In vitro interaction between ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743) and radiation, in relation to its cell cycle effects.

Ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743) is a new marine-derived agent with promising activity against a number of solid tumours. In four human tumour cell lines, the interaction between ET-743 and radiation was investigated in relation to the effects of ET-743 on the cell cycle, in vitro. Cell survival was measured based on quantitative staining of cellular protein by sulforhodamine B. A 24 h treatment with ET-743 before radiation resulted in a moderate increase in radiosensitivity in three out of four cell lines. Dose enhancement factors > or =1.8 were observed for concentrations resulting in 52, 46 and 30% cell kill in ECV304, H292 and CAL-27, respectively, whereas in A549 no radiosensitisation was observed (no significant increase in radiosensitivity). According to the combination index analysis, synergism was observed only in ECV304 and CAL-27 cells. A 24 h incubation with ET-743 resulted in a concentration-dependent G2/M block, which might explain the moderate radiosensitising effects in ECV304 and H292. The lack of radiosensitisation in A549 might be due to the S phase delay preceding the G2/M block at the moment of radiation, which only occurred in this cell line. In conclusion, ET-743 has moderate cell line-dependent radiosensitising properties; however, only when cytotoxic concentrations of ET-743 are used. In one of the four cell lines tested, no radiosensitisation was observed.

The radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine and the influence of the rescue agent amifostine in vitro.

In this study, the radiosensitising effect of different concentrations of gemcitabine and the combination of gemcitabine/radiotherapy with the rescue agent amifostine was investigated in different human tumour cell lines. The cells were treated with gemcitabine (0-8 nM) for 24 h prior to radiation (0-8 Gy). Amifostine (ami) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) were added 30 min before radiation. Cell survival was determined 7 or 8 days after radiation treatment by the sulforhodamine B (SRB) test. For ECV304 cells, the dose enhancement factor (DEF) varied from 1.39 to 2.98 after treatment with 1-6 nM gemcitabine. FaDu, H292, A549 and CAL-27 seemed to be less sensitive, with DEFs ranging from 1.02 to 2.67. These cells were also less sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of single-agent gemcitabine. Amifostine with AP clearly showed a protective effect in combination with gemcitabine/radiotherapy. In H292 cells, the protection factor (PF) of amifostine after treatment with gemcitabine and radiotherapy varied from 1.64 to 1.86. In ECV304 cells, the PF varied from 2.20 to 2.29. In conclusion, a clear concentration- and cell line-dependent radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine was observed in all cell lines. Amifostine with AP showed protection against the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine. If the protection in vivo indeed occurs selectively in normal tissues, then amifostine could prevent or strongly minimise the increased toxicity resulting from the radiosensitising effect of the combination of gemcitabine and radiotherapy, without influencing the antitumour effect.