Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 26(3): 545-52, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23034274

RESUMO

The aim of this ex vivo study was to evaluate bacterial penetration after filling root canals using 3 different techniques. Three experimental groups of 25 teeth each, obturated with lateral-warm-vertical condensation of gutta-percha, Microseal technique and EndoREZ system, respectively, were tested in a split chamber model system using Enterococcus faecalis and monitored for 180 days to determine bacterial penetration. A statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median survival time was 25 days for Microseal system, 41 for lateral-warm-vertical condensation and 81 for EndoREZ®. Significant differences were demonstrated between Microseal and EndoREZ (p less than 0.001) and between Microseal and lateral-warm-vertical condensation technique (p less than 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between EndoREZ and lateral-warm-vertical condensation. After 180 days of assessment, 20 percent of the EndoREZ samples resisted bacterial penetration and furthermore, the EndoREZ system has the potential to be a filler system compatible with other currently used systems.


Assuntos
Resinas Compostas/farmacologia , Cavidade Pulpar/microbiologia , Enterococcus faecalis/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/farmacologia , Dente/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
J Endod ; 24(7): 461-4, 1998 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9693570

RESUMO

K-type files, Sureflex NiTi files, and FlexoFiles were evaluated morphometrically as they come from the manufacturer, and after being used to instrument root canals 1, 3, and 5 times in maxillary premolars. Evaluation was made using a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification and photomicrographs. The abnormalities found after instrumentation were submitted for statistical analysis. It was concluded that small-sized stainless-steel instruments should be discarded after one use. On the other hand, #30 stainless-steel K-files could be used up to three times and #30 stainless-steel FlexoFiles up to five times. Sureflex NiTi instruments, even after five times, did not show appreciable abnormalities in shape. It is strongly recommended that small-sized nickel-titanium instruments should be discarded after five uses.


Assuntos
Instrumentos Odontológicos , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Ligas , Análise de Variância , Falha de Equipamento , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Humanos , Aço Inoxidável
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...