Pharmacokinetics of Oral and Intravenous Oseltamivir Treatment of Severe Influenza B Virus Infection Requiring Organ Replacement Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with severe influenza virus infection, multi-organ failure and organ replacement therapy may absorb and metabolize neuraminidase inhibitors differently. Systematic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic clinical trials are currently lacking in this high-risk group. Inadequate dosing increases the risk of treatment failure and drug resistance, especially in severely ill patients with elevated virus loads. This study aims to explore the impact of organ replacement therapy on oseltamivir drug concentrations. METHODS: Serial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic measurements and Sieving coefficients were assessed in two patients with severe influenza B infection requiring organ replacement therapy. RESULTS: Patient #1, a 9-year-old female with severe influenza B virus infection, biventricular assist device, and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration, received 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice-daily for 2 days, then intravenous oseltamivir with one-time renoprotective dosing (40 mg), followed by regular intravenous administration of 100 mg twice-daily. Plasma oseltamivir carboxylate concentrations were stable initially, but only regular administration of 100 mg resulted in virus load decline and clinical improvement. Patient #2, a 28-year-old female with influenza B virus infection requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, received 75 mg oral oseltamivir twice-daily, resulting in erratic oseltamivir blood concentrations. In both patients, drug concentrations remained well within safety margins. CONCLUSIONS: In severe cases with multi-organ failure, administration of 100 mg intravenous oseltamivir twice-daily provided reliable drug concentrations, as opposed to renoprotective and oral dosing, thereby minimizing the risk of treatment failure and drug resistance. Evidence-based pediatric dosing recommendations and effective intravenous antiviral treatment modalities are needed for intensive care patients with life-threatening influenza disease.

Co-medication and interference testing in bioanalysis: a European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation.

Interference testing of co-medication in bioanalytical method validation has become an area of debate in view of the increased specificity offered by current state-of-the-art technology in both LC-MS/MS and ligand-binding assay platforms. In view of this, and considering the extensive experience within the European Bioanalysis Forum member companies, we evaluated the impact of co-medication on the performance of hundreds of bioanalytical methods with the aim of providing a science-based recommendation on how to evaluate and document potential interference from co-medication on the PK parameters in clinical studies in patients and volunteers.

Blood stability testing: European Bioanalysis Forum view on current challenges for regulated bioanalysis.

Since 2008, blood stability testing has gained considerable attention in the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) with discussions aiming to align processes, timing and reporting of analyte stability testing in blood as part of method development and validation. In this recommendation, EBF summarizes the conclusions reached to date and aims to provide recommendation for the experimental conduct of such assays as well as the inclusion of stability testing into the scope of method development and validation. Besides considering a step-wise approach for blood stability testing, recommendation is made to analyze the blood fraction using a qualified assay in order to circumvent important experimental hurdles. This article will provide an increased understanding of the impact of blood stability testing but furthermore invites scientists to share their views in order to refine the thinking to reach a global harmonized view.

Determination of sugammadex in human plasma, urine, and dialysate using a high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay.

Sugammadex (Bridion®, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Oss, The Netherlands) is a modified γ-cyclodextrin which has the ability to reverse the neuromuscular blockade induced by the steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents rocuronium and vecuronium. The objective of the current study is to describe the bioanalytical methods that have been developed and validated according to US Food and Drug Administration guidelines on bioanalytical method validation, and subsequently applied to determine total sugammadex (i.e., free sugammadex plus sugammadex bound to the neuromuscular blocking agent) in human heparinized plasma, urine and dialysate. Sugammadex was extracted from human plasma and urine using solid phase extraction with Isolute HAX 96-well extraction plates; no extraction was performed on dialysate samples. Samples from plasma, urine, and dialysate were analyzed on a Polaris® C18-A PEEK (polyaryletheretherketone) analytical column (50 mm × 4.6 mm internal diameter, 5 µm) with a linear mobile phase gradient of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water:methanol from 70:30 to 20:80. The flow rate was 1 mL/min with a total run time for each injection of 6 min. Tandem mass spectrometric detection was conducted using multiple reaction monitoring under negative ion mode with a turbo ion-spray interface to quantify the concentration of sugammadex. Inter- and intra-assay precision and accuracy were within pre-defined acceptance limits. The presence of rocuronium did not interfere with the assay in plasma, urine or dialysate; similarly, vecuronium did not interfere with the plasma assay (not tested for interference in urine or dialysate). Sugammadex was found to be stable in plasma, urine and dialysate in the short-term at room temperature, in the long-term at -20°C, and after several freeze/thaw cycles. The validated bioanalytical methods developed here have been successfully applied in a series of clinical studies for the determination of total sugammadex in plasma, urine and dialysate.

Sugammadex is cleared rapidly and primarily unchanged via renal excretion.

Sugammadex is a modified γ-cyclodextrin which rapidly reverses rocuronium-and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Previous studies suggest that sugammadex is mostly excreted unchanged via the kidneys. This single-center, open-label, non-randomized study used (14)C-labeled sugammadex to further investigate the excretion, metabolic and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of sugammadex in six healthy male volunteers. (14)C-labeled sugammadex 4 mg/kg (0.025 MBq/kg of (14)C-radioactivity) was administered as a single intravenous bolus. Blood, urine, feces and exhaled air samples were collected at pre-defined intervals for assessment of sugammadex by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and for radioactivity measurements. Adverse events were also assessed. Excretion of sugammadex was rapid with ∼70% of the dose excreted within 6 h and ∼90% within 24 h. Less than 0.02% of radioactivity was excreted in feces or exhaled air. Ninety-five percent of the radioactivity detected in urine could be attributed to sugammadex, as determined by LC-MS, suggesting very limited metabolism of sugammadex. LC-MS analysis of plasma samples found that sugammadex accounted for 100% of total (14)C-radioactivity in the plasma. In general, PK parameters determined from radioactivity and sugammadex plasma concentrations were very similar. Any adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity, and judged unrelated to sugammadex. These findings demonstrate that sugammadex is cleared rapidly, almost exclusively via the kidney, with minimal or no metabolism.

Incurred sample reproducibility: views and recommendations by the European Bioanalysis Forum.

Following intensive discussions, review, alignment of procedures and multiple surveys among their member companies, the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) is providing a recommendation on how to integrate incurred sample reproducibility (ISR) in the bioanalytical process. The recommendation aims to provide guidance throughout the lifecycle of a validated method, including the application of the method in study support. In its recommendation, the EBF considers both the internal discussions with EBF member companies, as well as the input provided in international meetings where ISR was discussed. The ultimate goal of the EBF recommendation is to ensure that bioanalytical methods can provide accurate and reproducible concentration data for pharmacokinetic and/or toxicokinetic evaluation, without any compromise, while safeguarding the optimal use of laboratory resources.