High-intensity Interval Training in the Boundaries of the Severe Domain: Effects on Sprint and Endurance Performance.

In order to compare the effects of two 4-week interval training programs performed at the lower (Critical Power, CP) or at the higher (The highest intensity at which V˙O2max is attained, IHIGH) intensities of the severe exercise domain on sprint and endurance cycling performance, 21 recreationally trained cyclists performed the Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) and a 250-kJ time trial. Accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD), surface electromyography (RMS), and blood lactate kinetics were measured during the WAnT. Subjects were assigned to 105% CP or IHIGH groups. During the WAnT, significantly greater improvements in peak (Mean ±95%CI) (5.7±2.3% vs. 0.2±2.2%), mean power output (MPO) (3.7±2.0% vs. 0.5±1.8%), and RMS (17.8±7.4% vs. -15.7±7.9%) were observed in the IHIGH group (P<0.05). Higher and lower AOD, respectively, at the start and during the second half of the WAnT were observed after IHIGH training. The changes in RMS and MPO induced by the training were significantly correlated (r=0.584). The 2 interventions induced improvements in the 250-kJ time trial. In conclusion, although the improvements in endurance performance were similar, training at IHIGH led to higher gains in WAnT performance than training at 105%CP.

VO2 responses to running speeds above intermittent critical speed.

The aim of this study was to examine whether intermittent critical speed (ICS) is the threshold velocity above which intermittent exercise leads to the attainment of VO(2max). After an incremental test, 7 active male subjects (49.7 ± 3.74 mL.min (- 1).kg (- 1)) performed 3 intermittent exercises until exhaustion at 100%, 110%, 120% of the velocity associated with VO(2max) to determine ICS. On 4 occasions, the subjects performed intermittent exercise tests until exhaustion at the velocity corresponding to 105% (IE(105)) and 110% (IE(110)) of ICS, and at a speed that was initially set at 125%ICS but which then decreased to 105%ICS (IE(125-105)) in one instance and to 110%ICS (IE(125-110)) in another. The intermittent exercises consisted of repeated 30-s runs alternated with 15-s passive rest intervals. At IE(125)-105, peak VO(2) was not different from VO(2max) but decreased significantly after the change of speed to 105%ICS. During IE(110), peak VO(2) value reached VO(2max) and also during the higher speed at IE(125-110), but did not change when the speed was lowered. These results demonstrated that during intermittent exercise just above ICS (105%) VO(2max) was not elicited, suggesting that ICS might not be the threshold speed above which VO(2max) can be reached.