Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test: Comparison of traditional and qualitative scoring systems after unilateral temporal lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the performance on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF) of patients that had undergone unilateral anterior temporal lobectomy under both Taylor's and Loring's scoring systems to identify the sensitivity and specificity of each item for differentiating visuospatial memory deficits. METHOD: We administered the ROCF to evaluate the visual memory of 37 left anterior temporal lobectomy (LATL) and 38 right anterior temporal lobectomy (RATL) patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy who had undergone a standard unilateral anterior temporal lobectomy between 1996 and 2010. Fisher's exact and Qui-Quadrado tests were used to analyze the relationships between the qualitative variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the quantitative variables from the right and left sides. RESULTS: RATL patients performed worse than LATL patients based on the total score for delayed recall (DR) (p = 0.012). The scoring system's showed a specificity of 97.2% & 78.9% and sensitivity of 10.5% & 62.2% on DR, for the Taylor and Loring systems respectively. Our detailed analysis of certain items showed that some differed between the groups in terms of the presence/absence, correct reproduction, and errors of those items. Loring' errors I, IV, and X on DR and errors IV and X on immediate recall were more frequent in the RATL group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of these two scoring systems combined may help maximize sensitivity and specificity with clinical populations. Further, our analyses showed that items could be clustered better and different weights could be given to them to maximize sensitivity and specificity.

Nonverbal fluency assessed by the five-point test in epilepsy patients with unilateral mesial temporal sclerosis-a Brazilian study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of epilepsy patients diagnosed with unilateral mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) on a nonverbal fluency measure using the five-point test (FPT). Our secondary aim was to investigate any differences in FPT and verbal fluency test (VFT) scores between left and right MTS. We hypothesized that scores on the FPT, commonly utilized in the assessment of individuals with presumed frontal lobe damage, would be lower in patients with temporal lobe dysfunction. METHOD: One hundred eighty patients diagnosed with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and 150 healthy controls (HCs) were included in this retrospective study. We analyzed correlations between scores obtained from FPT and phonemic and semantic VFT, and scores according to the lateralization of epileptogenic focus in the TLE group. RESULTS: Overall, the TLE patients had lower performance than the HCs on the FPT, but no differences were observed on perseverance rates (p = 0.992). Statistically significant difference was found in both sections of the VFT in association with the lateralization of the epileptogenic zone (p < 0.001). As for the FPT, differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0857). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis of involvement of the temporal areas on tasks such as the FPT, despite the lack of a lateralizing effect. Our findings also contribute to better understanding of the role of the FPT in assessment of executive function in patients with unilateral MTS, and provide further psychometric data on a native Brazilian population.