Characterization of RHD alleles present in serologically RHD-negative donors determined by a sensitive microplate technique.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Weak D phenotypes with very low antigen densities and DEL phenotype may not be detected in RhD typing routine and could be typed as D-negative, leading to D alloimmunization of D-negative recipients. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of RHD-positive genotypes in blood donors typed as D-negative by an automated system using the solid-phase methodology as a confirmatory test. METHODS: Two screenings were performed in different selected donor populations. For the first screening, we selected 1403 blood donor samples typed as D-negative regardless of the CE status, and in the second screening, we selected 517 donor samples typed as D-negative C+ and/or E+. RhD typing was performed by microplate in an automated equipment (Neo-Immucor®), and the confirmatory test was performed by solid-phase technique using Capture R® technology. A multiplex PCR specific to RHD and RHDψ was performed in a pool of 6 DNA samples. Sequencing of RHD exons was performed in all RHD-positive samples, and a specific PCR was used to identify the D-CE(4-7)-D hybrid gene. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: No weak D type was found in either screening populations. Additionally, 353 (18·4%) D-negative samples presented previously reported non-functional RHD genes, 2 samples had a DEL allele, and 6 samples demonstrated new alleles, including one novel DEL allele. Our study identified six new RHD alleles and showed that the inclusion of a confirmatory test using serological methodology with high sensitivity can reduce the frequency of weak D samples typed as D-negative.

SMIM1 polymorphisms in a donor population from southeast Brazil and their correlation with VEL expression.

BACKGROUND: Vel is a high frequency blood group antigen and its alloantibody is involved in haemolytic transfusion reactions. After elucidation of the molecular basis of the Vel-negative phenotype defined by a 17-base pair deletion in SMIM1, genotyping has been the technique of choice to identify the Vel-negative phenotype, and molecular investigations have contributed to explain Vel expression variability. The present study was aimed at screening for Vel negative blood donors and characterising the genetic changes found in Brazilian donors with altered Vel expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Molecular screening for the SMIM1*64_80del allele was performed in 1,595 blood donor samples using a SNaPshot protocol previously standardised in our laboratory. Four hundred donor samples were also submitted to serological screening using a polyclonal anti-Vel from our inventory. Samples with variability in antigen strength were selected for SMIM1 sequencing. RESULTS: No homozygous SMIM1*64_80del allele was found and the SMIM1*64_80del allele frequency was 1.01%. Different patterns of reactivity were observed in serological testing varying from negative to 3+. Through sequencing analysis we highlighted two polymorphisms: rs1175550 and rs6673829. The minor G allele of rs1175550 was found in 16/20 samples reacting 3+, while the major A allele was found in 21/23 samples reacting 2+. Regarding rs6673829, the minor A allele was present in 14/23 and 3/20 samples reacting 2+ and 3+ respectively. DISCUSSION: We included molecular VEL screening in a previously standardised SNaPshot protocol, which besides enabling detection of Vel-negative donors, also searches for eight other rare blood types. Additionally, the present study demonstrated that although the SMIM1*64_80del allele is responsible for some variation of Vel phenotype in this donor population, Vel expression is also controlled by molecular changes in SMIM1 intron 2.

Frequency of Wr(a) antigen and anti-Wr(a) in Brazilian blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Wr(a) is a low-incidence antigen, which is antithetical to the high prevalence red blood cell antigen, Wr(b). Anti-Wr(a) is a naturally occurring antibody that is found in approximately 1-2% of blood donors. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of Wr(a) and anti-Wr(a) in Brazilian blood donors. METHODS: A total of 1662 Brazilian blood donors were molecularly analyzed using the SNaPshot methodology to determine the WR*A/B alleles and to predict the frequency of the Wr(a) antigen. To detect the anti-Wr(a), samples from 1049 blood donors were analyzed using a gel test with Wr(a+) red blood cells. The serum was treated with dithiothreitol (DTT) to determine the immunoglobulin classes. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-G isotype classification was performed in a gel test using the IgG1/IgG3 card. A monocyte monolayer assay was employed to predict the clinical significance of IgG anti-Wr(a). RESULTS: Of the 1662 donors, only one sample had the DI*02.03 allele in heterozygous predicting the Wr(a+b+) phenotype. Anti-Wr(a) was detected in 34 (3.24%) samples, 64.7% in females and 35.3% in males. Regarding the immunoglobulin class, eight (23.5%) cases of anti-Wr(a) were classified as IgG and 26 (76.5%) as IgM. Of the eight cases of IgG anti-Wr(a), four were IgG1, two were IgG3 and three anti-Wr(a) were not IgG3 or IgG1, and thus probably IgG2 or IgG4. The results of the monocyte monolayer assay showed that IgG anti-Wr(a) might be of clinical significance. CONCLUSION: This study shows a very low frequency (0.06%) of the Wr(a) antigen in Brazilian blood donors. Additionally, it shows that the frequency of anti-Wr(a) in this population is higher than previously reported.

A new strategy to identify rare blood donors: single polymerase chain reaction multiplex SNaPshot reaction for detection of 16 blood group alleles.

BACKGROUND: As an alternative to phenotyping, large-scale DNA-based assays, which are feasible for high-throughput donor red blood cell typing, were developed for determination of blood group polymorphisms. However, high-throughput genotyping platforms based on these technologies are still expensive and the inclusion of single nucleotide polymorphisms and analysis of the alleles depend on the manufacturer's determination. To overcome this limitation and in order to develop an assay to enable the screening of rare donors, we developed a SNaPshot assay for analysis of nine single nucleotide polymorphisms related to antigens that are difficult to assess using conventional serology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single polymerase chain reaction multiplex SNaPshot reaction was optimized to identify nine single nucleotide polymorphisms determining 16 alleles: KEL*3/KEL*4, KEL*6/KEL*7, DI*1/DI*2, DI*3/DI*4, YT*1/YT*2, CO*1/CO*2, DO*1/DO*2, DO*4, DO*5. We designed a single multiplex PCR with primers encompassing the blood group single nucleotide polymorphisms and performed an internal reaction with probe primers able to discriminate the alleles after fragment analysis. The SNaPshot assay was validated with 140 known alleles previously determined by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: We were able to simultaneous detect nine single nucleotide polymorphisms defining 16 blood group alleles on an assay based on a multiplex PCR combined with a single base extension using genomic DNA. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates a robust genotyping strategy for conducting rare donor screening which can be applied in blood centers and could be an important tool for identifying antigen-negative donors and, therefore, for providing rare blood.