RESUMO
ABSTRACT Purpose To describe the audiological characteristics and the type of intervention chosen on unilateral hearing loss cases in children and adolescents as well as to analyze correlations between the degree of hearing loss, the indication and the use of electronic devices. Methods Observational, descriptive and retrospective study, carried out with information of 34 medical records from children and adolescents with unilateral hearing loss, assessed by two auditory rehabilitation services of medium complexity, throughout 2016 to 2019. Descriptive and Inferential statistical analysis were performed with the data. Results A predominance of profound sensorineural unilateral hearing loss in the right ear, of pre-lingual character, with 20.6% of malformations. The most adopted intervention was the hearing aid indication, although its use is low, regardless of the degree of the hearing loss. An association was found between the degree of the hearing loss and the healthcare professionals in indicating the use of the devices. Conclusion The indication of hearing aids is the most frequent and this decision is influenced by the degree of the hearing loss, in which the devices are mostly indicated for mild to severe losses, with bigger divergence of conduct for profound hearing losses.
RESUMO Objetivo Descrever as características audiológicas e o tipo de intervenção tomada em casos de perda auditiva unilateral em crianças e adolescentes e analisar correlações entre o grau da deficiência auditiva, a indicação e o uso de auxiliares de audição. Método Estudo observacional, descritivo e retrospectivo, realizado com informações dos prontuários de 34 crianças e adolescentes com perda auditiva unilateral, atendidos em dois serviços de reabilitação auditiva de média complexidade, no período de 2016 a 2019. Realizou-se a análise estatística descritiva e inferencial dos dados. Resultados Predomínio de perda auditiva unilateral do tipo neurossensorial, de grau profundo à direita, pré-lingual com 20,6% de malformações. A intervenção mais adotada foi a indicação de prótese auditiva, porém o uso é baixo, independente do grau da perda. Houve associação entre o grau da perda auditiva e a decisão dos profissionais em indicar o uso dos dispositivos. Conclusão A indicação de próteses auditivas é a mais frequente e esta decisão é influenciada pelo grau da perda auditiva, sendo os aparelhos auditivos indicados para as perdas leves a severas, com uma maior divergência de condutas para as perdas profundas.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the audiological characteristics and the type of intervention chosen on unilateral hearing loss cases in children and adolescents as well as to analyze correlations between the degree of hearing loss, the indication and the use of electronic devices. METHODS: Observational, descriptive and retrospective study, carried out with information of 34 medical records from children and adolescents with unilateral hearing loss, assessed by two auditory rehabilitation services of medium complexity, throughout 2016 to 2019. Descriptive and Inferential statistical analysis were performed with the data. RESULTS: A predominance of profound sensorineural unilateral hearing loss in the right ear, of pre-lingual character, with 20.6% of malformations. The most adopted intervention was the hearing aid indication, although its use is low, regardless of the degree of the hearing loss. An association was found between the degree of the hearing loss and the healthcare professionals in indicating the use of the devices. CONCLUSION: The indication of hearing aids is the most frequent and this decision is influenced by the degree of the hearing loss, in which the devices are mostly indicated for mild to severe losses, with bigger divergence of conduct for profound hearing losses.
