Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 154(9): 338-343, 2020 05 08.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31780215

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Faced with the suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), the guidelines recommend the use of clinical probability scales, measurement of D-dimer and, in certain cases, confirmation by pulmonary angiography by computed tomography (CTPA) or scintigraphy. Recently, it has been proposed to adjust the D-dimer according to age or use simpler scales (YEARS algorithm) for a better selection of patients. OBJECTIVE: To define the degree of application of the guidelines in our population and compare sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the different diagnostic models: Standard model (Wells 2 categories+D-dimer), Model adjusted for age (Wells 2 categories+D-dimer adjusted for age), YEARS algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent APTC at our centre for the diagnosis of PE over one year. RESULTS: Of 618 cases (85.4% of initial APTC), 544 patients were included. A total of 113 EPs were diagnosed (20.8%). The degree of application of the standard model was very high (90.1%) and proved to have the best sensitivity and negative predictive value ratio (sensitivity=1.0, negative predictive value=1.0). The new models could reduce the number of scans (17, 3.2% model adjusted for age and 48, 8.8% model YEARS) with a risk of false negatives (2 PE [1.8%] undiagnosed respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current diagnostic models for PE lead to a large number of unnecessary explorations. The new models could reduce the number of APTC although with a minimum risk of false negatives.


Assuntos
Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio , Embolia Pulmonar , Angiografia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Probabilidade , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Clin Investig Arterioscler ; 31(6): 282-288, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31005341

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: After an ischemic cerebrovascular event the risk of new ischemic events is high, therefore antithrombotic therapy are indicated to prevent stroke recurrence. DISCUSSION: Despite its clear benefit, these therapies increase the risk of bleeding. Therefore, it is essential to identify high hemorrhagic risk patients. There are different predictive models of hemorrhage, in particular of intracranial hemorrhage, associated with the use of antiaggregants in patients who have presented an ischemic stroke or TIA, such as the CCSC, intracranial scales -B2LEED3S score or S2TOP-BLEED. However, though main international guidelines recommend the use of scales, in particular, the HAS-BLED score, to assess the risk of bleeding in anticoagulated patients, there is no specific recommendation in the case of the use of antiplatelet drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In this review we present the main models currently available for the prediction of bleeding of antithrombotic therapy in patients who have had a stroke or TIA.


Assuntos
Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/prevenção & controle , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Fatores Etários , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Hemorragia Cerebral/induzido quimicamente , Etnicidade , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Medição de Risco/métodos , Prevenção Secundária , Fatores Sexuais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...