Safety and efficacy of nivolumab, an anti-PD1 immunotherapy, in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma, after failure or intolerance to sonic Hedgehog inhibitors: UNICANCER AcSé NIVOLUMAB trial.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignancy. In most cases, BCC has slow progression and can be definitively cured by surgery or radiotherapy. However, in rare cases, it can become locally advanced or, even more rarely, metastatic. The alternative recommended treatments are Sonic Hedgehog pathway inhibitors; however, the response is often short-lived. METHODS: This was a phase 2 basket study (NCT03012581) evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in a cohort of 32 advanced BCC patients, enrolled after failure of Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, including 29 laBCC (91%) and 3 mBCC (9%). RESULTS: Compared to previously published studies, our population consisted of severe patients with a poor prognosis because they had already received multiple lines of treatment: all patients received previous Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, 53% of patients already had chemotherapy and 75% radiotherapy. At 12 weeks, we reported 3.1% of complete responses, 18.8% of partial responses, and 43.8% of stable diseases. The best response rate to nivolumab reached 12.5% of complete responses (four patients), 18.8% of partial responses (three patients), and 43.8% of stable diseases (14 patients). Adverse events (AE) were mostly grade 2 or 3, slightly different to the adverse events observed in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (higher rate of diabetes, no thyroid dysfunction). CONCLUSION: Nivolumab is a relevant therapeutic option for patients with advanced relapsing/refractory BCC.

18F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital.

AIM: To perform a comprehensive analysis of discordances between contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of the extra-cerebral treatment monitoring in patients with stage IV melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study over a 3-year period in patients referred for 18F-FDG PET/CT and ceCT in the framework of therapy monitoring of immune checkpoint (ICIs) as of January 2017. Imaging reports were analyzed by two physicians in consensus. The anatomical site responsible for discordances, as well as induced changes in treatment were noted. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included and 195 pairs of scans analyzed. Overall, discordances occurred in 65 cases (33%). Eighty percent of the discordances (52/65) were due to 18F-FDG PET/CT scans upstaging the patient. Amongst these discordances, 17/52 (33%) led to change in patient's management, the most frequent being radiotherapy of a progressing site. ceCT represented 13/65 (20%) of discordances and induced changes in patients' management in 2/13 cases (15%). The most frequent anatomical site involved was subcutaneous for 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and lung or liver for ceCT. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment monitoring with 18F-FDG PET/CT is more efficient than ceCT and has a greater impact in patient's management.

Revisiting detection of in-transit metastases in melanoma patients using digital 18F-FDG PET/CT with small-voxel reconstruction.

AIM: To evaluate the use of digital 18F-FDG PET/CT with small-voxels reconstruction for detecting in-transit metastases in melanoma patients with primary lesion located on the upper or lower limbs, in comparison with standard reconstruction and European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research limited (EARL)-compliant reconstruction mimicking former generation PET systems. METHODS: Forty-six PET examinations acquired in list mode on a Vereos digital PET/CT system were reconstructed with (1) the standard reconstruction [2 iterations, 10 subsets (2i10s), point-spread function (PSF) modelling and time-of-flight enabled, no post-filtering and voxel size of 2 mm], (2) a small-voxel reconstruction using 1 mm voxels otherwise using the same parameters, (3) an EARL-compliant reconstruction mimicking a former generation system. Comparison of results across these reconstructions was made for a blind randomized review using a 3-point scale for the presence of in-transit metastases and image quality as well as for tumour-to-background (T/B) ratios and noise level in reference organs. RESULTS: Seven of the thirty-two EARL-compliant images classified as negative moved to positive on 1mmPSF images, and 5 of the 6 EARL-compliant images classified as indeterminate moved to positive on 1mmPSF images (P = 0.01). Amongst a total of 20 PET examinations classified as positive using the 1mmPSF reconstruction, fifteen were considered true positive, five false positive results occurred. Twenty-four patients with 1 mm PSF images were classified as negative, none of those under active surveillance experienced in-transit metastases during the 17 months following their PET examination. The positive likelihood ratio for the 1 mm reconstruction was much higher than that observed for EARL-compliant images (14.7 vs 7.82). Importantly, negative likelihood ratios for the 1 mm and 1mmPSF reconstruction were almost perfect. Compared to EARL-compliant data, T/B ratios extracted from the 1mmPSF showed a 2.84-fold increase (P < 0.001). A similar pattern of statistically significant increase was observed for noise level in organs of reference. Image quality for the torso was found to be significantly lower for 1mmPSF reconstruction (P = 0.03). Image quality for the limbs was found to be better for 1mmPSF (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Digital PET with small-voxel reconstruction brings an additional value for the detection of in-transit metastases by reducing the number of indeterminate findings and making up for falsely negative scans using former generation PET systems. An acquisition encompassing lower or upper limbs as appropriate should be performed.