Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 37(3): 100763, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37393656

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of different treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macroscopic vascular invasion. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies was performed to evaluate various treatment modalities for HCC with macroscopic vascular invasion, including liver resection (LR), liver transplantation (LT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), radiotherapy (RT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and antineoplastic systemic therapy (AnST). RESULTS: After applying the selection criteria, 31 studies were included. The surgical resection (SR) group (including LR and LT) had a similar mortality rate to the non-surgical resection (NS) group (RD = -0.01; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.03). The SR group had a higher rate of complications (RD = 0.06; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.12) but a higher 3-year overall survival (OS) rate than the NS group (RD = 0.12; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.20). The network analysis revealed that the overall survival was lower in the AnST group. LT and LR had similar survival benefits. The meta-regression suggested that SR has a greater impact on the survival of patients with impaired liver function. DISCUSSION: Most likely, LT has a significant impact on long-term survival and consequently would be a better option for HCC with macroscopic vascular invasion in patients with impaired liver function. LT and LR offer a higher chance of long-term survival than NS alternatives, although LR and LR are associated with a higher risk of procedure-related complications.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Metanálise em Rede , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rev Bras Ortop ; 50(6): 660-5, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27218077

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the gain in elbow flexion in patients with traumatic injury of the brachial plexus following muscle transfer from latissimus dorsi with the gain following free muscle transfer from the medial belly of the gastrocnemius. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in which the medical files of a convenience sample of 13 patients operated between 2000 and 2010 were reviewed. Group 1 comprised seven patients who underwent transfers from the gastrocnemius and group 2 (controls) comprised six patients who underwent transfers from the latissimus dorsi. The following functions were evaluated: (1) range of motion (ROM) of elbow flexion, in degrees, using manual goniometry and (2) grade of elbow flexion strength, using a muscle strength scale. Satisfactory results were defined as: (1) elbow flexion ROM ≥ 80° and (2) elbow flexion strength ≥ M3. The Fisher exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 32 years (range: 17-56) and 72% had been involved in motorcycle accidents. Elbow flexion strength ≥ M3 was observed in seven patients (100%) in group 1 and in five patients (83.3%) in group 2 (p = 0.462). None of the patients presented M5, and one patient (16.7%) in group 2 had a poor result (M2). Elbow flexion ROM with a gain ≥ 80° (daily functions) was found in six patients (86%) in group 1 and in three patients (50%) in group 2 (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: The patients in group 1 had greater gains in strength and ROM than did those in group 2, but without statistical significance. Thus, transfers from the gastrocnemius become a new surgical option, if other techniques cannot be used.


OBJETIVO: Comparar o ganho de flexão do cotovelo em pacientes com lesão traumática do plexo braquial após transferência muscular do latíssimo dorsal (TMLD) com a transferência muscular livre do ventre medial do gastrocnêmio (TMLGM). METÓDOS: Estudo retrospectivo, revisão de prontuários, amostra de conveniência, com 13 pacientes operados, entre 2000 e 2010. Grupo 1 (TMLGM) com sete pacientes e grupo 2 ou controle (TMLD) com seis. Função avaliada: 1) amplitude de movimento (ADM) em graus da flexão do cotovelo, goniometria manual; 2) grau de força de flexão do cotovelo, por escala de força muscular. Satisfatórios: 1) ADM: flexão do cotovelo ≥ 80°; 2) Força: flexão do cotovelo ≥ M3. Testes exato de Fisher e Kruskal­Wallis (p < 0,05). RESULTADOS: Média de idade foi de 32 anos (17 a 56). Acidente de moto em 72%. Força de flexão do cotovelo ≥ M3 no grupo 1 em sete pacientes (100%) e o grupo 2 em cinco (83,3%) (p = 0,462). Não tivemos M5 e o grupo 2 apresentou um paciente (16,7%) com resultado ruim M2. ADM na flexão do cotovelo com ganho ≥ 80° (funções diárias) foram encontrados no grupo 1 em seis pacientes (86%) e no grupo 2 em três (50%) (p = 0,1). CONCLUSÃO: Pacientes do grupo 1 tiveram um ganho maior de força e ADM, quando comparados com os do grupo 2, sem significado estatístico. Assim, TMLGM se torna uma nova opção cirúrgica, caso não possam ser aplicadas outras técnicas.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...