RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser with or without the 5% fluoride varnish on the acid resistance of dentin after erosive challenge. METHODS: 36 incisors were selected and sectioned, obtaining 72 specimens of 4 mm × 4 mm and randomly divided into eight groups (n = 9). In G1: application of Er,Cr:YSGG (0.1W; 5Hz, air 55%); G2: laser (0.25W; 5Hz, air 55%); G3: fluoride varnish + laser (0.1W; 5Hz, air 55%); G4: fluoride varnish + laser (0.25W, 5Hz, air 55%); G5: fluoride varnish + laser (0.1W; 5Hz, without air); G6: fluoride varnish + laser (0.25W, 5Hz, without air); G7: fluoride varnish and G8: no treatment. When used, the laser was irradiated without water cooling, scanning mode during 10 seconds. The surface roughness data were subjected to ANOVA. For wear profile, we used Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn post-hoc, all with α= 0.05. RESULTS: The results showed no statistically significant difference when comparing the groups as regards to the surface roughness (P> 0.05). Regarding the percentage of lost volume, the G5 and G6 groups presented the best results (G5 = 7.8% and G6 = 8.5%), with the lowest loss of dentin volume compared to other groups (P< 0.05). The G8 group (no treatment) had the highest lost volume (G8 = 39.1% followed by the G7 group (fluoride varnish), which had 25.9%. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and fluoride varnish can be an effective method to increase the acid resistance of dentin after erosive challenges, and limit problems related to hypersensitivity.
