Incidence of contralateral neurosensitive changes and persistent postoperative pain 6 months after mastectomy: A prospective, observational investigation.

Mirror image sensory dysfunction (MISD) after breast surgery has not yet been studied. This prospective observational study aimed to determine the incidence of MISD, persistent postoperative pain (PPP) and mirror image pain (MIP) during 6 months after total unilateral mastectomy.Visual analogue scale (VAS), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Life orientation test (LOT) and Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) (in ipsi and contralateral breast, axilla and thigh) were recorded. VAS > 3 at 1, 3, and 6 postoperative months was considered PPP. Contralateral changes of QST at any time was considered indicative of MISD and spontaneous contralateral VAS ≥ 1 as MIP.Sixty-four patients were included. PPP at 1, 3 and 6 months was 18.8%, 56.2%, and 21.3%, respectively Ten patients presented MIP. MISD was detected in 79.7% patients in contralateral breast and 62.5% in contralateral axilla. Furthermore, changes in QST were present in 39.1% of patients in thigh. Electronic Von Frey (EVF) changes in both contralateral breast and axilla, and in thigh significantly diminished at all postoperative times. Changes of postoperative EVF ≥ 20% in contralateral breast were associated to higher VAS values. NPSI scores were significantly higher at all postoperative times. At 1 month, PCS, depression HADS subscale and LOT scores were significantly worse than all the other periods.MISD incidence was almost 80%, and 15.6% of patients showed spontaneous contralateral VAS ≥ 1. At 6 months 21.3% of patients manifested PPP. The worst alteration of factors related to PPP occurred at 1 postoperative month. Most consistent QST was EVF.

Reliability of thromboelastometry for detecting the safe coagulation threshold in patients taking acenocoumarol after elective heart valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Reversal of anticoagulation can be needed in patients undergoing heart valve surgery. ROTEM® has been correlated with international normalized ratio (INR) in patients on warfarin but not with patients on acenocoumarol. This study investigates the reliability of ROTEM® for detecting INR values below the 1.5 threshold in patients on acenocoumarol therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients on oral anticoagulation with acenocoumarol after elective heart valve replacement were prospectively included in the study. INR and the ROTEM® were measured simultaneously. ROTEM® parameters included coagulation time, clot formation time, alpha angle, and maximal clot firmness after tissue factor activation (EXTEM). Concordance between INR and ROTEM® was analyzed by Lin's concordance coefficient (LCC) and the correlation with Spearman's rho. RESULTS: Fifty-four consecutive patients (40 female; median age 67years) were included. Clotting time (CT) was the parameter that best correlated with INR (r=0.81, p<0,001), and LCC was substantial (0.67). CT was able to predict INR values above or below 1.5: area under curve=0.998. CT≥84seconds, corresponding to a cut-off for likelihood ratio (LR+)=5, had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 80%, respectively, to detect an INR below 1.5. For the same INR threshold, CT≥84seconds had a predictive positive value of 92.9% and a predictive negative value of 100%. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that CT≥84seconds in the EXTEM ROTEM® test is a feasible method for predicting an insufficient reversion of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients taking acenocoumarol after elective heart valve surgery.