Implementing new surgical technology: a national perspective on case volume requirement for proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision

Background: Early data suggest that transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a safe alternative to the abdominal approach for rectal cancer. This study aims to understand the approach to the management of rectal cancer in Canada and to ascertain perspectives on introducing TaTME. Methods: Surgeons were invited to complete a survey that asked about their management practices relating to rectal cancer and their opinions regarding TaTME. Results: Ninety-four surgeons completed the survey (38% response rate). The number of rectal cancer cases handled annually by surgeons varied widely (1­80 cases, median 15 cases). Twenty-seven percent of respondents performed TaTME at the time of the survey, and 43% of those who did not said they planned on learning the technique. Surgeons who performed TaTME felt that a higher annual volume of rectal cancer cases was required to maintain proficiency than did non-TaTME surgeons (median 20 cases [interquartile range (IQR) 15­25 cases] v. 15 cases [IQR 10­20 cases]). Surgeons who performed TaTME also felt that a higher annual volume of TaTME cases was required to maintain proficiency (median 12 cases [IQR 10­19 cases] v. 9 cases [IQR 5­10 cases]). Conclusion: These findings help define the current practice environment for rectal cancer surgeons in Canada and highlight the complex issues associated with learning TaTME.

Contexte: Selon des données préliminaires, l'exérèse totale du mésorectum par voie transanale (ou TaTME, pour transanal total mesorectal excision) est une solution de rechange sécuritaire à l'approche abdominale pour le cancer du rectum. Cette étude vise à faire le point sur le traitement du cancer rectal au Canada et à mesurer l'intérêt à l'endroit de la technique TaTME. Méthodes: Des chirurgiens ont été invités à répondre à un sondage sur leur façon de prendre en charge le cancer rectal et sur leur opinion au sujet de la TaTME. Résultats: Quatre-vingt-quatorze chirurgiens ont répondu au sondage (taux deréponse 38 %). Le nombre de cancer rectaux traités annuellement par chirurgien variait grandement (de 1 à 80 cas, nombre médian 15 cas). Vingt-sept pour cent des participants appliquaient la TaTME au moment du sondage et 43 % de ceux qui ne l'appliquaient pas disait avoir l'intention de s'y initier. Les chirurgiens qui appliquaient la TaTME se disaient d'avis qu'il fallait un volume annuel plus élevé de cas de cancer rectal pour garder la main comparativement aux chirurgiens qui n'appliquaient pas cette technique (nombre médian de 20 cas [éventail interquartile (ÉIQ) 15­25 cas] c. 15 cas [ÉIQ 10­20 cas]). Les chirurgiens qui appliquaient la TaTME ont aussi estimé qu'il fallait un volume annuel plus élevé de cas de TaTME pour garder la main (nombre médian de 12 cas [ÉIQ 10­19 cas] c. 9 cases (ÉIQ 5­10 cas]). Conclusion: Ces observations permettent de mieux définir les pratiques actuelles des chirurgiens qui soignent le cancer rectal au Canada et mettent en lumière les enjeux complexes inhérents à l'apprentissage de la TaTME.

A novel approach to assessing technical competence of colorectal surgery residents: the development and evaluation of the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (COSATS).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate an objective method of technical skills assessment for graduating subspecialists in colorectal (CR) surgery-the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (COSATS). BACKGROUND: It may be reasonable for the public to assume that surgeons certified as competent have had their technical skills assessed. However, technical skill, despite being the hallmark of a surgeon, is not directly assessed at the time of certification by surgical boards. METHODS: A procedure-based, multistation technical skills examination was developed to reflect a sample of the range of skills necessary for CR surgical practice. These consisted of bench, virtual reality, and cadaveric models. Reliability and construct validity were evaluated by comparing 10 graduating CR residents with 10 graduating general surgery (GS) residents from across North America. Expert CR surgeons, blinded to level of training, evaluated performance using a task-specific checklist and a global rating scale. The mean global rating score was used as the overall examination score and a passing score was set at "borderline competent for CR practice." RESULTS: The global rating scale demonstrated acceptable interstation reliability (0.69) for a homogeneous group of examinees. Both the overall checklist and global rating scores effectively discriminated between CR and GS residents (P < 0.01), with 27% of the variance attributed to level of training. Nine CR residents but only 3 GS residents were deemed competent. CONCLUSIONS: The Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill effectively discriminated between CR and GS residents. With further validation, the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill could be incorporated into the colorectal board examination where it would be the first attempt of a surgical specialty to formally assess technical skill at the time of certification.

Simulation in surgical education.

The pedagogical approach to surgical training has changed significantly over the past few decades. No longer are surgical skills solely acquired through a traditional apprenticeship model of training. The acquisition of many technical and nontechnical skills is moving from the operating room to the surgical skills laboratory through the use of simulation. Many platforms exist for the learning and assessment of surgical skills. In this article, the authors provide a broad overview of some of the currently available surgical simulation modalities including bench-top models, laparoscopic simulators, simulation for new surgical technologies, and simulation for nontechnical surgical skills.

Proximal diversion at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: current practices of North American colorectal surgeons.

PURPOSE: Pelvic sepsis is a serious complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis that may lead to pouch failure or poor function. Although a temporary loop ileostomy may be created at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to prevent or minimize the consequences of an anastomotic leak, research has suggested that an ileostomy can be safely omitted in selected patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of proximal diversion by colorectal surgeons at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all practicing fellows of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons in North America. Surgeons were asked to describe their typical practice for a number of clinical scenarios. RESULTS: Questionnaires were mailed to 913 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons fellows, and 63 percent responded. For a patient who has had a prior colectomy and is not taking steroids, 27 percent of surgeons would perform ileal pouch-anal anastomosis alone, and 73 percent would perform ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a loop ileostomy. For a patient who has not had previous surgery and is taking prednisone 40 mg/day, 16 percent of surgeons would perform a subtotal colectomy with an end ileostomy, 82 percent would perform a total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a loop ileostomy, and 2 percent would perform a total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without an ileostomy. There was no relationship between practice setting, annual ileal pouch-anal anastomosis volume, or years in practice and surgeon response for either scenario. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surgeons create a temporary loop ileostomy at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.