Sensory characteristics and chronic facial pain conditions: Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated patients with neuropathic, myofascial and other orofacial pain conditions according to the differences and similarities of the sensory profile, and the association between sensory findings and neuropathic or non-neuropathic conditions. DESIGN: 132 healthy controls were compared with 174 orofacial pain patients that were classified into three groups (neuropathic, masticatory myofascial and other orofacial pain condition) and evaluated with a systematized protocol of sensory testing. Data were analyzed with chi-quare and Bonferroni correction (categorical data), Student´s t test, oneway ANOVA, Tukey (quantitative features), Pearson´s coefficient for correlations and logistic regression. RESULTS: Cold, olfactory and superficial pain thresholds were higher in the group of neuropathic facial pain compared with the other groups, and the highest vibratory thresholds were observed in the group of other orofacial pain conditions. Deep pain thresholds were statistically lower in the group with masticatory myofascial pain. CONCLUSIONS: Positive sensory findings (eg. hyperalgesia) were more common in the group of patients with masticatory myofascial pain, supporting inflammatory systemic mechanisms, and negative sensory findings not restricted to the trigeminal nerve (eg. hypoesthesia, hyposmia) were more frequent in patients with neuropathic conditions. Non-classical neuropathic orofacial pains also showed sensory impairment from pain chronification and from the overlap with functional disorders.

Somatosensory investigation of patients with orofacial pain compared with controls.

The objective of this study was to investigate the sensorial characteristics of orofacial pain in patients compared with control subjects. A total of 336 subjects (282 patients and 54 control subjects) were evaluated to identify their thermal (cold and warm), tactile, and pain thresholds. Numbness was reported by 61.7% of the patients (p<0.001). Patients with trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia and burning mouth syndrome showed loss of thermal perception; patients with postherpetic neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome, and posttraumatic painful neuropathy had a decrease in tactile perception compared with the control subjects (p<0.001). In conclusion, other sensorial modalities besides pain are affected by neuropathic orofacial pain; these findings can help in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms in orofacial pain.

Orofacial pain and sensory characteristics of chronic patients compared with controls.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate orofacial and sensorial characteristics of patients with orofacial pain and healthy controls. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control. Seventy-five patients (61 women) who had chronic orofacial pain for more than 6 months (i.e., idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome, persistent idiopathic facial pain, nonidiopathic neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia or temporomandibular disorders were compared with 41 healthy subjects (19 women). They were evaluated with a quantitative sensory testing protocol involving a combination of gustative, olfactory, thermal, mechanical and pain stimuli. Mean pain duration in this population was 6.27 ± 6.06 years. Orofacial characteristics (masticatory and articular abnormalities), oral health and sensitivity to muscular palpation were assessed. RESULTS: The majority of patients (73.3%) had pain upon craniofacial muscle palpation and 46.7% had numbness. High cold thresholds were observed with burning mouth syndrome and nonidiopathic neuropathic pain (P = .017), while high tactile thresholds were observed in persistent idiopathic facial pain patients (P = .048). Persistent idiopathic facial pain and temporomandibular disorders were associated with a low threshold for pain perception (P < .002). Several of these sensorial alterations were associated with positive musculoskeletal findings. CONCLUSIONS: Sensorial abnormalities were observed in neuropathic and somatic pain patients. The masticatory system is associated with and may be a secondary cause of pain in such patients.

High prevalence of orofacial complaints in patients with fibromyalgia: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the orofacial complaints and characteristics of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FS) compared with controls. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated 25 patients diagnosed with FS compared with 25 gender- and age-matched controls by using a detailed clinical protocol for orofacial pain diagnosis and dental examination. RESULTS: FS patients had a higher frequency of temporomandibular disorders (TMD), masticatory complaints, pain with mandibular movements, and pain upon palpation of the head and neck area. There were no significant differences related to the dental exam. CONCLUSIONS: Orofacial complaints including TMD may be present either as symptoms of FS or as a comorbidity associated with this condition. A comprehensive evaluation of patients with FS is necessary to identify the need for specific treatments for orofacial complaints. Future studies, especially those with longitudinal design, should clarify whether a cause-effect relationship exists between orofacial complaints and fibromyalgia.

Xerostomia and salivary flow in patients with orofacial pain compared with controls.

OBJECTIVES: Pain in the orofacial region is frequently reported by patients in dental and medical offices. Facial pain, headache, masticatory abnormalities and other complaints often become chronic and may be associated with local disturbances, such as xerostomia and teeth abnormalities. The objective of this study was to investigate salivary flow and xerostomia in patients with orofacial pain. DESIGN: This was a case-control study; we evaluated 82 patients with chronic orofacial pain compared with 56 healthy subjects using a Clinical Pain Questionnaire (pain characteristics, duration, intensity and descriptors), complete dental examination (including static and dynamic evaluation of the jaw) and a Xerostomia Inventory. The salivary flow was quantitatively evaluated. Data was compared through Pearson's chi-square, Fisher's exact, analysis of variance (ANOVA) 1 factor and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Patients often had temporomandibular disorder (TMD) (P=0.001) and pain during facial (P<0.001) and neck palpation (P=0.002). There were no differences in dental examination or other structural aspects of the jaw between the groups. There were more complaints associated with xerostomia in the study group, including burning sensation in the oral mucosa (P=0.003), in the throat (P=0.035) and in the stomach (P=0.050). Patients had lower salivary flow (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Orofacial pain patients need to be evaluated with regard to their salivary function, which was often found abnormal in this sample and may have contributed to the complaints of these patients. Assessing salivary flow and xerostomia may help in the treatment of chronic orofacial pain.

Gingival capillary changes and oral motor weakness in juvenile dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the orofacial involvement in JDM, and evaluated the possible association of gingival and mandibular mobility alterations with demographic data, periodontal indices, clinical features, muscle enzyme levels, JDM scores and treatment. METHODS: Twenty-six JDM patients were studied and compared with 22 healthy controls. Orofacial evaluation included clinical features, dental and periodontal assessment, mandibular function and salivary flow. RESULTS: The mean current age was similar in patients with JDM and controls (P > 0.05). A unique gingival alteration characterized by erythema, capillary dilation and bush-loop formation was observed only in JDM patients (61 vs 0%, P = 0.0001). The frequencies of altered mandibular mobility and reduced mouth opening were significantly higher in patients with JDM vs controls (50 vs 14%, P = 0.013; 31 vs 0%, P = 0.005). Comparison of the patients with and without gingival alteration showed that the former had lower values of median of cementoenamel junction (-0.26 vs -0.06 mm, P = 0.013) and higher gingival bleeding index (27.7 vs 14%, P = 0.046). This pattern of gingival alteration was not associated with periodontal disease [plaque index (P =0.332) and dental attachment loss (P = 0.482)]. The medians for skin DAS and current dose of MTX were higher in JDM with gingival alteration (2.5 vs 0.5, P = 0.029; 28.7 vs 15, P = 0.012). A significant association of lower median manual muscle testing with a reduced ability to open the mouth was observed in patients with JDM than those without this alteration (79 vs 80, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The unique gingival pattern associated with cutaneous disease activity, distinct from periodontal disease, suggests that gingiva is a possible target tissue for JDM. In addition, muscle weakness may be a relevant factor for mandibular mobility.

Severe psychosocial compromise in idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: case report.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes a 60-year-old man with 17 years of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (ITN) which affected tooth brushing for 6 years, causing severe dental complications and psychosocial problems. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: Following ITN diagnosis, this patient underwent neurosurgery (microcompression of the trigeminal ganglion with a balloon) with immediate relief, but after three months, pain recurred and was accompanied by dysesthesia and periodontal disease. After dental treatment, he had complete alleviation of pain and no further need of medication over the following 3 years. The intense suffering of this patient represents the importance of a multidisciplinary evaluation for pain-caused secondary complications. CONCLUSION: ITN is a simple diagnosis but may have complex course. Appropriately trained health professionals are necessary to evaluate and treat these patients.