Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in patients undergoing liver transplantation: a Spanish matched cohort multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (I-CC) on pathological examination after liver transplantation for HCC. BACKGROUND: Information on the outcome of cirrhotic patients undergoing a transplant for HCC and with a diagnosis of HCC-CC or I-CC by pathological study is limited. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort 1:2 study. STUDY GROUP: 42 patients undergoing a transplant for HCC and with a diagnosis of HCC-CC or I-CC by pathological study; and control group: 84 patients with a diagnosis of HCC. I-CC subgroup: 27 patients compared with 54 controls; HCC-CC subgroup: 15 patients compared with 30 controls. Patients were also divided according to the preoperative tumor size and number: uninodular tumors 2 cm or smaller and multinodular or uninodular tumors 2 cm or larger. Median follow-up: 51 (range, 3-142) months. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rate differed between the study and control groups (83%, 70%, and 60% vs 99%, 94%, and 89%, respectively; P < 0.001). Differences were found in 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates between the I-CC subgroup and their controls (78%, 66%, and 51% vs 100%, 98%, and 93%; P < 0.001), but no differences were observed between the HCC-CC subgroup and their controls (93%, 78%, and 78% vs 97%, 86%, and 86%; P = 0.9). Patients with uninodular tumors 2 cm or smaller in the study and control groups had similar 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate (92%, 83%, 62% vs 100%, 80%, 80%; P = 0.4). In contrast, patients in the study group with multinodular or uninodular tumors larger than 2 cm had worse 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates than their controls (80%, 66%, and 61% vs 99%, 96%, and 90%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCC-CC have similar survival to patients undergoing a transplant for HCC. Preoperative diagnosis of HCC-CC should not prompt the exclusion of these patients from transplant option.

Prophylactic therapy with valgancyclovir in high-risk (cytomegalovirus D+/R-) liver transplant recipients: a single-center experience.

A retrospective study was performed in liver transplant patients with high risk to develop cytomegalovirus infection (CMV D+/R-) who were treated with valgancyclovir for 3 months as prophylactic therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of prophylactic therapy with valgancyclovir. Weekly CMV antigenemia was routinely assessed during the first 3 months posttransplantation, twice a month to month 6, and monthly until the end of the first year, as well as when clinically indicated. The follow-up period was 1 year. From January 2003 to February 2007, 199 liver transplantations were performed at our institution, including 23 (11%) high-risk patients for CMV infection. Median age was 47 +/- 11.6 years. Nineteen patients (70.4%) were men. Five subjects (21.7%) developed CMV infections. Three patients with positive CMV antigenemia at 3, 4, or 6 months posttransplantation were asymptomatic, while 2 (8.7%) showed gastrointestinal CMV disease at 2 months posttransplantation or CMV hepatitis at 1 month after the end of the prophylactic therapy. Treatment with intravenous gancyclovir followed by oral valgancyclovir was successful in both patients. No opportunistic infections were observed and only 1 patient developed leukopenia as an adverse event related to valgancyclovir.

Donors older than 70 years in liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Expansion of donor criteria has become necessary with the increasing number of liver transplantation candidates, as aged donors who have been considered to yield marginal organs. METHODS: Our database of 477 liver transplants (OLT) included 55 cases performed from donors at least 70 years old vs 422 with younger donors. We analyzed pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics as well as evolution of the recipients. RESULTS: The old donor group showed significantly lower ALT (23 +/- 17 vs 48.9 +/- 67; P = .0001) and LDH (444 +/- 285 vs 570 +/- 329; P = .01). There was a trend toward fewer hypotensive events in the aged donor group (27.2% vs 40.5%; P = .07). No steatosis (>10%) was accepted in the old donor group. Cold ischemia time was statistically shorter for the aged donors (297 +/- 90 minutes vs 346 +/- 139 minutes; P = .03). With these selected donors, the results were not different for primary nonfunction, arterial and biliary complications, hospitalization, acute reoperation or acute retransplantation, and hospital mortality when donors > or =70 years old were compared to younger donors. Functional cholestasis, neither related to rejection nor to biliary complications, was seen more frequently in old donor recipients (40% vs 22%; P = .03). No differences in 1, and 3 year survivals were observed between recipients of donors over 70 years old and these of younger organs: 93.8% and 90.6% vs 90.7% and 82.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: When using selected donors > or =70 years old the outcomes were comparable to those obtained with younger donors. Strict selection is necessary to achieve good long-term survival.