in a single mass layer, using a slowly absorbable monofilament running suture The SL/WL ratio of >4:1 is practiced by only 35% of participants and preferred suture size was variable among participants. Risk factors for incisional hernia development were generally identified correctly but more than half of the participants were unaware of the incidence and time of occurrence of incisional hernia. Subgroup analysis found that gastrointestinal and oncologic surgeons preferred smaller diameter sutures and higher suture-length to wound-length ratios. Trauma, vascular and pediatric surgeons had lower estimates of incidence of incisional hernia than other subspecialties. Surgeons employed in academic hospitals were more likely to use small fascial steps and smaller suture sizes than their colleagues in non-academic hospitals. Correct estimates of incisional hernia incidence decreased when surgeons perform less than 10 laparotomies annually. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the latest evidence regarding closure techniques of the abdominal wall is not widespread. Only 35% of surgeons close the abdominal fascia using a suture length to wound length ratio of 4:1, which is recommended based on the latest evidence. Surgical trainees, gastrointestinal and oncological surgeons are most familiar with the recommended technique and use it in their daily practice. Efforts should be directed at improving spreading of this technique.
