Randomized comparison of long-term losartan versus propranolol in lowering portal pressure in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It has been suggested that losartan, an angiotensin II (A-II) type 1 receptor blocker, may have a pronounced portal pressure reducing effect, far greater than that of propranolol. This randomized controlled trial compared the hemodynamic and renal effects of continued 6-week administration of losartan (n = 25) vs. propranolol (n = 15) in portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis treated endoscopically after a variceal bleeding episode. METHODS: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), systemic hemodynamics, renal function, and vasoactive factors were measured before and at 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Losartan did not reduce HVPG (-2% +/- 12%, NS) but significantly decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP, -8% +/- 10%, P = 0.001). On the contrary, propranolol significantly reduced HVPG (-10% +/- 11%, P = 0.003) and cardiac output (-16% +/- 12%, P = 0.001) but did not modify MAP (2.5% +/- 10%, NS). Losartan increased A-II levels, reduced aldosterone, and decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Child B patients. Propranolol did not modify renal function. Adverse events related to therapy were mild and similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike propranolol, long-term losartan administration does not significantly reduce HVPG in patients with cirrhosis treated after a variceal bleeding episode, and it caused hypotension and reduced GFR in patients with moderate liver failure. Therefore, losartan is not an alternative to propranolol in preventing variceal rebleeding.

Randomized controlled trial of sclerotherapy versus somatostatin infusion in the prevention of early rebleeding following acute variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Variceal Bleeding Study Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Early rebleeding is a very frequent complication of variceal hemorrhage. Sclerotherapy effectively controls variceal hemorrhage and prevents early rebleeding. Somatostatin infusion is as effective as sclerotherapy in controlling variceal hemorrhage, but no study has evaluated the efficacy of 5-day somatostatin infusion in preventing early rebleeding after the initial control of bleeding. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of somatostatin and sclerotherapy in the prevention of early variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: The study included 169 patients with acute variceal hemorrhage who were randomized within 24 h of controlling the acute bleeding to receive either sclerotherapy (n=79) or continuous somatostatin infusion for 5 days (250 microg/h after a 250-microg bolus, repeated every 24 h, n=90). Success of therapy was defined by absence of rebleeding during the 5 days following randomization. RESULTS: Early (5 days) rebleeding occurred in 12/79 patients treated with sclerotherapy vs 14/90 of those receiving somatostatin (NS). The treatment was equally effective in Child's C patients (sclerotherapy: 18/20; somatostatin: 17/20; NS) and Child's A+B patients (sclerotherapy: 49/59; somatostatin: 59/70; NS). Complications occurred in 19/79 patients receiving sclerotherapy vs 4/90 in the somatostatin group (p= 0.00019), being severe in 6 vs 0 patients (p=0.0094). There were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of 6-week rebleeding (14% vs 15%, NS) and mortality (9% vs 9%). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous somatostatin infusion is as effective as sclerotherapy in preventing early variceal rebleeding and maintaining low mortality following acute variceal hemorrhage. Somatostatin is associated with a lower rate of complications than sclerotherapy.