Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) pose challenges in clinical practice. PCCRCs occur due to a combination of procedural and biological causes. In a nested case-control study, we compared clinical and molecular features of PCCRCs and detected CRCs (DCRCs). METHODS: Whole-genome chromosomal copy number changes and mutation status of genes commonly affected in CRC were examined by low-coverage WGS and targeted sequencing, respectively. MSI and CIMP status was also determined. RESULTS: In total, 122 PCCRCs and 98 DCRCs with high-quality DNA were examined. PCCRCs were more often located proximally (P < 0.001), non-polypoid appearing (P = 0.004), early stage (P = 0.009) and poorly differentiated (P = 0.006). PCCRCs showed significantly less 18q loss (FDR < 0.2), compared to DCRCs. No significant differences in mutations were observed. PCCRCs were more commonly CIMP high (P = 0.014) and MSI (P = 0.029). After correction for tumour location, only less 18q loss remained significant (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Molecular features associated with the sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms (CRNs) are more commonly seen in PCCRCs than in DCRCs. These together with the clinical features observed support the hypothesis that SSLs and non-polypoid CRNs are contributors to the development of PCCRCs. The future focus should be directed at improving the detection and endoscopic removal of these non-polypoid CRN and SSLs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR3093 in the Dutch trial register ( www.trialregister.nl ).

The phenotype of the Gly94fsX222 PMP22 insertion.

Point mutations in PMP22 are relatively rare and the phenotype may vary from mild hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) to severe Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 (CMT1). We describe the phenotype of the Gly94fsX222 mutation in the PMP22 gene. Medical records of all patients were reviewed and 11 patients were re-examined. EMG was carried out in nine patients and nerve biopsy in one. Thirteen patients originating from seven families with a Gly94fsX222 mutation were included and consisted of 10 women and 3 men with a median age of 41 years (range 7-67). Five index patients were originally suspected of CMT1. Ten patients had abnormal motor skills during childhood. Nine patients had a history of pressure palsies. Involvement of the olfactory, trigeminal, facial, and pudendal nerves occurred in three patients. Twelve patients had pes cavus and one scoliosis. Distal anterior leg and distal arm weakness were found in 12 and 4 patients, respectively. Twelve patients had distal leg sensory abnormalities. Electrophysiological examination revealed a demyelinating sensorimotor neuropathy, both resembling CMT1 and HNPP. Sural nerve biopsy showed demyelinating neuropathy with presence of tomacula. More than three-fourths of the patients with Gly94fsX222 mutation demonstrated a CMT1 phenotype combined with transient deficits. Clinicians should test for this mutation in those patients exhibiting a generalised neuropathy combined with compressive like episodes.