Adenomyosis and obstetric complications: A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Adenomyosis is a uterine pathology affecting an increasing number of women of childbearing age. Its diagnosis is based upon histology or imaging [ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)]. Several studies have investigated the impact of adenomyosis on obstetric complications, with its diagnosis based on clinical symptoms, ultrasound or composite criteria. The aim of this study was to identify potential obstetric complications related to adenomyosis in women with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis. METHODS: A single centre retrospective case-control study was undertaken in pregnant patients with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis of adenomyosis between January 2013 and December 2017 at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg. Controls were matched in a 4:1 ratio for age, parity and body mass index. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify obstetric complications. RESULTS: In total, 291 women with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis of adenomyosis were identified during the study period. Of these, 89 patients achieved pregnancy after 24 weeks of gestation. The mean age of patients was 30.8 years. The adenomyosis group and the control group were comparable for matching criteria. Adenomyosis was found to be associated with increased risk of caesarean section [odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.2; p = 0.03], intrauterine growth restriction (OR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.1-1.4; p < 0.001), postpartum haemorrhage (OR 1.2, 95 % CI 1.1- 1.4; p < 0.01), pre-eclampsia (OR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0-1.6; p = 0.004) and previous spontaneous miscarriage (OR 2.09, 95 % CI 1.36-3.33; p < 0.001). Premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, severe intrauterine growth restriction and the risk of placenta praevia were not significantly higher in the adenomyosis group compared with the control group on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates increased risk of several obstetric complications (caesarean section, intrauterine growth restriction, postpartum haemorrhage, pre-eclampsia, history of spontaneous miscarriage) in women with adenomyosis. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to use MRI as the sole criterion for diagnosis. These results could be complemented by larger-scale prospective studies in order to manage these patients more effectively during pregnancy.

Adherence to European ovarian cancer guidelines and impact on survival: a French multicenter study (FRANCOGYN).

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study was to validate the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) ovarian cancer guideline as a method of assessing quality of care, and to identify patient characteristics predictive of non-adherence to European guideline care. The secondary objectives were to analyze the evolution of practices over the years and to evaluate heterogeneity between centers. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer reported to the FRANCOGYN database included data from 12 French centers between January 2000 and February 2017. The main outcome was adherence to ESMO-ESGO guidelines, defined by recommended surgical procedures according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and appropriate chemotherapy. Mixed multivariable logistic regression analysis with a random center effect was performed to estimate the probability of adherence to the guidelines. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and a mixed Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: 1463 patients were included in the study. Overall, 317 (30%) patients received complete guideline adherent care. Patients received appropriate surgical treatment in 69% of cases, while adequate chemotherapy was administered to 44% of patients. Both patient demographics and disease characteristics were significantly associated with the likelihood of receiving guideline adherent care, such as age, performance status, FIGO stage, and initial burden of disease. In univariate and multivariate survival analysis, adherence to the guidelines was a statistically significant and independent predictor of decreased overall survival. Patients receiving suboptimal care experienced an increased risk of death of more than 100% compared with those treated according to the guidelines (hazard ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 3.47, p<0.01). In both models, a significant random center effect was observed, confirming the heterogeneity between centers (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to ESMO-ESGO guidelines in ovarian cancer was associated with a higher overall survival and may be a useful method of assessing quality of care.